LB, I lose to you plenty online, and play style has nothing to do with it.
Changing things up every once in a while really shouldn't have that much of
an impact on the end result if you've got a good handle on how someone
plays. I lose to a lot of players online all the time. This isn't a new
thing for me. My point is that I beat you convincingly offline. Your view
is that the better player will win regardless of whether the matches are
played online or offline. Why, then, do I beat you offline? I'm still
waiting for an answer to that question.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:04 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
the online set was a close one, you should've won. I have emphasised that
before.
I told you, you lose online, coz you didn't play to your strength at the
end.
you went in and stayed, which isn't usually what you do.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 06:58 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
On Saturday, I'm just going to repeat what you said.
"Play to your strengths"
"Lag isn't a factor"
And you still dodged my question about why I beat you offline and not
online. Shouldn't the "better" player *always* win, according to your
logic?
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:55 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Also you didn't play like you usually played online, that is also a big
contributor of me losing.
if you played like you usually play online then the results would've been
different.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 06:51 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Whatever you say LB.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:48 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
so tekken online is good, not great. that's about it.
the better players will usually win, same like offline.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 06:44 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Fortunately, I know that my screen is not at fault, because I test this
shit extensively. Most df+1s range from -1 to -5 on block. In some cases,
df+1s can become 0 on block which is usually range dependent (Master
Raven's df+1 functions like this). When I test this offline, counter jab
always wins in that situation. There is no middle ground.
I was helping that new Eddy player on Discord with Tekken basics. I
tried to demonstrate to him how 1 can be used to force people to crouch
because it is +1 on block and can't be interrupted by the opponent's jab.
He was able to interrupt me a few times because lag plays a factor. In an
offline setting, he wouldn't be able to interrupt with a jab in that
situation at all.
Let's stop spewing bullshit and start looking at the facts please.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:38 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
so when the screen is at fault and you playing online , then you really
in a pickle?
amiryt?
online is good, my johnny is like top tier because of online. the
results would be the same online and offline. in kof and gg.
gg
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 06:36 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
*lol* Don't give me that bullshit please. Df+1 is always beatable
offline on block. If it isn't, the screen is at fault. The frames don't
lie.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:33 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
kof's online is hot or miss, but tekken is the best netcode.
df1 mixup isn't really an issue because it works offline too
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 06:21 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Ok, let me add something into the mix here. Why is it that you beat me
online in KOF, but when we play offline, I beat you?
You maintain that it's one and the same thing, but the results say
otherwise.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:19 AM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
so you saying the results would've been the same if you played the
same set of games offline?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 06:16 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
You asking me? No, the first time I played online was the first time
I played against anyone. I didn’t feel the connection was the issue. I
played about 20-30 games and one of them was bad with lag. The rest were
fine. If I lost, it was me.
Dunno about the lag on the other games (GG or KOF).
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@freelis
ts.org] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 8:10 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
when u lose online, in t7? do you feel like it was because of lag?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 July 2017 05:52 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
So I was on the Skyrim reddit and there was an article about a guy
who boots up his brothers old copy of Skyrim just to look at the last
thing
he was doing before he died. https://imgur.com/a/Gh20l
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__imgur.com_a_Gh20l&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=6PucL_gEgr3CAE8LRb_6SKkYmM_3xBwc6Lq4sCpBi0Q&s=RNXlzdxbhJDVMQyBVI6Vr0lIum2rld9bMWakRmeN6Gc&e=>
Found a few other links in the comments:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/entertainment/a8374/
son-finds-his-fathers-ghost-waiting-for-him-in-vintage-rally
-video-game/
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.roadandtrack.com_car-2Dculture_entertainment_a8374_son-2Dfinds-2Dhis-2Dfathers-2Dghost-2Dwaiting-2Dfor-2Dhim-2Din-2Dvintage-2Drally-2Dvideo-2Dgame_&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=6PucL_gEgr3CAE8LRb_6SKkYmM_3xBwc6Lq4sCpBi0Q&s=XJhvbl1qZ-H1gq5Ln3oMoy58eLutex9d-iiINwRo50M&e=>
and
http://www.duelinganalogs.com/comic/a-tear-jerking-story-abo
ut-animal-crossing/
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.duelinganalogs.com_comic_a-2Dtear-2Djerking-2Dstory-2Dabout-2Danimal-2Dcrossing_&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=6PucL_gEgr3CAE8LRb_6SKkYmM_3xBwc6Lq4sCpBi0Q&s=E6Arb7K318-jgDo4xrV5vl9nkMWIWBL2ehPqex9TVcg&e=>
Sniff…Oh, the feels…
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@freelis
ts.org <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 26 July 2017 4:03 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
wtf
lmao, das sounds great.
what time are people gna be there at EGE?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 July 2017 01:58 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Kum balls VS polony and mash
Paashaas VS LB cook-off lessgo!
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
with his balls?
on his balls?
over his balls?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 26, 2017 03:51 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
...off his balls
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
You coming on Sat?
Kum want to bounce some Johnny off the walls
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 26, 2017 03:48 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
its not 1f combos
its bnbs that every johnny mus know
anyone can do them with 12 hours training.
johnny on defence is not good, luckily his offence is great so I
don't really have to worry about blocking if I can spam 6H
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 July 2017 01:44 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
He is already like that. But it's not about the combos. It's how
"good" he is when recovers from dropped combos.
Button...button...motion...button *drops combo* MASH
MASH MASH MASH MASH MASH MASH MASH MASH (10 seconds later). Block
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
LB is going to become like that SF4 play salie posted, where guys are
losing irl because they can do 1 frame combos online, but not offline.
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:01 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
that's what I said, you take your damage and then you get out.
that damage can range from combos to pokes. point is, you don't stay.
last nyt u stayed. this was unconventional move.
I had to grab u
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 July 2017 11:58 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
What's funny about you saying "take your damage and run" is that I've
beaten you with BC combos before. Explain to me how that constitutes
running?
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:43 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
baiken is not a gud character, nobody plays her.
she has to take any dmg she can get.
@sap, please play like you would normally. don't stay. take your dmg
and run.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 July 2017 11:17 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
You can LB'ify any statement by just appending " like a bitch"
"You use those tatamis to run away like a bitch"
"You use those tatamis to rush me down like a bitch"
"You use those tatamis to hit-confirm like a bitch"
True story.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
by AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
by AntiVirus software.
