[CPT-FGC] Re: New Mailing List
- From: Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:48:55 +0200
When it comes to online it's all preference, there is no concrete evidence
that shows which is the most efficient online service between live/pc/psn
on different games not just fighters.
I have been checking online for an absolute answer on the subject and I
have yet to find a straight answer only opinions at this and that's my
opinion about the matter. Which is why offline will always be superior
compared to online play multi-play.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Moshe Shevel <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> And then there are the guys who actively complain about PSN being terrible
> and would rather play on PC and possibly Xbox...
>
> I have no problem with any platform, it is online and there will be lag no
> matter what, but if I'm going to tell them to pick a game, I have to know
> that there will be support for it going forward otherwise it might as well
> not even happen, since it will most likely damage the
> tournament/sponsorship possibilities in the future.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I agree with guys about online not being equivalent to offline, it's not
>> possible to have lagless matches online.
>> This includes all shapes and forms of online offerings(psn/live/pc) all
>> have some type of latency.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Moshe Shevel <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>
>>> True,
>>>
>>> But to get the scene going you need all the type of platforms you can
>>> get, but there has to be support for it otherwise it will become like
>>> Durban's incredible scene, which Joburg is on the way to becoming...
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Agreed
>>>> On 3 Sep 2013 15:24, "Wynand-Ben Viljoen" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't consider online as a viable "platform" for any fighter :P
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:19:46 +0200
>>>>> Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: New Mailing List
>>>>> From: jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was thinking SF4 would be the best as they want to do it for the 3
>>>>> main platforms... Cos everybody loves Wii...
>>>>>
>>>>> However, the real question is would you guys actually participate in a
>>>>> competitive online tournament? I'm probably sure the casual gamers that
>>>>> enter won't really mind the lag as much as most of you guys do.
>>>>>
>>>>> My thought was if it was console only, Injustice and TTT2 would
>>>>> probably be the best choice at the moment since there is probably the
>>>>> least
>>>>> amount of lag and there are a fair amount of players. But a game that uses
>>>>> all the platforms would have to be SF4, except for the fact that PSN might
>>>>> not be considered a viable platform by some of you...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Ashraf Barendse <
>>>>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sf4. It has the largest user base. You can play online. Its on console
>>>>> and pc.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
