that is some BS man.
is it for continuous professional development?
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 28 July 2017 05:46 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Hello
Man, on Wednesday I found out that was some compulsory training that I had to
attend over Thurs/Fri. I had some other work to do, but usually I’m okay with
going on training. It’s two days of parking off, listening to lectures, having
discussions and getting a free lunch.
Seems I was mistaken. There was course pre-reading and they’ve flown some guy
out from Italy to give the course. It is 90% maths based. We have to write an
exam for accreditation at the end. I’m too old for this crap.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of Manase Zote
Sent: 27 July 2017 7:28 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Hello
I agree with some comments on that article with the use of term 'incorrect'
game design instead of unconventional or unorthodox.
The game plays differently from the usual Mario games and that was the reason
many folks including myself loved the series.
On 27 Jul 2017 19:02, "Ilitirit Sama"
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
They article isn't saying it's a bad game. It's saying that it's good despite
going against "good" design practices.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Manase Zote
<bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Bullshit...
Sonic is a classic.
On 27 Jul 2017 5:14 p.m., "Ilitirit Sama"
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Interesting article about how Sonic the Hedgehog was designed "wrong"
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jul/27/why-sonic-the-hedgehog-incorrect-game-design<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.theguardian.com_technology_2017_jul_27_why-2Dsonic-2Dthe-2Dhedgehog-2Dincorrect-2Dgame-2Ddesign&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=zptVpcLNyMYDyJE6cPPGvhCKrqn-2u2jxpdxFqTDq_k&s=TSW4-7kqPfGW8UgTpbZVXmV0esCvk9vFXEGP2sUyr_E&e=>
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
