It is him
But where for art thy themeseong....
'''ahem
Trompie eni boksombende ..alalala*mumble*.... en boesman die brak
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:42:35 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Man Trompie looks so much like my shithead brother used to.
On 6 October 2015 at 17:25, Ashraf Barendse <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
dammit, at 20 seconds in that Trompie vid, that bra ducked but he didn't do a
while rising move to punish.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I just blame Pot in general.
:D
On 6 Oct 2015 15:32, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I blame Pol Pot for the whole negative connotation of ‘intellectual’.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ilitirit Sama
Sent: 06 October 2015 03:30 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Hello
You don't have to be smart to understand them all of them. Just need a bit of
general knowledge.
It's also interesting how the title of the article says "smart" instead of
"intellectual" like it actually says on the list. The word "intellectual" has
negative connotations, so many publications avoid using it.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:24 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
not a lot.
the roman one was cool with the 5 beers.
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 15:20:24 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Oh and I've got a new hobby now. I find silly puzzles that take no brainpower
and post it on random forums with captions like "Einstien predicted that only
10% of the people on the World would be abel to solve
this puzzle. Are you in the top inteligence bracket?"
How many of those jokes did you understand LB?
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:13 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://www.sunnyskyz.com/blog.php?blogid=240%2F20-Jokes-Only-Very-Smart-People-Will-Understand
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:50:06 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
It was always terrible. The first time I heard it I thought the machine's
speakers were busted. Then I just realized it just sounds bad in general. The
sampled effects are overdriven and of low quality.
The x68k version sounds much better.
Arcade:
http://vgmrips.net/packs/pack/final-fight-cp-system
x68k
http://vgmrips.net/packs/pack/final-fight-sharp-x68000
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
It sounds terrible NOW... When it came out it was fqn awesome.
I still like the horrible Final Fight sfx.
On 6 Oct 2015 13:48, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No. Just no.
In other news, in my quest to play all interesting arcades games since the year
1984, I've finally reached 1994. Alien vs Predator.
I've also came up with a theory that music production also has a sort-of
Uncanny Valley. There's a period where there's a big advancement in audio
technology, but the hardware advancement isn't really enough
to deliver the producer's vision. You can hear it clearly in arcade games
that came out say after 1988. Everyone was switching to synthesized and
resampled audio just because they could, but in reality the end product sounded
terrible. It seemed like they
were more concerned with demoing the hardware features than producing good
audio (the arcade version of Final Fight is a good example - it sounds
terrible). Whereas during the previous generation it seemed the producers just
tried to produce get music and
effects.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:36 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
f u I don't work at SARS.
But I will apply the SARS circular logic all the same.
He pressed wrong twice? is that what you saying?
you saying the third time it could've been different?
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:11:32 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
If you accept my assessment that there's no way you can believe that it's 50/50.
Damn SARS employees...
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:06 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I accept your assessment however i find it hard to believe that a guy who can
TP through fireballs has a hard time throwing out of a tick throw.
methinks that situation is 50/50 and u r basically done when in that situation.
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:41:18 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
1. Not ended up in that situation in the first place.
2. Timed his throw properly.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:48 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
what could the balrog have done differently in that situation
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:40:49 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
The player in blockstun can throw immediately while the person performing the
tick throw has to wait a few frames. There are situations where it's a
complete 50/50, or where it's impossible to escape using a throw because the
aggressor
has a better throw range, but that isn't one of them.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:16 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
how would the balrog escape that kuk vortex?
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:12:53 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reversal throws cannot be thrown because you cannot throw someone for something
like 10f after wake up.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:58 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
when u throw at the same time and the game selects a winner at random does not
constitute a reversal throw.
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 10:52:30 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
It does have reversal throws.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:15 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
if the game had reversal throws it would be a fair game.
look how cheaply the game ended. :(
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 00:36:02 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
LB we need to play HF
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0Fr5IBBVL4
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
