whats the purpose of yozansen, you never do it anywhere else other than on my
wake up to get damage if I wake up blocking low?
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 27 July 2017 08:08 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Hello
On purpose. 2HS low profiles Johnny's supers. I ate way too many supers from
Khan before I figured that out. It's too hard for her to attack without a move
like that because Johnny's What's my name super beats Yozansen and just about
everything else besides jumping clean over it, which lets him get away for free.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:03 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
u did 2HS is invincible?
3 times I did treasure hunt on you and all the times it wiffed because of 2HS?
wtf?
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 27 July 2017 07:57 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
They were way too many. Myself and Khan played till after 3am. I recorded the
one where you IK'd me, but I didn't upload it yet.
That match is a good demonstration of one of the many issues with Baiken's
Azami. Toward the end I did raw Super with the intention of countering your
followup. I got Faultless Defense instead. They should do something those
inputs, and they should remove Azami out of guard as well. It's a major
liability.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:54 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
did you upload our matches?
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 27 July 2017 07:52 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
"Please don't try to trick me when we play fighting games"
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:41 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
nah online, andy was 2nd, offline he was sommer first wtf?
u tried to trick me
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 27 July 2017 07:37 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
Except that when I played you offline, I played exactly the same way I do
online? Then you took issue with it? I can't win in this argument *lol*
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:21 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
play style has everything to do with it.
if you play one way online and offline its something else, it has an effect.
I wasn't expecting it.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 27 July 2017 07:15 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
LB, I lose to you plenty online, and play style has nothing to do with it.
Changing things up every once in a while really shouldn't have that much of an
impact on the end result if you've got a good handle on how someone plays. I
lose to a lot of players online all the time. This isn't a new thing for me. My
point is that I beat you convincingly offline. Your view is that the better
player will win regardless of whether the matches are played online or offline.
Why, then, do I beat you offline? I'm still waiting for an answer to that
question.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:04 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
the online set was a close one, you should've won. I have emphasised that
before.
I told you, you lose online, coz you didn't play to your strength at the end.
you went in and stayed, which isn't usually what you do.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 27 July 2017 06:58 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
On Saturday, I'm just going to repeat what you said.
"Play to your strengths"
"Lag isn't a factor"
And you still dodged my question about why I beat you offline and not online.
Shouldn't the "better" player always win, according to your logic?
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:55 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Also you didn't play like you usually played online, that is also a big
contributor of me losing.
if you played like you usually play online then the results would've been
different.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 27 July 2017 06:51 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
Whatever you say LB.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:48 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
so tekken online is good, not great. that's about it.
the better players will usually win, same like offline.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 27 July 2017 06:44 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
Fortunately, I know that my screen is not at fault, because I test this shit
extensively. Most df+1s range from -1 to -5 on block. In some cases, df+1s can
become 0 on block which is usually range dependent (Master Raven's df+1
functions like this). When I test this offline, counter jab always wins in that
situation. There is no middle ground.
I was helping that new Eddy player on Discord with Tekken basics. I tried to
demonstrate to him how 1 can be used to force people to crouch because it is +1
on block and can't be interrupted by the opponent's jab. He was able to
interrupt me a few times because lag plays a factor. In an offline setting, he
wouldn't be able to interrupt with a jab in that situation at all.
Let's stop spewing bullshit and start looking at the facts please.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:38 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
so when the screen is at fault and you playing online , then you really in a
pickle?
amiryt?
online is good, my johnny is like top tier because of online. the results would
be the same online and offline. in kof and gg.
gg
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 27 July 2017 06:36 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
*lol* Don't give me that bullshit please. Df+1 is always beatable offline on
block. If it isn't, the screen is at fault. The frames don't lie.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:33 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
kof's online is hot or miss, but tekken is the best netcode.
df1 mixup isn't really an issue because it works offline too
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 27 July 2017 06:21 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
Ok, let me add something into the mix here. Why is it that you beat me online
in KOF, but when we play offline, I beat you?
