Re: Morning

  • From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:34:06 +0200

You will not see massive change with these monitors on a console, or am I
wrong?
On 15 Jun 2016 13:03, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The comments on that article makes me want to chew on my wrists


------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 15 June 2016 10:57 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Morning

LB says good read.
So this must be a load of bullshit right ?

On Wednesday, 15 June 2016, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

good read




http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/do-you-need-a-120hz-or-240-hz-monitor/


<http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/do-you-need-a-120hz-or-240-hz-monitor/>
Do you really need a 120Hz or faster monitor?
<http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/do-you-need-a-120hz-or-240-hz-monitor/>
www.digitaltrends.com
If you’re looking for a new monitor, you may be bewildered by the options
available now. The last five years have seen the average monitor’s feature
list swell to ...









Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 06-2016