Re: Hello

From: lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 06:47:17 +0000

we are already paying VAT on the games wtf more they want?

________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 12 October 2017 06:44 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Hello

Um...
They don't have any games listed under their classification stuff at all.
gtfo

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Lol, well good luck with that.
They should just close their SA stuff and switch to US.

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:25 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

https://mybroadband.co.za/news/gaming/232533-steam-must-pay-the-fpb-to-sell-games-in-south-africa.html

quick lol for anyone here atm

________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 11 October 2017 12:16 PM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello

These kind of aggregators or to a lesser degree pubic/user scores are useful as
guidelines only imo.

Stuff at the top end with the very high average scores would usually be
enjoyable almost anybody.

The further the scores drop the more "niche" it becomes you need to be a fan of
the concept or genre to appreciate it.

________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 02:11 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello

Good films by real filmmakers aren't made to be decoded, consumed or instantly
comprehended.

"No real scotsman"

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Ryan Williams
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Yeah, it's more the "film making as an art" bit that he was emphasising, which
I can certainly agree with. But yeah, RT definitely has it's uses. Laymen stand
to benefit a lot more from RT scores than modern-day Roger Eberts.

Personally, I watch what I feel like watching, regardless of how it's received
by RT or respected film critics. I would have missed out on a lot of good shit
otherwise (good, as far as I'm concerned).

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Ilitirit Sama
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
BTW, I disagree with Scorsese on RT.

RT (and even IMDB reviews) saved me from viewing dozens of trash movies.  Yeah
sure sometimes a few fall through the cracks, but you'll hear about them from
other people anyway.  And the duds that I do watch, well that's just part of
it.  At least it's only 1 or 2.  Not dozens.

Regarding his about about "film making as an art" vs film critics.yeah that's a
fair point.  But a bad with with good graphics is similar to a bad movie with
good cinematography IMO.

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Ilitirit Sama
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hmmm...  quite brief.

J/K.  You didn't post the link.  I found one:

http://www.newsweek.com/martin-scorsese-rotten-tomatoes-681497

He brought back the old boys for his new movie:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1302006/

De Niro, Pacino, Pesci, Keitel.  I have my reservations.  Apparently he bugged
Pesci for two years before he agreed to do the movie.

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Ryan Williams
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
*lol*

On a somewhat-related note, here's an interesting write-up by Martin Scorsese
concerning his thoughts on Rotten Tomatoes ratings vs professional film
criticism.

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Ilitirit Sama
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Some movie award for best supporting actress.  Nominees are shown.  Seth
MacFarlane comments "Congrats, you 5 ladies don't have to pretend to be
attracted to Harvey Weinstein any more".

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
For those of us who can’t access youtube?

From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of Ilitirit Sama
Sent: 11 October 2017 12:51 PM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCNvREKTnQc<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.youtube.com_watch-3Fv-3DKCNvREKTnQc&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=PVYVGJm039aEKa8C2-s9Hhb6uAeU-XBGJ5dz10CPHS4&s=LRpFVrd6g9fvByl8-eczNPrIfUpRSd6kjv7k4xcHRdU&e=>
Just a joke, or did everyone already know?

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
http://www.vulture.com/2017/10/after-harvey-weinstein-terry-crews-shares-his-own-story.html?utm_campaign=vulture&utm_source=tw&utm_medium=s1<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.vulture.com_2017_10_after-2Dharvey-2Dweinstein-2Dterry-2Dcrews-2Dshares-2Dhis-2Down-2Dstory.html-3Futm-5Fcampaign-3Dvulture-26utm-5Fsource-3Dtw-26utm-5Fmedium-3Ds1&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=PVYVGJm039aEKa8C2-s9Hhb6uAeU-XBGJ5dz10CPHS4&s=A9P6llerKqjIVS82fvG4Qd7ZMat_Up7weBMt0sN5p1Q&e=>

Okay, so you’re someone like Terry Crews, who could probably break me in half
without effort, and you’re still a victim of this? Also, this apparently
happened last year, so he wasn’t some unknown. Your average up and coming
actress must have it insanely worse.

From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
Sent: 11 October 2017 10:50 AM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello

after seeing what yuri can do with little to no meter

I think I mus bop you tonyt
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 11 October 2017 08:46 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello

You got a lady's number!

Achievement unlocked!

On 11 Oct 2017 09:44, "lindsey kiviets"
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Morning peeps,

so this SARS lady gives me here e-mail over the phone,

p for polony? yoh, I had a good chuckle

what is p for ?

________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 10 October 2017 02:37 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello

LB is best.

Here's that hot girl who had nudes posted....

Auntie Charmaine!!!!!

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 4:02 PM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

lol I would luv to meet anti Charmaine, shes cool.

________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 10 October 2017 01:57 PM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello

Tsek you pervert.  How about you join us on an FGC night then I'll introduce
you to her and Charmaine from 7th Avenue?