You maintain that it's one and the same thing, but the results say otherwise.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:19 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
so you saying the results would've been the same if you played the same set of
games offline?
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 27 July 2017 06:16 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Hello
You asking me? No, the first time I played online was the first time I played
against anyone. I didn’t feel the connection was the issue. I played about
20-30 games and one of them was bad with lag. The rest were fine. If I lost, it
was me.
Dunno about the lag on the other games (GG or KOF).
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
Sent: 27 July 2017 8:10 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
when u lose online, in t7? do you feel like it was because of lag?
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 27 July 2017 05:52 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Hello
So I was on the Skyrim reddit and there was an article about a guy who boots up
his brothers old copy of Skyrim just to look at the last thing he was doing
before he died.
https://imgur.com/a/Gh20l<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__imgur.com_a_Gh20l&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=6PucL_gEgr3CAE8LRb_6SKkYmM_3xBwc6Lq4sCpBi0Q&s=RNXlzdxbhJDVMQyBVI6Vr0lIum2rld9bMWakRmeN6Gc&e=>
Found a few other links in the comments:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/entertainment/a8374/son-finds-his-fathers-ghost-waiting-for-him-in-vintage-rally-video-game/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.roadandtrack.com_car-2Dculture_entertainment_a8374_son-2Dfinds-2Dhis-2Dfathers-2Dghost-2Dwaiting-2Dfor-2Dhim-2Din-2Dvintage-2Drally-2Dvideo-2Dgame_&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=6PucL_gEgr3CAE8LRb_6SKkYmM_3xBwc6Lq4sCpBi0Q&s=XJhvbl1qZ-H1gq5Ln3oMoy58eLutex9d-iiINwRo50M&e=>
and
http://www.duelinganalogs.com/comic/a-tear-jerking-story-about-animal-crossing/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.duelinganalogs.com_comic_a-2Dtear-2Djerking-2Dstory-2Dabout-2Danimal-2Dcrossing_&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=6PucL_gEgr3CAE8LRb_6SKkYmM_3xBwc6Lq4sCpBi0Q&s=E6Arb7K318-jgDo4xrV5vl9nkMWIWBL2ehPqex9TVcg&e=>
Sniff…Oh, the feels…
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
Sent: 26 July 2017 4:03 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
wtf
lmao, das sounds great.
what time are people gna be there at EGE?
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 26 July 2017 01:58 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
Kum balls VS polony and mash
Paashaas VS LB cook-off lessgo!
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
with his balls?
on his balls?
over his balls?
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 03:51 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
...off his balls
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
You coming on Sat?
Kum want to bounce some Johnny off the walls
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 03:48 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
its not 1f combos
its bnbs that every johnny mus know
anyone can do them with 12 hours training.
johnny on defence is not good, luckily his offence is great so I don't really
have to worry about blocking if I can spam 6H
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 26 July 2017 01:44 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
He is already like that. But it's not about the combos. It's how "good" he is
when recovers from dropped combos.
Button...button...motion...button *drops combo* MASH MASH MASH MASH MASH MASH
MASH MASH MASH (10 seconds later). Block
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
LB is going to become like that SF4 play salie posted, where guys are losing
irl because they can do 1 frame combos online, but not offline.
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:01 PM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
that's what I said, you take your damage and then you get out.
that damage can range from combos to pokes. point is, you don't stay.
last nyt u stayed. this was unconventional move.
I had to grab u
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 26 July 2017 11:58 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
What's funny about you saying "take your damage and run" is that I've beaten
you with BC combos before. Explain to me how that constitutes running?
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:43 PM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
baiken is not a gud character, nobody plays her.
she has to take any dmg she can get.
@sap, please play like you would normally. don't stay. take your dmg and run.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 26 July 2017 11:17 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
You can LB'ify any statement by just appending " like a bitch"
"You use those tatamis to run away like a bitch"
"You use those tatamis to rush me down like a bitch"
"You use those tatamis to hit-confirm like a bitch"
True story.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
