Ah ok, so it's because of the pushback that it doesn't work.
On 27 Aug 2015 19:20, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, the pushback on lights is higher to prevent hit-confirms. That's why
doing cr.lp, cr.lp into throw always loses to jab. You need to walk
forward for days.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Moshe Shevel <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Ah ok, that makes sense. Although is that even possible cos on block I
know you get tons of push back from doing s.lp not too sure about c.lp
though, will have to check.
On 27 Aug 2015 18:41, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what Salie was saying to LB about being ableto poke your way out of anything
Throws are now 4f (in SFIV they were 3f) and you need to be closer to
land them. Normals are generally negative on block. So if you do cr.lp xx
cr.lp into throw, you will lose everytime if the other guy is mashing jab.
If you try to frame trap you will also lose.
Birdie won't really have this problem because he doesn't need to go for
close-up pressure.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Moshe Shevel <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I'm actually enjoying the Beta. The game feels very fluid although
having those random stops on hit kind of get annoying sometimes. Loving
Birdie, Nash is pretty cool as well. Didn't use the rest of the cast but
from playing against them they seemed to be pretty cool, especially Chun Li
and her V-trigger.
I'm not sure I understand what Salie was saying to LB about being able
to poke your way out of anything, unless it's because I'm using Birdie and
he kind of trades speed for reach and power.
Hopefully they'll add Necalli to the Worldwide Beta on Friday, looking
forward to trying him out.
On 27 Aug 2015 18:19, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Play the game before deciding whether you like it or not. I'm posting
my opinions based on observation. I questioned LB's thoughts about the
game because he has also never played it, and I just posted some
counter-points.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:13 PM, richard moorcroft <
greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I thought SFV was gonna be cool when I saw the first gameplays,, but
after reading the mails that you posted Salie I think it's not gonna be
so
cool,, by the way ,, when is Cody gonna come to SFV??? He is too great a
character to not include in this game,, they better put him in soon
On Aug 27, 2015 5:06 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbDSvRMc9rQ
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Oops, forgot the link:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:gi1LyWaGlvcJ:www.gamekyo.com/blog_article370607.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
R.Mika confirmed?
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
wrote:
Let me put it like this LB, SFxTK doesn't have Focus Attacks,
(practical) Option Selects and you can stupid high damage.
Why aren't you playing that?
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Proximity OS? Show me one match where someone used it.
OS doesn't mean the CPU decides what to do for you... This is
just another urban legend that arose from so-called top players
trying to
explain things they don't understand.
You are basically arguing about things that you've maybe got hit
by less than 1% of all the times it would have been used against
you. But
what's even more ironic that the whole "OS" issue is exactly the
reason you
play Gief in ST -_-
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:33 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't read shoryuken.
it stands to reason if you have a dumbass mechanic that lets
the cpu decides the punishment then obviously that's kuk.
proximity kuk as well. tsek.
battle, read like a pro, guess like a gambler and fight like a
man
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:25:58 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
how many times ive been hit by an os on backdash isirrelevant the fact that's its there means you can do it and I
wouldn't
know if its a read or an OS.
So what? Why don't you just block? There about about 4 ways
to escape knockdown pressure in SFIV. OS might sound bad in
theory but
it's what saved SFIV. Don't rehash silly things that you saw
other people
post on the net.
if you read me good on you if you used an OS then its anexploit.
Buffering cr.mk into fireball is an exploit. What's your
point? Why not just play poker if you just want to gamble?
you have to guess between a throw or a fast crcouching attackthen its good
What I'm saying is that you don't have to guess. You can jab
your way out of anything in SFV.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:21 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
how many times ive been hit by an os on backdash is irrelevant
the fact that's its there means you can do it and I wouldn't know
if its a
read or an OS.
if you read me good on you if you used an OS then its an
exploit.
you have to guess between a throw or a fast crcouching attack
then its good. as long as you guessing all the time and not
leaving it to
the game to pick the correct answer then im good.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:07:25 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fair enough, but I can honestly say that I don't buy your
reasons. It's like you're just saying what you've read elsewhere.
