The only chars I play in GG are Baiken and Venom, and I suspect Venom will
be considerably harder to play online.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:59 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
its time to switch man
I admire your kuk character loyalty
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 08:57 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
It's a worthless combo ender. At the point where you'd rather end with jD
or Yozansen the moves do 1 or 2 points damage, and jD will be practically
guaranteed while Yozansen can whiff and leave you punishable.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:34 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
it cant be used as a combo ender ?
rather than going for jD you do yozansen?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 08:31 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
whats the purpose of yozansen
Welcome to that Baiken life. You can ask yourself this about a lot of
her moves.
And yes, Yozansen is the only mixup tool she has, and it's not even
really good unless she has meter.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:16 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
whats the purpose of yozansen, you never do it anywhere else other than
on my wake up to get damage if I wake up blocking low?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 08:08 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
On purpose. 2HS low profiles Johnny's supers. I ate way too many
supers from Khan before I figured that out. It's too hard for her to
attack without a move like that because Johnny's What's my name super beats
Yozansen and just about everything else besides jumping clean over it,
which lets him get away for free.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:03 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
u did 2HS is invincible?
3 times I did treasure hunt on you and all the times it wiffed because
of 2HS? wtf?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 07:57 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
They were way too many. Myself and Khan played till after 3am. I
recorded the one where you IK'd me, but I didn't upload it yet.
That match is a good demonstration of one of the many issues with
Baiken's Azami. Toward the end I did raw Super with the intention of
countering your followup. I got Faultless Defense instead. They should do
something those inputs, and they should remove Azami out of guard as well.
It's a major liability.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:54 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
did you upload our matches?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 07:52 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
"Please don't try to trick me when we play fighting games"
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:41 AM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
nah online, andy was 2nd, offline he was sommer first wtf?
u tried to trick me
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 07:37 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Except that when I played you offline, I played exactly the same way
I do online? Then you took issue with it? I can't win in this argument
*lol*
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:21 AM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
play style has everything to do with it.
if you play one way online and offline its something else, it has an
effect.
I wasn't expecting it.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 07:15 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
LB, I lose to you plenty online, and play style has nothing to do
with it. Changing things up every once in a while really shouldn't have
that much of an impact on the end result if you've got a good handle on
how
someone plays. I lose to a lot of players online all the time. This
isn't a
new thing for me. My point is that I beat you convincingly offline. Your
view is that the better player will win regardless of whether the
matches
are played online or offline. Why, then, do I beat you offline? I'm
still
waiting for an answer to that question.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:04 AM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
the online set was a close one, you should've won. I have
emphasised that before.
I told you, you lose online, coz you didn't play to your strength
at the end.
you went in and stayed, which isn't usually what you do.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 06:58 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
On Saturday, I'm just going to repeat what you said.
"Play to your strengths"
"Lag isn't a factor"
And you still dodged my question about why I beat you offline and
not online. Shouldn't the "better" player *always* win, according
to your logic?
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:55 AM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Also you didn't play like you usually played online, that is also
a big contributor of me losing.
if you played like you usually play online then the results
would've been different.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 06:51 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Whatever you say LB.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:48 AM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
so tekken online is good, not great. that's about it.
the better players will usually win, same like offline.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Ryan Williams <
ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 06:44 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Fortunately, I know that my screen is not at fault, because I
test this shit extensively. Most df+1s range from -1 to -5 on block.
In
some cases, df+1s can become 0 on block which is usually range
dependent
(Master Raven's df+1 functions like this). When I test this offline,
counter jab always wins in that situation. There is no middle ground.
I was helping that new Eddy player on Discord with Tekken basics.
I tried to demonstrate to him how 1 can be used to force people to
crouch
because it is +1 on block and can't be interrupted by the opponent's
jab.
He was able to interrupt me a few times because lag plays a factor.
In an
offline setting, he wouldn't be able to interrupt with a jab in that
situation at all.
Let's stop spewing bullshit and start looking at the facts please.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:38 AM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
so when the screen is at fault and you playing online , then you
really in a pickle?
amiryt?
online is good, my johnny is like top tier because of online.
the results would be the same online and offline. in kof and gg.
gg
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Ryan Williams <
ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 06:36 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
*lol* Don't give me that bullshit please. Df+1 is always
beatable offline on block. If it isn't, the screen is at fault. The
frames
don't lie.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:33 AM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
kof's online is hot or miss, but tekken is the best netcode.
df1 mixup isn't really an issue because it works offline too
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Ryan Williams <
ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 06:21 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Ok, let me add something into the mix here. Why is it that you
beat me online in KOF, but when we play offline, I beat you?
