Even when you're running non-vr stuff through the headset in virtual desktop,
it seems fine. Playing Diablo was no real issue. No eye strain or anything.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of Wynand-Ben
Sent: 28 October 2016 11:11 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
If you look at or try most VR games you will see that most of it is very
chilled.
Comfort and eye fatigue are taken seriously by most companies. Most flashy
effects dont work that great in VR and are toned down.
I just dont see it being a greater risk than normally.
Unless you are playing something that would already be good epilepsy trigger
even without VR.
If there are any risk just being sensible with what you play should sort it.
Chronos or Lucky's Tale would super comfy. Dont see them causing any issue.
Redout aka Wipeout in VR. Stay away and dont try if you have epilepsy... or
prone to motion sickness for that matter.
And stay away from most early access or indy type stuff on steam since they are
frequently experimental and the same amount of care about visuals and comfort
arent quite there compared to bigger titles
My 2c
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 10:49 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
Well, the visual cortex interperating images can lead to an attack. The cortex
relies on images from the eyes, which naturally include things like your
surroundings for perspective. It stands to reason then, that if stimulus from
a small area within field of view can cause an attack, it would be riskier if
the stimulus is coming from the only thing in your field of view.
That's my opinion anyway.
Your brain tends to do 2 things for vision other than the basics.
Map an image together, and find patterns.
Those 2 are the biggest issue for VR imo, at least concerning epilepsy.
Again. I'm no expert.
On 28 Oct 2016 10:37, "Wynand-Ben"
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I havent personally looked into epilepsy but I have read quite a bit about how
VR effects people.
Vision calibration issues, motion sickness etc.
I have never seen Epilepsy mentioned to be any worse than gaming on a normal
screen.
From what I understand all the stuff that would trigger it in normal game would
do it in VR as well.
If the epilepsy risk is any worse in VR I have never seen it mentioned
anywhere... I didnt specifically look into this tho.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 10:30 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
I would not recommend anybody with a history of epilepsy try VR unless they
have a failsafe plan.
I'm with you on this Rich.
It's not worth having a seisure for a VR experience.
On 28 Oct 2016 10:26, "Di Lhong"
<marongdin@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
VR is the best. Tekken 7 is going to have VR option. View your losing 360
degree lolz
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Di Lhong
<marongdin@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Happy Birthday Salie!
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:22 AM, richard moorcroft
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
So,, how is this epic fail?
On 28 Oct 2016 10:21, "Wynand-Ben"
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Epic Fail
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of richard moorcroft
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 10:18 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
No i didn't try it,, I was not up for getting a possible epileptic episode , I
am scared shitless dude,, I still think VR is shit idea,, don't care how
realistic it is,, for me that stuff is dangerous,, anyways ,, GB had alot of fun
On 28 Oct 2016 10:14, "Wynand-Ben"
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
So you tried VR richard?
You still thing its a stupid idea?
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of richard moorcroft
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 08:10 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: King of Polony 2016
Canal walk,, me and GB went,, it wasn't that big,, it was fun,, and there were
3 VR stations,, everyone wanted to do this 1 game ,, horror game,, GB waited a
hour in line for that game,, more than a hour maybe, there are no fighting
games though,, but there is a good ST cabinet and a few other cabinets with a
few hundred games on them
On 28 Oct 2016 08:07, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir"
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Where is this expo anyhow?
On 28 Oct 2016 08:04, "richard moorcroft"
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Is there gonna be a session tomorrow?? Or are we going to the expo tomorrow
rather??
On 27 Oct 2016 21:59, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir"
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Scheduled to arrive at 14:00 tomorrow. See you at the airport.
On 27 Oct 2016 16:11, "Moshe Shevel"
<jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
It's MN 0103
On 27 Oct 2016 17:04, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir"
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
What's your flight number Jag?
On 27 Oct 2016 15:37, "Moshe Shevel"
<jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Ok great, that is a slight relief!
Yeah, I'll be on my SA passport so hopefully that will help as well.
Hopefully someone will be doing that to delay the plane for me as well
On 27 Oct 2016 16:33, "Donaldson, Alasdair"
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
There is more than enough crap at the airport to fertilise their plants without
my aid.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of Stephen Scheidel
Sent: 27 October 2016 03:31 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
They weren't delayed.
Stu was just detained for taking a dump in a potplant at departures.
On Thursday, 27 October 2016, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
The last 4 flights between Jo'burg and Cape Town that I've caught in the past
month have all been delayed. Maybe you'll be lucky like me and have more time
to catch your flight.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Moshe Shevel
Sent: 27 October 2016 03:24 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
So there's a slight possibility that I may miss my flight to CT. At the moment
I only have 58 minutes to catch my connecting flight to Joburg... I'll try
update you guys if I made it :/
On 27 Oct 2016 15:45, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir"
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I could recommend it.
The bag was built for gamers like us.
Well, pad players anyway :P
On 27 Oct 2016 13:39, "Ilitirit Sama"
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hmmm R300 price difference at Takealot. Decisions decisions.
http://www.takealot.com/everki-beacon-18-gaming-notebook-backpack/PLID42117634
http://www.takealot.com/everki-titan-laptop-backpack-fits-up-to-18-4-inch-screens/PLID27300789
Apparently these are basically
top-of-the-range-recommended-by-the-entire-internet level bags.