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 3:57 PM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

tsek with your non pic post.

pics or it didn't happen

________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 10 October 2017 01:53 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello

I can't post the full pics because it has some revealing info, but this is from
the first batch.  Seems like the explicit pics were removed.

[Inline image 1]

[Inline image 2]

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Ilitirit Sama
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Did Di ever tell you the time he met Russell Peters?
So Di is randomly telling us that he likes him as a comedian.  We walk into my
friend's venue and he greets the people sitting at the table.  Several minutes
later he tells me "Wow, this dude looks just like Russell Peters".

I give him the look

[Inline image 1]
It was Russell Peters.

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hang with Sawley

Be famous and have your shit fucked up fast.

I should hang with you more.

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Ilitirit Sama
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
So regarding the Harvey Weinstein thing...

First things first.  Anything below line may or may not be true.  Prefix every
sentence with "Allegedly"

I know this girl who is a part-time model.  She also does promotions for a
cigarette company at various events/clubs.  If you were with on the night of
Di's farewell you may have met her at Arcade (she was sitting on the table
closest to ours inside the place).  Anyway, one night while doing promotions
she met this extravagantly dressed American patron at some club.  He said he
worked for some famous people/company or whatever, and he invited her to some
actor's party in LA.  Leo di Caprio or Matt Damon or someone.  She took his
number but didn't really think much of it.  A week or so later she gets a call
from this guy's PA.  Her ticket has been booked and her invite was in the mail.
Turns out the dude is legit and she finds herself at some party in Hollywood.
She meets random people and this dude walks over to talk to her but she kinda
shrugs him off.  Apparently it was Harvey Weinstein.  She was talking to some
American girl at the time and this conversation ensued:

"OMG OMG like... like... do you EVEN know who that guy IS?"
"Nope"
"HARVEY WEINSTEIN!"
"Who's that!?"
"WTF?  Are you evens exist?  Google him!"
"I can't google him now.  I don't have air time" <- This is how you know it's a
true story.  Capetonian girls never have airtime.
Anyway, she finds out who he is, gets formally introduced by the guy who
invited her and then he offers her a job!  And that's about where the story
gets strange...  Now at this point I didn't know about any of this but she did
send me a message from Paris or London, saying that she's depressed because
none of her friends bothered to check up on her after she left the country.  So
I inferred that she left the country for an extended photoshoot or something,
but then I ran into her on the night of Di's farewell.  So I was "??? You
texted me two nights ago from a different city"  She didn't remember.  Was
obviously sky high on coke at the time.  Anyway then she tells me the whole
Weinstein/Miramax story.  And she shows me his private number on her phone.
I'm thinking "Why do you even have his private number!?"  But I don't say
anything.  A few nights later she tells me the rest of the story.  Turns out he
flies her (and the other "applicants") out to London every few weeks.  The
first time she landed immigration gave her issues.  She complained about this
and apparently he (Weinstein) told her "Don't say you're on business, say
you're visiting your boyfriend.  If they ask who, say it's me, and they can
call to verify).  Done.  She never has issues at immigration again.

Now this is where things get fucked up...
If you're on the FGC Whatsapp group you may or may not recall me posting about
my friend who had her nudes leaked on the net.  It was her.  Freaky texts and
nudes.  And I mean really explicit stuff.  The person on the side of the
conversation was never identified, but it's clear he was a foreigner.  He was
basically saying "Look I have a wife, but I'll fly you here and there.  So what
are you willing to do?".  Shit got really graphic.  She found out, her life was
nearly destroyed.  She got lawyers on it and the site was shutdown, but she's
not yet sure who leaked the images.  Miramax contacts her and says are deals
are off - they don't need the bad publicity.  After things died down they
contacted her again and asked if she's still interested.  She turned them down
because they didn't have her back during the time.  Or whatever.  I think she
was just trying to save face at that point (she denies the texts were real - I
saw the photos.  It was her for sure).
Anyway, what does all this mean?  Who knows.  But if even half of what she says
is true (flying to London, how she was offered the job), then it's likely
something similar happened to other people.  So the allegations of sexual
harassment don't really surprise me...

________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.

KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.

This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.

________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.

KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.

This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hello
  - From: Ilitirit Sama

References:
- Re: Hello
  - From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir
- Re: Hello
  - From: lindsey kiviets
- RE: Hello
  - From: Donaldson, Alasdair
- Re: Hello
  - From: Ilitirit Sama
- RE: Hello
  - From: Donaldson, Alasdair
- Re: Hello
  - From: Ilitirit Sama
- Re: Hello
  - From: Ryan Williams
- Re: Hello
  - From: Ilitirit Sama
- Re: Hello
  - From: Ilitirit Sama
- Re: Hello
  - From: Ryan Williams
- Re: Hello
  - From: Ilitirit Sama
- Re: Hello
  - From: Wynand-Ben
- Re: Hello
  - From: lindsey kiviets
- Re: Hello
  - From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir
- Re: Hello
  - From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir

Re: Hello

Other related posts: