I think he was, but not sure. Maybe it was just JDCR making him look good. He’s
got a lot of other cool tools, like his 14f not very electric or windy godfist.
His low game was non-existent though.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of Wynand-Ben
Sent: 04 July 2017 4:44 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Hello
Was AK considered good Tier wise?
Could be why he wasnt?
But fuck knows I cant remember much from our matches about the character...
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 04:18 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Hello
Do you remember AK’s db+4 sweep?
It’s just a straight low on normal hit. CH combo. Block terrible. In paper that
move should not have been used at all. Ask Di if he agrees with that.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben
Sent: 04 July 2017 4:13 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
You dont need good players.
You just do some math.
Yoshi player does FC df+4 x amount of times per game.
Everytime he is gambling with odds that are not in his favour at all.
You cannot make that consistent. It will be erratic and unstable performance.
You will get blown up more than you succeed.
But you cant do anything about it because thats the only tool Yoshi has for
this purpose.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 04:05 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
Question is, does he need to be? I think he's a powerful character regardless
of tier. I don't need to wait for a high-level player to make up my mind for me.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
He doesnt have an extensive repertoire in this case. (For other situations
perhaps)
He has FC df+2. Struggling to come up with something that can perform a
similar function.
Not saying Yoshi is bad lol, but hes not touted as being amazing either.
So clearly something is missing or lacking.
I think its his low game.
Dunno if you okes have a different idea of whats keeping him from top tier?
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 03:58 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
But those moves aren't meant to be spammed to begin with, Paasie. It lessens
their effectiveness. If people eventually latch on to you spamming a strong
move and counter it, that's what supposed to happen to ensure that both parties
improve while advancing the meta. If they just keep getting hit by it and you
keep landing it successfully, who's learning anything? The mindgame is often
far more important than the move actually landing/being used. If used
sparingly, anything can be effective. And Yoshi has such an extensive
repertoire of tools that it mostly becomes a non-issue.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Im not complaining about the unblockable but even when I previously played
yoshi in T6 and the deer in the headlights is not gonna last.
Its really not hard to react to. We gonna be playing this game for a long
time... its working very well now tho.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 03:48 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
If viewed in a vacuum, maybe. If viewed alongside the possibility of getting
hit by twin pistons, which, if blocked, can be cancelled to ensure that Yoshi
gets floated for a shitty combo...
I mean, this is what goes through someone's head when Yoshi gets into FC.
a) He might do sword slash
b) He might do twin pistons
c) He might do FC df+4
Sword slash already has the 'deer in the headlights' effect which makes it a
very effective FC mindgame tool despite having stupid startup and a noticeable
tell.
Couple that with twin pistons and you already have a scary 50/50. Then you
factor in FC df+4 which, on hit, gives you mixup opportunities and launches on
CH.
I'm still ok with it being that punishable, considering how powerful that
mindgame is. But I get what you're saying.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Its not useless. Just not good.
Its all he has so hes forced to use it. Its useful in that sense.
Its just unfortunate. When one of a characters goto must use moves has such a
lobsided risk/reward ratio it ends up being luck based.
You can succesfully hit it 4-6 times but 1 block negates it all.
You have to do it so much that eventually they guess right and block it. With
the damage being way in their favour.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 03:24 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
Same applies to FC df+4 in its current state (note, current state). It's far
from being a useless low. I don't want to be mixed up when I get touched by
that thing and I sure as hell don't want to be launched on CH. Its
effectiveness wouldn't be diminished in the slightest if it functioned
similarly to Master Raven's.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Its a reason to block low. With appropriate reward vs Risk imo.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 03:17 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Hello
Demo man is a different move.
15f low. -31 on block.
Full demo is -17 on block regardless of JF blue sparkly ender or not. Just the
d+4,2 is -18 on block, -9 on hit.
Damage on demo is a mess and changes depending on range and the trip. Max
damage for it is 57.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of Wynand-Ben
Sent: 04 July 2017 3:08 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
Cool
So Demoman still works?
Change that to just giving you some plus instead. No followups etc.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 12:51 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Hello
Dude, that would be out of control. For characters that have normal happy
launchers and stuff, the addition of a low which launches on CH is nice, but
almost always stupidly punishable.