How often have ever gotten hit by an OS in SFIV? You've
probably escaped pressure with noob-friendly backdashes and mashing
exponentially more often than you actually got punished with an OS.
Read backdash and punish with Ultra? Why would you do that?
Backdashes don't have hit invincibility. cr.lp into DP? That's
just not
going to happen unless you're mashing, but the fact that it's even
an
option on defense is a BAD thing.
Do you know how weak throws are in this game? Smaller range
and slower than SFIV. Not only that, but they removed kara throws
in the
latest build. Yes, read that again.
The game is SLOWER than SFIV at higher levels of play for
reasons I will elaborate on in my next mail about why I don't
think it's
such a good game.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:53 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't dislike the way it plays.
unlike sf4 where I disliked it right off the bat.
No OS. I don't like that you can cover yourself from different
eventualities depending on what the opponent does. You read
backdash into
ultra like a man. you read a throw or you get crlp into dp.
I like that you can build-a-combo with v-trigger. so you have
your normal bnb's but if you have v trigger you can add onto your
bnb.
No focus kuk, which ties into No OS paragraph coz you must
press a button and get opened up or get thrown.
Theres a stun gauge so more fraudulent wins are abundant.
easy combos can lead to big damage if you have meter.
faster recovery on knockdown. game looks faster than sf4.
I think that's about all I can gather.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:42:39 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
What makes you think it's a good game, LB?
Take your time.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:34 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
its a really good game.
takin it back to old school tactics with some new school
elements.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:33:23 -0700
Subject: Re: Hello
From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
I wanna play SF5 and see how it is
On Aug 27, 2015 2:40 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
KYS
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:36 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
salie get us a copy of sf5 pls.
I think this might be the best game
------------------------------
From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Hello
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:25:17 +0000
Hmmm. I can do, but really shouldn’t blame the IT department
for wanting me to spend the day doing actual work rather than
stuffing
around on random forums.
Yawn. Long day is long.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
*Sent:* 27 August 2015 2:23 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
@Stu check if this lets you access blocked sites:
https://getlantern.org/
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The new Transformers game looks neet!
ttps://youtu.be/wDQr4MgcE9o
On 27 Aug 2015 13:19, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
redrum
On 27 Aug 2015 12:30, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yup.
Now Nick can stare at the photo can cry himself to sleep
knowing that the pig is mine!
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft
*Sent:* 27 August 2015 12:20 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
Cute pig
On Aug 27, 2015 12:11 PM, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey Nick. Here is the photo of the pig that you asked for. I
put him nice and centre.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Nicholas
Robertson-Muir
*Sent:* 27 August 2015 11:40 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
Who is going to be at session this Saturday?
I see Youtube's online game streaming is on the roll.
I plan to check it out this evening.
On 27 Aug 2015 11:30, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Did GR45 with shenlong
Oh and I kinda like my Ancient spirit guards
------------------------------
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Hello
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:31:00 +0000
im sure I can do tx. I just couldn't do it with a double
stacked fd...
need dat spirit guards.
I was thinking of running innas with exploding palm.
------------------------------
From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Hello
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:27:47 +0000
Since he just said that he can’t do TX, I presume he means that
you and I run the TX bounties while he parks off in town.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
*Sent:* 27 August 2015 9:24 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
whut
------------------------------
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Hello
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:19:09 +0000
we should do tx bounties together rather than splitting up.
maybe the yield vs time is better than running split t6.
------------------------------
From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Hello
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:13:39 +0000
Oh, for the mats for the cube, definitely run higher T as that
gives you more. Dunno about the ubers.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 27 August 2015 8:45 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
I tried tx and got bopt coz Ima leming and trying to double
stack fd's/.
:(
I need the new spirit guards.
I think rimeheart + super attack speed will work well.
what is the purpose of running ubers on greater difficulty when
they drop 2 materials on t6.?
------------------------------
From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Hello
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:37:30 +0000
On the weapon side, it’s important for crusader builds – those
flails or shields with specific abilities.