I wonder if I can't buy them offline.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
@salie
https://www.everki.com/products1/18-4-laptop-bags/beacon-laptop-backpack-w-gaming-console-sleeve-fits-up-to-18-detail
On 27 Oct 2016 13:30, "Ilitirit Sama"
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
@Nic:
Is this the back you have:
https://www.everki.com/products1/backpacks/titan-checkpoint-friendly-laptop-backpack-fits-up-to-18-4-detail
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Moshe Shevel
<jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I arrive tomorrow afternoon, still need to figure out the details of getting
airtime and such. Hopefully the WiFi will be good enough at the hotel
On 27 Oct 2016 10:56, "lindsey kiviets"
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I havent seen alota Alice footage.
Leona is good because of her long limbs similar to beni, also v slasher
prevents you from jumping at her. she dies to hop pressure and because she's a
charge character you will be vulnerable to hops.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Sameegh Jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 27 October 2016 07:44 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
Alice has some nice hard knockdown options though so you've got safe jumps for
days. I like the idea of continued pressure as opposed to once off big damage.
I've always liked Leona's character design. Earring seems so slow whenever I
see it which is why I've never thought about using it. Maybe I should watch
some vids to see how it's done.
On 27 Oct 2016, at 9:13 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
leona is good choice. When she throws ex earring bomb the situation becomes
like in guilty gear. where you do something, while doing something else.
This is how to play Alice: pick someone else. she is not good. i dunno if they
fixed some of her hitbox issues. coz GB showed us a video where she gets a
confirm, does climax and then it completely wiffs. maybe the patch fixed her
abit.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Sameegh Jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 27 October 2016 07:01 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
He does seem like he suits your style of play, some nice rushdown pressure
options with those low hops and the stomp mixups.
I think I want to pick up Leona and Alice at some point. I should probably work
on Ralph first though.
On 27 Oct 2016, at 8:33 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Morning peeps,
My new char is gna be gang il.
all the videos ive seen about him makes him look op with his stomp kuk. no more
zoning when he's in ex mode. no more blocking low because of his overheard into
combo. no more blocking low because of BC bypass cancel.
more jump hops into combos
more mkx style hi lo mixups
gg SNK
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 26 October 2016 03:49 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
I see.
Good explanation, thanks.
I noticed it when I saw a Maxima combo where air EX vapor cannon juggled into
super. I couldn't do it until I watched the vid again and saw "counter" on
first hit.
Vice has an any-state airborn attack.
no matter what you are doing, hard knockdown, recovery... it just gets you.
On 26 Oct 2016 17:30, "Ilitirit Sama"
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Sometimes counter hits change the Juggle Points. So on normal hit if you have
a JP of 1, it means that after 1 more hit while the opponent is airborne, you
get nothing. Counter-hits sometimes increase the JP to like 3 or so. In
Vanilla SFIV, Ken's EX DP had infinite juggle points, which was interesting cos
it set the opponent on fire. Each time you juggled, the opponent got darker
and darker. As if they were being overcooked.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
It is. It is also distance-to-wall dependant.
Weird shit happens on counter. Stuff that should whiff hits.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Maybe I should try again
Both normal and heavy VC does the same wall bound it seems but for some reason
I couldnt really hit anything usefull after the heavy(armored) VC.
I could jab them for an air reset... perhaps the df+C timing was just tight.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 05:10 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
It has changed to a counter wire (wall bound)
You can df+C, dp+D
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Screwed around with those but cant remember the damage numbers... but what I
tried mostly boiled down to
CH VC, VC + optional super
CH VC, df+C, VC + optional super
CH VC df+C, DP airgrab
Couldnt find anything usefull of counter heavy VC. Thing is a very long
recovery :(
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 05:01 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
F Robotboy tho.
Counterhit VC combo 35% damage.
On 26 Oct 2016 16:53, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir"
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Make that a "no, you cannot"
On 26 Oct 2016 16:51, "Wynand-Ben"
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hmmm
Cant remember if you can continue the combo after air EX VC if hit an airborn
opponent...
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 04:48 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
You can also combo from EX VC to air EX VC.
On 26 Oct 2016 12:50, "Wynand-Ben"
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
You can combo after air EX VC yea
Not sure about that height tho. Its possibly but tricky if you hit close
enough to the ground to hit an actual crouching person
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 12:47 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
have u tried ex air VC?
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 26 October 2016 10:44 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
Bit less useful than makoto axekick tho.
Cant do it on crouching opponent straight up. (They need to block air C first)
Cant combo after it hits either
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 12:19 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
as long as u dont use that number kuk then its cool.
hop A into VC is gna be something similar to makotos instant axe kick.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 26 October 2016 10:15 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
My notations for this game is fucked.
No idea what the standards are so end up mixing shit together :P
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 12:06 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
Yeah, LB, good thinking.
I expect that's how he's going to get max damage.
