Congrats Lumi. All the best for you and the new member of your family.
Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Sameegh Jardine<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 2015-09-16 09:08
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
Aneesa gave birth a few hours ago, I'm officially a family man :]
On 16 Sep 2015, at 6:35 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umRxr00H60c
GB putting in work
________________________________
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 02:05:45 +0200
Subject: RE: Hello
From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks bro :) Always nice to get different perspectives on these games.
On 16 Sep 2015 00:02, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir"
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Pros:
Introduction of new characters.
A change in use of meter that was interesting. It allowed super cancels or
specific move launches.
Nests Style Kyo. Charge style Robert.
The stages were nice too.
Cons:
The striker system didn't appeal to me tbh
No one played it because you had to cheat-code to get Kyo/Iori.
Peeps who finished the game with one go knew the codes.
So, the game didn't attract "nubs to bop"... prolly.
Bao.
On 15 Sep 2015 20:32, "Ryan Williams"
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
*LOL* So because it wasn't 98, that made it bad? :P
@Nic, what in your opinion makes 99 good?
On 15 Sep 2015 20:29, "lindsey kiviets"
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
it wasnt 98 and too many clone kuk
________________________________
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:56:15 +0200
Subject: RE: Hello
From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I'm a KOF nub. What made KOF99 bad?
On 15 Sep 2015 19:09, "lindsey kiviets"
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
kof99 was quite bad.
3d kof's dont count. if you have your doubts just look at the trailer again.
after 2003 no 3d kof is listed.
@ogrs, neowave didnt work coz it had 5 buttons. kof doesnt need a heat button ,
f heat buttons tsek.
________________________________
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:10:58 +0200
Subject: RE: Hello
From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
99 was good, didn't have staying power.
3D KOF does count, arcade release, and 2006 monniker.
If you have your doubts, just look at the new kof14?
Neowave was an unknown.
On 15 Sep 2015 17:35, "lindsey kiviets"
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
you see your list is similar to mine but its flawed. when you have good 99 and
good 98.
kof3d's dont cound coz nobody cares about them. Jessica alba should never be in
any kof.
as i recall kofx is not kof 10. thy started with the numbers after 2003.
Neowave could be included in the list but it deservers rather an honorable
mention than an inclusion in the kof list.
________________________________
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:48:18 +0200
Subject: RE: Hello
From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
94 good
95 good
96 not so good
97 good, but broken
98 good
99 good
2000 super broken
2001 utterly super broken
2002 good
2003 rubbish
Maximum Impact - interesting, not terrible
Maximum Impact 2/2006 - no longer interesting... turned into a fashion show.
Now terrible
Maximum impact 2 Regulation A - feels even less like KOF, sabaki tier terrible.
Maximum Impact 2 Regulation A 2 - arcade port of the game above (iirc)
KOFX/Neowave - Like 2002 with extra characters, style changes. Good on PS2.
KOFXI - good, PS2 one had characters that were fun in a un-kof way.
KOFXII - half arsed unfinished and trying to be SF4. I like it, but it's not
good.
KOF13 - good
On 15 Sep 2015 13:51, "lindsey kiviets"
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
im in for Saturday december
@manase,
98 good
99 kuk
00 good
01 kuk
02 gud
03 kuk
11 good
12 kuk
13 good
do you see a pattern here?
14 kuk
15 good --> best kof ever
________________________________
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:47:33 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fellas, UCON is the 5th and 6th of December this year.
Sat/Sun
Which days do you guys feel like attending?
On 15 Sep 2015 13:43, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir"
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
It's because they were cutting corners to begin with and were on the fence
about 2d/3d.
Building a 3D rig and then re-drawing it was twice the work.
The Guilty Gear Xrd style is the new 2D.
SNK... profound Sadness :'(
On 15 Sep 2015 13:25, "Stephen Scheidel"
<gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Yeah I think a few people had annurisms trying to get all the sprite work done
for the last kof.
On Tuesday, 15 September 2015, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
the rule only starts from 98
________________________________
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:12:09 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
97 wasn't bad.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:07 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
this kuk looks like that kuk on the ps2 which I would rather not mention.
Didn't I tell you guys....
every other kof SNK makes is complete kuk.
Heres to kof15 guys.
________________________________
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:21:07 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Even though it's a teaser I do agree with SAP. They should have waited till
they had something more substantial.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You don't get anything extra for legendary other than pretty skin and effects.
It has the same stats as Ascended item.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:51 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I do, but you are going to have to farm sometime.
ugh!!!!!!!!!!!!
________________________________
From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Hello
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 08:45:14 +0000
Pay to win?
You’re in there then, LB.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Di Lhong
Sent: 15 September 2015 10:36 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Hello
Lol you can also buy those stuff instead. So if you want them super
early...you're gonna spend gold.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:09 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
yo Di, fk legendaries man. wtf. you see the requirements on those things?
its fkn insane. you need to farm 2 years straight at least. nah fk dis game.
________________________________
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 23:31:43 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: marongdin@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Wow.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Someone on Eventhubs linked to this gem:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Xw5wjwVkFc
This man's combo and oki game is on another level.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So I just found out that the Sharp X68000 was the development machine for many
(all?) Capcom CPS1 games. So many of the titles on the machine are virtually
arcade perfect. Whats more, the quality of the soundtracks are often of *much*
better quality. The arcade version of Final Fight for example sounds like crap
compared to the X68000 version because it uses very low quality samples.
What's more you can switch the sound modules so that you can hear what the
tracks sound like using different synths.
Now I feel like I've been ripped off lol.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
**********************************************************************
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
========================================================================You are
subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
//www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
