Uhhh,, look,,, if the game is fun I won't have a problem,, they have made
alot of improvements,, would you rather play the game as it looked like in
the first trailer?? Or as it looks now?? PICK 1 PLEASE
On May 12, 2016 8:09 AM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
no the gfx is a problem.
I find it hard to play an ugly game.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of richard moorcroft <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 12 May 2016 06:08 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Wow,, very short response,,, not what I expected,, so is auto combo the
problem then??
On May 12, 2016 8:03 AM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-_-
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of richard moorcroft <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 12 May 2016 06:01 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
So just because you see Daimons eyes pop out you think the game is kak??
Cause that's what I think you are thinking
On May 12, 2016 6:45 AM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Morning peeps,
The game looks kuk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gSaoSUwH-I
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gSaoSUwH-I>
KOF XIV : TEAM GAME PLAY TRAILER #1 “JAPAN”
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gSaoSUwH-I>
www.youtube.com
“KOF XIV” official website: http://www.snkplaymore.co.jp/us/games/kof-xiv/
©SNK PLAYMORE CORPORATION ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
I see while in max mode you can do ex moves.
LOL <http://imgur.com/0CqxYft>
<http://imgur.com/0CqxYft>
http://imgur.com/0CqxYft
<http://imgur.com/0CqxYft>
Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet <http://imgur.com/0CqxYft>
imgur.com
Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 11 May 2016 04:20 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
MKX!!!
Lady Bug is ready.
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, looking to have the next CTS in August... planning stages. Game
release may change everything though.
I already have R1500 from CTS donars for prize money.
On 11 May 2016 17:25, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
...and how.
I struggle to play the game. It's control makes FOTNS:KR feel dynamic.
To me it feels like there are times the game is just ignoring inputs.
Mind you, I've felt that about the MK series since MK2.
MK9 felt like it was coming back to form, but I feel it lost the path a
bit in MKX.
I'll do what the players ask for. All groups.
On 11 May 2016 15:58, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
According to Nick, the response for MKX at CTS7 was overwhelming.
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
MKX is about the only thing that bring in additional players, right?
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 11 May 2016 04:54 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
alpha 3
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 11 May 2016 01:51 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
At this point I'm up for anything that will attract new players. Even
MKX.
I feel so dirty now.
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
By the way guys what invitational are we feeling for the weekend
session?
On 11 May 2016 15:46, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No -_-
If anything, HF is the "definitive" version of SF. There's very
little luck involved. OGs hated ST at first because you could win with
sheer luck.
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 3:13 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
CE and HF have cult followings, but they are boring to observe.
ST however captures the essence of sf with skill and a little luck you
can beat anyone.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 11 May 2016 01:09 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
ST is one of the *least* polished fighters out there. It probably has
the worst engine in the SFII series.
And when I say SFII, I mean all of them, including WW (which is
understandably broken). But CE and HF are still legit games.
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:52 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
its kinda unfair to compare st(polished product) to sf5(unpolished).
Theres been many changes and versions of sf2 to refine the system.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of richard moorcroft <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 11 May 2016 12:46 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
So you don't like sf2??? Well the way I understand it so far
On May 11, 2016 2:37 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lol, even I'm not even that much of a hater.
I agree that the game is "dry" in the sense that there's not much
beyond the basics, but that's not even a problem. By this yardstick, SFII
is the driest fighting game ever made. What irks me that *even the
basics are diluted* in SFV, and everything else is stuff that I
really don't like in stoic FGs.
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:36 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yo Mike Z went in on his post.
http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2016/may/10/why-street-fighter-5-much-deeper-we-all-thought/#c969143
check #76
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