You maintain that it's one and the same thing, but the results
say otherwise.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:19 AM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
so you saying the results would've been the same if you played
the same set of games offline?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Donaldson,
Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 06:16 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
You asking me? No, the first time I played online was the
first time I played against anyone. I didn’t feel the connection
was the
issue. I played about 20-30 games and one of them was bad with
lag. The
rest were fine. If I lost, it was me.
Dunno about the lag on the other games (GG or KOF).
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 8:10 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
when u lose online, in t7? do you feel like it was because of
lag?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Donaldson,
Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 05:52 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
So I was on the Skyrim reddit and there was an article about a
guy who boots up his brothers old copy of Skyrim just to look at
the last
thing he was doing before he died. https://imgur.com/a/Gh20l
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__imgur.com_a_Gh20l&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=6PucL_gEgr3CAE8LRb_6SKkYmM_3xBwc6Lq4sCpBi0Q&s=RNXlzdxbhJDVMQyBVI6Vr0lIum2rld9bMWakRmeN6Gc&e=>
Found a few other links in the comments:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/entertainment/a8374/
son-finds-his-fathers-ghost-waiting-for-him-in-vintage-rally
-video-game/
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.roadandtrack.com_car-2Dculture_entertainment_a8374_son-2Dfinds-2Dhis-2Dfathers-2Dghost-2Dwaiting-2Dfor-2Dhim-2Din-2Dvintage-2Drally-2Dvideo-2Dgame_&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=6PucL_gEgr3CAE8LRb_6SKkYmM_3xBwc6Lq4sCpBi0Q&s=XJhvbl1qZ-H1gq5Ln3oMoy58eLutex9d-iiINwRo50M&e=>
and
http://www.duelinganalogs.com/comic/a-tear-jerking-story-abo
ut-animal-crossing/
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.duelinganalogs.com_comic_a-2Dtear-2Djerking-2Dstory-2Dabout-2Danimal-2Dcrossing_&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=6PucL_gEgr3CAE8LRb_6SKkYmM_3xBwc6Lq4sCpBi0Q&s=E6Arb7K318-jgDo4xrV5vl9nkMWIWBL2ehPqex9TVcg&e=>
Sniff…Oh, the feels…
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 26 July 2017 4:03 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
wtf
lmao, das sounds great.
what time are people gna be there at EGE?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Nicholas
Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 July 2017 01:58 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Kum balls VS polony and mash
Paashaas VS LB cook-off lessgo!
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Wynand-Ben <
paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
with his balls?
on his balls?
over his balls?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Nicholas
Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 26, 2017 03:51 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
...off his balls
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Wynand-Ben <
paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You coming on Sat?
Kum want to bounce some Johnny off the walls
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 26, 2017 03:48 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
its not 1f combos
its bnbs that every johnny mus know
anyone can do them with 12 hours training.
johnny on defence is not good, luckily his offence is great so
I don't really have to worry about blocking if I can spam 6H
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Ilitirit Sama <
ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 July 2017 01:44 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
He is already like that. But it's not about the combos. It's
how "good" he is when recovers from dropped combos.
Button...button...motion...button *drops combo* MASH
MASH MASH MASH MASH MASH MASH MASH MASH (10 seconds later).
Block
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
LB is going to become like that SF4 play salie posted, where
guys are losing irl because they can do 1 frame combos online,
but not
offline.
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:01 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
that's what I said, you take your damage and then you get out.
that damage can range from combos to pokes. point is, you
don't stay.
last nyt u stayed. this was unconventional move.
I had to grab u
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Ryan Williams <
ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 July 2017 11:58 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
What's funny about you saying "take your damage and run" is
that I've beaten you with BC combos before. Explain to me how that
constitutes running?
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:43 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
baiken is not a gud character, nobody plays her.
she has to take any dmg she can get.
@sap, please play like you would normally. don't stay. take
your dmg and run.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Ilitirit Sama <
ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 July 2017 11:17 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
You can LB'ify any statement by just appending " like a bitch"
"You use those tatamis to run away like a bitch"
"You use those tatamis to rush me down like a bitch"
"You use those tatamis to hit-confirm like a bitch"
True story.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading
"Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail
and destroy
any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken
in
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions
or advice
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed
in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not
relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself
as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local
KPMG member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading
"Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail
and destroy
any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken
in
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions
or advice
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed
in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not
relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself
as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local
KPMG member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.
