Dragons? I'm not even ready for mudcrabs.
Seriously, have you seen the size of those things?
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How about they change to Skyrim or something? I’m ready for some dragons.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
*Sent:* 14 May 2018 1:16 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
How about we only exist because some super advanced aliens are busy
jamming the next version of Civilization somewhere
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Monday, May 14, 2018 01:06 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Interesting discussion, too bad I don't have any input other than,
"reality only exists because we beleive it does".
- Nick.
On Mon, May 14, 2018, 11:19 Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hmmm. Thanks for that.
While the idea that time fails to hit the ‘gold standard’ of mathematics
(as they call it) is a problem, it could also be a problem of our
understanding/incomplete maths. That side of the argument doesn’t add
anything to my understanding other than the idea that time might not exist
because it seems a bit stupid compared to the rest of mathematically
defined reality.
I do like the idea of taking time out of the equation though. If point A
leads to point B, then easily enough from our understanding, point A is
before point B, assuming time exists. If time does not exist, then there is
no real A -> B other than what we know as governed by Thermo 2. That
doesn’t necessarily imply the existence of time, but through it we can
better define what time means to us.
Shifting from point B to point A isn’t a problem then, but I’m not sure
how this works in terms of popular time travel (i.e. what we’d want out of
it), you’d effectively need something outside of that system (object C)
that moved between point A and B.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
*Sent:* 14 May 2018 11:04 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
@Stu:
*For Gödel, if there is time travel, there isn’t time. The goal of the
great logician was not to make room in physics for one’s favorite episode
of *Star Trek*, but rather to demonstrate that if one follows the logic
of relativity further even than its father was willing to venture, the
results will not just illuminate but eliminate the reality of time*.
http://edwardfeser.blogspot.co.za/2018/05/godel-and-unreality-of-time.html
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__edwardfeser.blogspot.co.za_2018_05_godel-2Dand-2Dunreality-2Dof-2Dtime.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=ewU2cIETm9FHTqwfqmCUfiz75KpMsO8EPvPQagLvk8Q&s=JK03halA7Ee90Sd0YmdkBG4Zl0MQzRMJuDwu9rbdzb4&e=>
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Interesting question.
Here's my uninformed interpretation of the answer: Acceleration is a
vector that signifies the rate of change of velocity i.e it depends on time
and velocity. We know that time changes and velocity changes when time is
reversed due to T-Symmetry. The "change" implies reversal of sign i.e.
time and velocity both become negative. Since both variables change sign,
the resulting acceleration vector is the same (10 x 10 = 100; -10 x -10 =
100).
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