For everyone else, I dunno. What elements do you use? I’m
tempted to put together a frost leap-quake Barb and put Rimeheart
as the
weapon thing. Throw in the new iceblink gem and it’s looking much
better.
On the armour side, either the leap boots, or frostburn. Hmmm.
Actually a
straight HotA build using the same might be fun.
Did you try to fun normal/GRs? Ran a TX normal rift. Was fine.
Ran a 50 GR and it was fine. Didn’t die in either of those and
finished
with a couple of minutes to spare.
I needs the Hammerdin set.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 27 August 2015 8:04 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
Morning peeps,
I dunno how I feel about kanai's cube.
theres just too many possibilities.
Rrrog or unity !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
why cant I have both?
Also, besides a furnace what else can I extract?
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:09:36 -0700
Subject: Re: Hello
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yeah, he's a virtuoso.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Stephen Scheidel <
gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That guy is fucked up good though O_O
On 26 August 2015 at 19:58, Stephen Scheidel <
gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That's pretty cool.
I'm not really a fan of raw Uke but my "imagine percussion and
bass skills" are sufficient tier to enjoy it.
On 26 August 2015 at 19:35, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Watch Jake Shimabukuro do it on a Ukele
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puSkP3uym5k
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Stephen Scheidel <
gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Prince is such a G.
and also George Harrison for writing a sick treck.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SFNW5F8K9Y
On 26 August 2015 at 18:21, Ashraf Barendse <
ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I watched fantfourstic the other day. The best word to describe
it would be 'meh'
Also Doom looks like Aids.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:33 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
the cops are too stronk for magneto to resist.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:43:10 +0200
Subject: Re: Hello
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
How godlike are the graphics and animation in this short?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5-JVvCrGC8
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Put your bandanna on and go swapsies with the primary school
kids through the gap in the fence by the tree during 2nd break.
Wear sunnies and an overcoat too.
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dammit.
Want a piggy.
I got nothing to trade tho so I'll take what I can get.
Send me a pic of the pig would ya?
On 26 Aug 2015 09:32, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
@Nick – sorry, but I don’t have a spare of the piggy. Not
giving up my current one either. It seems to be the best one.
Got spares of Frankey, Cheezz, the cat, duck and giraffe.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 26 August 2015 8:46 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
f man I need a furnace too.
you don't need rrog?
------------------------------
From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Hello
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 06:39:08 +0000
Check your profile on battlenet – there is not a space to show
which kanai ability you have equipped.
Gonna start out vanilla – furnace/hexing/mara and see how much
it helps. Will stuff around with other ones later.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 26 August 2015 8:30 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
stu please try again later.
@paas, johnny doesn't look right without ensenga.
@salie, ogawa vs Daigo. O_o . Daigo does different wall combos
with sol.
------------------------------
From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Hello
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 06:15:12 +0000
So, new Diablo patch is out. Tried logging on this morning, but
no luck. Didn’t have much time to keep retrying.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
*Sent:* 26 August 2015 5:14 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
o_0?
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The command was lost in translation.
It is "2 Motions and Di". You do the motion twice and tap Di
on the head.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 6:47 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
lol that is funny.
Btw how can it be the super motion and D when Elphelt's cake
super is 2 motions and D.
it must be 2 buttons methink.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading
"Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and
destroy
any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or
advice
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed
in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not
relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself
as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local
KPMG member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading
"Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and
destroy
any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or
advice
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed
in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not
relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself
as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local
KPMG member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading
"Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and
destroy
any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or
advice
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed
in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not
relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself
as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local
KPMG member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading
"Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and
destroy
any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or
advice
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed
in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not
relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself
as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local
KPMG member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading
"Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and
destroy
any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or
advice
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed
in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not
relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself
as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local
KPMG member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading
"Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and
destroy
any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or
advice
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed
in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not
relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself
as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local
KPMG member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading
"Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and
destroy
any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or
advice
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed
in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not
relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself
as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local
KPMG member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.
