GB is also playing Leo now, so I'm probably gonna drop her.
But the bigger problem is that online is so bad that I've lost interest in
the game because I only get to play it at sessions.
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Ashraf Barendse <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Sometimes I guess its just a design choice, like how Asuka has always only
gotten a single jab for -10 punishment and is also the only character who
is minus on block with her jab
On 5 Jul 2017 07:22, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hmm, Leo has a 16 frame low that knocks down and wallsplats.
Its essential a hellsweep that requires no execution.
I should have played this character ages ago
On 5 Jul 2017 07:22, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Yeah, actually considering your lack of follow-up/combo damage off the
knd, I don’t suppose it would make a big different.
Since I’ve been playing Paul for ages, I have no idea what it is like to
play with moves that are plus on block.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
*Sent:* 04 July 2017 4:41 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
I did figure it out :P
FC df+4 is the way to go. Its the best option he has... just wish it
was a little better for how badly it can get punished.
Dont think buffing it with KND is going to break the character.
He only gets reward is essentially the same.
Its better than just being at +5 but its still just a mixup, nothing
guarenteed... hence me not understanding it being such a big deal.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 4, 2017 04:17 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
Yoshi’s problems aren’t a quick fix issue. Go back to T6 days and read
the forums on him. He has always been one of the best characters not to
make the top tiers. He’s like the SA Cricket team. On paper, he’s awesome.
In practice, not so much.
Truth be told, upping his damage is probably the easiest way to fix this.
Take Lei in TTT2 – by upping his combo damage such that he was 10-20%
higher than most (or least Paul/AK) on staple combos was more than enough
to make him a competitive choice, rather than an amusing option.
Altering his low game would fundamentally change the character. Maybe
that’s what he needs, but then would he still be Yoshi? Not trying to take
the piss or be philosophical or any crap like that. What I’m saying is that
his playstyle is just not based on a low mix-up game. I dunno enough about
him to know what you should be spamming, but from what you say, it ain’t
lows. Or maybe it is, but you need to throw out the plus on block low, then
flash. I dunno, he’s your main, you figure it out.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
*Sent:* 04 July 2017 4:10 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
My issue is Yoshi is clearly not the best in the game tier wise.
But for some reason me Suggesting his low game could be better got
reacted to like I was asking to buff T6 Bob or something...
It also doesnt help that his damage is below average in most cases... I
could have gone with that instead.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 4, 2017 04:06 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
My understanding is that you’re upset that you don’t have a great 50/50
low mid mix at close range, is that right? Not all characters have this.
Your low doesn’t need to do much to make it useful. Bryan has no good
mid/low mix-up at close range. All he needs is db+3 or db+4. It’s enough.
Your low is plus on block. That’s a really scary thing to have to deal
with against a character where his mid option is killer. Sure it is
terrible on block. But if the mid option is scary enough, people will keep
eating it.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
*Sent:* 04 July 2017 4:00 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Both of us have noticed the difference before (in fact, you pointed it
out). You mentioned that when you attempt to cancel Dragonfly after twin
pistons is blocked, it results in a different float as opposed to just
letting yourself be comboed normally. If people have adjusted their combos
now to ensure that they always get max damage after blocking twin pistons,
more power to them.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Dunno about Raven but you cant really cancel the chopper stance after
twin pistons to stop being floated.
I know other folks I play float me properly for proper tailspin combos
when twin pistons are blocked.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 4, 2017 03:48 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
If viewed in a vacuum, maybe. If viewed alongside the possibility of
getting hit by twin pistons, which, if blocked, can be cancelled to ensure
that Yoshi gets floated for a shitty combo...
I mean, this is what goes through someone's head when Yoshi gets into FC.
a) He might do sword slash
b) He might do twin pistons
c) He might do FC df+4
Sword slash already has the 'deer in the headlights' effect which makes
it a very effective FC mindgame tool despite having stupid startup and a
noticeable tell.
Couple that with twin pistons and you already have a scary 50/50. Then
you factor in FC df+4 which, on hit, gives you mixup opportunities and
launches on CH.
I'm still ok with it being that punishable, considering how powerful that
mindgame is. But I get what you're saying.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Its not useless. Just not good.
Its all he has so hes forced to use it. Its useful in that sense.
Its just unfortunate. When one of a characters goto must use moves has
such a lobsided risk/reward ratio it ends up being luck based.
You can succesfully hit it 4-6 times but 1 block negates it all.
You have to do it so much that eventually they guess right and block it.
With the damage being way in their favour.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 4, 2017 03:24 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Same applies to FC df+4 in its current state (note, current state). It's
far from being a useless low. I don't want to be mixed up when I get
touched by that thing and I sure as hell don't want to be launched on CH.
Its effectiveness wouldn't be diminished in the slightest if it functioned
similarly to Master Raven's.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Its a reason to block low. With appropriate reward vs Risk imo.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 4, 2017 03:17 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
Demo man is a different move.
15f low. -31 on block.
Full demo is -17 on block regardless of JF blue sparkly ender or not.
Just the d+4,2 is -18 on block, -9 on hit.
Damage on demo is a mess and changes depending on range and the trip. Max
damage for it is 57.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
*Sent:* 04 July 2017 3:08 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Cool
So Demoman still works?
Change that to just giving you some plus instead. No followups etc.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 4, 2017 12:51 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
Dude, that would be out of control. For characters that have normal happy
launchers and stuff, the addition of a low which launches on CH is nice,
but almost always stupidly punishable.
