Do you think that maybe... he's trying to trick you?
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:58 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I sense a hint of snarcarsm
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 12:38 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
It would be nice if you guys stopped pretending that LB isn't the superior
fighting game player.
On Thursday, 27 July 2017, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But the Stu and Manase stuff was all offline... no online lag to throw
them off.
So it was just them being slow.
The moves afterwards are interruptible as per training mode(Tested with
stu on evo weekend) but in matches people(esp us non-pro gamers) dont react
fast enough all of the time.
We cant react consistently to 20-30frame lows but can against 13frame
df+1 attacks with low blockstun?
Especially if there is not a load of blockstun to help you realize what
you just blocked. (Like most df+1 attacks with some being even faster like
kazumi)
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Thursday, July 27, 2017 12:25 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Kazumi's df+1 is -3 on block. I thought it was -1 before just because
your jab would beat mine in that situation. I can chalk it up to being
"slow" the first time, sure; after the second or third, it's no longer a
matter of speed or reactions. Sometimes there's a case to be made for
"being slow", other times people have legitimate concerns. I mean, Stu,
Manase and I all had similar experiences. I think Stu even asked me what it
was on block because he said he couldn't beat it. Does that sound right to
you? Yoshi's is -4 on block. How the hell does his jab beat someone else's
in that situation?
I doubt it's because we're all slow. We all know what to do in that
situation. We're not scrubs. You can only be "slow" so many times.
Followups after a -3-on-block move should always be interruptible without
any issues. This is indisputable.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Reaction time "lies" tho
These things happen all the time offline simply because we are slow...
esp with quick recovery df+1 attacks like Kazumi. There is so little
blockstun/recovery on that move compared to Yoshi's df+1
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Thursday, July 27, 2017 08:36 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
*lol* Don't give me that bullshit please. Df+1 is always beatable
offline on block. If it isn't, the screen is at fault. The frames don't lie.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:33 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
kof's online is hot or miss, but tekken is the best netcode.
df1 mixup isn't really an issue because it works offline too
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 06:21 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Ok, let me add something into the mix here. Why is it that you beat me
online in KOF, but when we play offline, I beat you?
You maintain that it's one and the same thing, but the results say
otherwise.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:19 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
so you saying the results would've been the same if you played the
same set of games offline?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 06:16 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
You asking me? No, the first time I played online was the first time I
played against anyone. I didn’t feel the connection was the issue. I
played
about 20-30 games and one of them was bad with lag. The rest were fine. If
I lost, it was me.
Dunno about the lag on the other games (GG or KOF).
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@freelis
ts.org] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 8:10 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
when u lose online, in t7? do you feel like it was because of lag?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 05:52 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
So I was on the Skyrim reddit and there was an article about a guy who
boots up his brothers old copy of Skyrim just to look at the last thing he
was doing before he died. https://imgur.com/a/Gh20l
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__imgur.com_a_Gh20l&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=6PucL_gEgr3CAE8LRb_6SKkYmM_3xBwc6Lq4sCpBi0Q&s=RNXlzdxbhJDVMQyBVI6Vr0lIum2rld9bMWakRmeN6Gc&e=>
Found a few other links in the comments:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/entertainment/a8374/
son-finds-his-fathers-ghost-waiting-for-him-in-vintage-rally
-video-game/
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.roadandtrack.com_car-2Dculture_entertainment_a8374_son-2Dfinds-2Dhis-2Dfathers-2Dghost-2Dwaiting-2Dfor-2Dhim-2Din-2Dvintage-2Drally-2Dvideo-2Dgame_&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=6PucL_gEgr3CAE8LRb_6SKkYmM_3xBwc6Lq4sCpBi0Q&s=XJhvbl1qZ-H1gq5Ln3oMoy58eLutex9d-iiINwRo50M&e=>
and
http://www.duelinganalogs.com/comic/a-tear-jerking-story-abo
ut-animal-crossing/
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.duelinganalogs.com_comic_a-2Dtear-2Djerking-2Dstory-2Dabout-2Danimal-2Dcrossing_&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=6PucL_gEgr3CAE8LRb_6SKkYmM_3xBwc6Lq4sCpBi0Q&s=E6Arb7K318-jgDo4xrV5vl9nkMWIWBL2ehPqex9TVcg&e=>
Sniff…Oh, the feels…
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@freelis
ts.org] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 26 July 2017 4:03 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
wtf
lmao, das sounds great.
what time are people gna be there at EGE?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 July 2017 01:58 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Kum balls VS polony and mash
Paashaas VS LB cook-off lessgo!
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
with his balls?
on his balls?
over his balls?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 26, 2017 03:51 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
...off his balls
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
You coming on Sat?
Kum want to bounce some Johnny off the walls
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 26, 2017 03:48 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
its not 1f combos
its bnbs that every johnny mus know
anyone can do them with 12 hours training.
johnny on defence is not good, luckily his offence is great so I don't
really have to worry about blocking if I can spam 6H
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 July 2017 01:44 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
He is already like that. But it's not about the combos. It's how
"good" he is when recovers from dropped combos.
Button...button...motion...button *drops combo* MASH
MASH MASH MASH MASH MASH MASH MASH MASH (10 seconds later). Block
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
LB is going to become like that SF4 play salie posted, where guys are
losing irl because they can do 1 frame combos online, but not offline.
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:01 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
that's what I said, you take your damage and then you get out.
that damage can range from combos to pokes. point is, you don't stay.
last nyt u stayed. this was unconventional move.
I had to grab u
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 July 2017 11:58 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
What's funny about you saying "take your damage and run" is that I've
beaten you with BC combos before. Explain to me how that constitutes
running?
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:43 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
baiken is not a gud character, nobody plays her.
she has to take any dmg she can get.
@sap, please play like you would normally. don't stay. take your dmg
and run.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 July 2017 11:17 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
You can LB'ify any statement by just appending " like a bitch"
"You use those tatamis to run away like a bitch"
"You use those tatamis to rush me down like a bitch"
"You use those tatamis to hit-confirm like a bitch"
True story.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