Air vapor cannon somewhere.
On 26 Oct 2016 12:01, "lindsey kiviets"
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
air 1?
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 26 October 2016 09:56 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
Yea, sadly Maxima only has 1 ex move that allows a followup.
So its usually just
EX vapor cannon, vapor cannon, super
If spacing allows you can sometimes squeeze a df+C in between
Had a look at some cool looking fuzzy guard type shit that im not sure if it
works.
Blocked air C, land, air 1 into air Vapor cannon.
Blockstun seems like it could force the opponent to block jump 1 into vapor.
Will have to test properly. Seems like it worked when telling the AI to crouch
and guard all.
Not sure what would happen if the opp was crouch blocking after the 1st block
of Air C.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 11:28 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
Yup, it's true.
The only exception is where you can do a really long quickmax combo that uses 3
ex moves, then use the lvl2, then climax.
On 26 Oct 2016 11:25, "Wynand-Ben"
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Screwed around in practice mode with Maxima a bit.
Unless you want to blow all your meter for a kill his Climax seems like a waste.
In almost every situation I tested just doing lvl1 super into lvl2 super does
more damage than his climax for the same amount of meter.
The few small exceptions are when the normal supers wiff.
No idea if this is normal. My other two characters cant really combo their
lvl1 into lvl2 supers nicely to compare damage
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 09:30 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
i like that team composition.
angel and nelson play very smiliar but they are different enough to make things
interesting.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 24 October 2016 07:27 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
Lumi plays 2002 scrub Ralph.
He makes it look pro.
Single hit confirms to super.
Jumping CD when it matters.
Ranged standing D
He kicked my ass using these basics.
I finally have my team set.
Nelson, Angel and Vice.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:07 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
nah manase, rich was talking about marvel not kof.
Lumi has decided to try out Ralf instead of K. he feels the nerf was too much.
I understand why SNK did it, coz atm K' had everything. Now they made it so
that he can do those things, but in certain situations and not in every
situation.
So they toned down his midscreen easy confirms and made them harder, but his
corner confirms are left the same. so if you get the corner SNK says, then you
deserve the damage, which makes sense.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 24 October 2016 06:57 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
Lumi's 2/3 characters also got bopt by the patch...
On 24 Oct 2016 08:54, "richard moorcroft"
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Yea man,, your characters got bopt but it helped Lumi too,, so Jag comes this
Saturday?
On 24 Oct 2016 08:22, "lindsey kiviets"
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
sort of prep i suppose.
Lumi has his combos down. His execution hasnt aged a day.
im guessing khan and cgj are out of the meeting, i dont think they play
fighting games anymore.
So im guessing its gna be between lumi and jag.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> Sent: 24
October 2016 06:13 AM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: King of Polony 2016
So prepping for Jag's arrival with the Mahvel then? Sat around doing very
little that was noteworthy.
Watched a BBC series called Andrew Marr's History of the World. It was pretty
cool.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets Sent: 24 ;
October 2016 08:09 AM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016
On saturday i played some gg kof and marvel. Marvel is same like falling off
a bike, its pretty easy. kof was K. the game is very balanced now, you can
see where the opponents strength lies and its exploitable. Also new walking
dead season is starting tonight. i wana see who negan off'd. From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> Sent: 24
October 2016 06:00 AM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: King of Polony 2016 Meh. Another aimless week. Anything
important happen over the weekend? From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets Sent: 23 ;
October 2016 09:38 PM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016 Best video for explaining how to play kof
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OshK7purno ;<image001.jpg> KOF XIV - Basic
Mixups. www.youtube.com<http://www.youtube.com> Feel free to ask questions.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> Sent: 22
October 2016 08:37 AM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: King of Polony 2016 Wow, this is beautiful.
http://www.foxnews.com/travel/2016/10/21/sculptors-demonic-baby-jesus-statue-restoration-sparks-internet-ridicule.html
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben Sent: 21 October ;
2016 03:03 PM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject:
Re: King of Polony 2016 Ive been so tempted to grab it... I quite enjoyed
Civ 5 But im not thaaaat big of a fan to spend R900 on a PC title. Wish they
would lover the price a bit. New Dues Ex and No Mans Sky both cost the same
price in dollars but where R500 and R600 on steam. Will grab when its a bit
cheaper. From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> Sent: 21
October 2016 12:50 PM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: King of Polony 2016 Anyone planning on saying goodbye to the
outside world for a few weeks? http://store.steampowered.com/app/289070 The ;
information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is
intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is
unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please address
with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then
delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted
to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions
or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions
and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. KPMG
cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. This email is being sent out by KPMG
International Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG
member firm providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a
network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm
can be obtained from your KPMG representative. This footnote also confirms that
this e-mail message has been swept by AntiVirus software. The information in
this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended
solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.
If you have received this communication in error, please address with the
subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete
the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or
advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions
and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. KPMG
cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. This email is being sent out by KPMG
International Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG
member firm providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a
network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm
can be obtained from your KPMG representative. This footnote also confirms that
this e-mail message has been swept by AntiVirus software.
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
**********************************************************************
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