Paul’s qcb+3 is 18f. It’s -9 on hit (but has mid follow up). Doesn’t trip
on hit. Launch on CH. On block, it is -21. No way is anyone failing to
punish that puppy.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
*Sent:* 04 July 2017 12:42 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
It still needs to be launch on block imo.
Just not with the stagger. It makes punishment automode. You can
realize late that you blocked something and still get the punish.
Make it approx -16 without the stagger animation and Ill be happy... or
give it KND.
So atleast people need to be awake to punish it.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 4, 2017 12:28 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
It's a low that not only gives you frame advantage on hit but can also
launch on CH. Seems fair that it has such a severe penalty IMO; especially
when considering that he already has an unblockable low that launches on
hit (which, despite having a very obvious tell, is still one of the most
effective moves in his arsenal). If he didn't have sword sweep as well, I'd
probably take issue with how punishable FC df+4 is.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Just feels like most -20+ full stagger animation lows seems to give you
a little more than +frames. He does get a combo on CH atleast.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 4, 2017 12:11 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
*lol* He's already amazing without that thing knocking down on normal
hit. Still leaves him at +5 on regular hit so he can do stuff afterwards.
He also has sword sweep so there's that :P
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
This yea
df+1, 2 follow is amazing and really helps allot
His new ws+2,1 launcher is boss yea its bad on block but you in chopper
stance so you just get floated. Still damage but not full combo damage.
His powercrush is super useful as well yea
FC df+4 just needs to KND on normal hit and he will be amazing imo.
Currently I need to take stupid risks with that thing for little reward.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 4, 2017 11:31 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
The mere addition of df+1, 2, twin pistons and his power crush, which
forces people to play neutral differently against him, is enough to elevate
him in the tier lists. His mixup game has become a lot stronger. This is
the strongest he's been since 5 imo.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You reckon it is enough to move Yoshi up the tier lists compared to
previous Tekkens? Then again, Yoshi has long been an excellent character on
paper, but not quite so much in actual matches.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
*Sent:* 04 July 2017 11:27 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Yoshi has definitely had some improvements in framedata...
But dunno about all the moves etc.
1,1 is way better
df+1+2,2 is only -13 and not launch anymore
His life drain dodge spin thingies recover faster from what I have heard
Having a normal df+2 is a definite improvement framewise
I assume UF+2 was a framedata buff that allows it to combo into flash...
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 4, 2017 11:18 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
Had a look at Paul’s frame data. Not seeing major changes in there
compared to previous games. One nerf that I can see, but it is small.
Anyone noticing major changes to frame data? I suppose that assumes that
you’re playing your old main…
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 04 July 2017 11:04 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
ye tekken would be hype
my king is ready
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 04 July 2017 09:00 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
At the very least, it would be nice to see Tekken featured at these
events.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
No Tekken
No Hype
Would say GG but im being realistic :P
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 4, 2017 10:49 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
y u guys not sad about EGE?
I did watch 40 min of omito beasting, need to watch the rest of the video
to understand the level
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of euraima tobias <euraima@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 04 July 2017 08:19 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
All good I missed it anyway, was selling for $489
On Tue, 04 Jul 2017 at 10:10 AM Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not the best, not the worst. Does the job.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 8:18 AM, euraima tobias <euraima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
@salie is the evga sc 2 1070 any good, build quality wise. Was preferably
looking for msi gaming cards but this one is available.
On Tue, 04 Jul 2017 at 8:04 AM lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
GB posted a picture on discord.
no CTS, no tekken, no gg, not even sfv.
Injustice2!!!!!!!!!!!!!! tournament
I understand not wanting cts involved, coz we do things our own way, but
dammit, not even sfv?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 04 July 2017 05:52 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Info lb?
On 4 Jul 2017 07:16, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Morning peeps,
gg EGE is gg
so sad
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 03 July 2017 05:02 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
I saw this version before...Cyclops and Wolverine seems to REALLY like
each other lolz
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
XXX-men?
Lol
I bet if I check the imdb for that, it will get a better score than the
upcoming X-men movie.
I am of course assuming a parody would have been made for it by now, I'm
just too scared to check at work 😱
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
You know, when the producer of an X-Men movie touts it as a "sexy
thriller", one comes to the realisation that the movie's delay is probably
for the best. I'm referring to the TBD Gambit movie btw.
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Dude, I freaked out after doing one of the flight thingies where you're
supposed to spray shit. You're suspended in mid-air and the only thing
going through your mind is "how the fuck do I get down?" *lmao*
When Paas switched over to The Lab, I enjoyed it a lot more.
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My gran freaked out with the thing.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
*Sent:* 03 July 2017 11:40 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
It feels like you're actually there. Like with that plank thing; you
*know* it's not real but your mind still convinces you that it's
dangerous to step on to the damn thing *lol* There were alarm bells going
off in my head after just looking down :P
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Nice, glad you enjoyed it.
VR ftw
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Monday, July 3, 2017 11:03 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
That's really good. How much power does that use? You should try
dropping the power limit and increasing the memory. Try also mining with
the new Ethminer (not Claymore).
Paas that VR stuff is legit. I'm looking into getting a set now. Just
have to figure out where to put it...
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:58 AM, euraima tobias <euraima@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Noooo, fck man I was looking all weekend.
I managed to get my old 970 to 20mhs for ether... I'm surprised as it
mines ether better than zec.
On Mon, 03 Jul 2017 at 10:45 AM Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
@Khan were you fortunate enough to snatch a card of Amazon this morning?
1070 mini for R6k in total (shipping + import duty). Sold out between
the time I clicked on Add to cart and Check out
1060 mini for R3.2. Same as above
1070 watercooled for R7.3k. Managed to buy the last one. I'll probably
just resell it here though.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