Paul’s qcb+3 is 18f. It’s -9 on hit (but has mid follow up). Doesn’t trip on
hit. Launch on CH. On block, it is -21. No way is anyone failing to punish that
puppy.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben
Sent: 04 July 2017 12:42 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
It still needs to be launch on block imo.
Just not with the stagger. It makes punishment automode. You can realize late
that you blocked something and still get the punish.
Make it approx -16 without the stagger animation and Ill be happy... or give
it KND.
So atleast people need to be awake to punish it.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 12:28 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
It's a low that not only gives you frame advantage on hit but can also launch
on CH. Seems fair that it has such a severe penalty IMO; especially when
considering that he already has an unblockable low that launches on hit (which,
despite having a very obvious tell, is still one of the most effective moves in
his arsenal). If he didn't have sword sweep as well, I'd probably take issue
with how punishable FC df+4 is.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Just feels like most -20+ full stagger animation lows seems to give you a
little more than +frames. He does get a combo on CH atleast.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 12:11 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
*lol* He's already amazing without that thing knocking down on normal hit.
Still leaves him at +5 on regular hit so he can do stuff afterwards. He also
has sword sweep so there's that :P
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
This yea
df+1, 2 follow is amazing and really helps allot
His new ws+2,1 launcher is boss yea its bad on block but you in chopper stance
so you just get floated. Still damage but not full combo damage.
His powercrush is super useful as well yea
FC df+4 just needs to KND on normal hit and he will be amazing imo. Currently
I need to take stupid risks with that thing for little reward.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 11:31 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
The mere addition of df+1, 2, twin pistons and his power crush, which forces
people to play neutral differently against him, is enough to elevate him in the
tier lists. His mixup game has become a lot stronger. This is the strongest
he's been since 5 imo.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
You reckon it is enough to move Yoshi up the tier lists compared to previous
Tekkens? Then again, Yoshi has long been an excellent character on paper, but
not quite so much in actual matches.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of Wynand-Ben
Sent: 04 July 2017 11:27 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
Yoshi has definitely had some improvements in framedata...
But dunno about all the moves etc.
1,1 is way better
df+1+2,2 is only -13 and not launch anymore
His life drain dodge spin thingies recover faster from what I have heard
Having a normal df+2 is a definite improvement framewise
I assume UF+2 was a framedata buff that allows it to combo into flash...
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 11:18 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Hello
Had a look at Paul’s frame data. Not seeing major changes in there compared to
previous games. One nerf that I can see, but it is small.
Anyone noticing major changes to frame data? I suppose that assumes that you’re
playing your old main…
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
Sent: 04 July 2017 11:04 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
ye tekken would be hype
my king is ready
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 04 July 2017 09:00 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
At the very least, it would be nice to see Tekken featured at these events.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
No Tekken
No Hype
Would say GG but im being realistic :P
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 10:49 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
y u guys not sad about EGE?
I did watch 40 min of omito beasting, need to watch the rest of the video to
understand the level
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of euraima tobias <euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 04 July 2017 08:19 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
All good I missed it anyway, was selling for $489
On Tue, 04 Jul 2017 at 10:10 AM Ilitirit Sama
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Not the best, not the worst. Does the job.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 8:18 AM, euraima tobias
<euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
@salie is the evga sc 2 1070 any good, build quality wise. Was preferably
looking for msi gaming cards but this one is available.
On Tue, 04 Jul 2017 at 8:04 AM lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
GB posted a picture on discord.
no CTS, no tekken, no gg, not even sfv.
Injustice2!!!!!!!!!!!!!! tournament
I understand not wanting cts involved, coz we do things our own way, but
dammit, not even sfv?
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 04 July 2017 05:52 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
Info lb?
On 4 Jul 2017 07:16, "lindsey kiviets"
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Morning peeps,
gg EGE is gg
so sad
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 03 July 2017 05:02 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
I saw this version before...Cyclops and Wolverine seems to REALLY like each
other lolz
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
XXX-men?
Lol
I bet if I check the imdb for that, it will get a better score than the
upcoming X-men movie.
I am of course assuming a parody would have been made for it by now, I'm just
too scared to check at work 😱
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Ryan Williams
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
You know, when the producer of an X-Men movie touts it as a "sexy thriller",
one comes to the realisation that the movie's delay is probably for the best.
I'm referring to the TBD Gambit movie btw.
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Ryan Williams
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Dude, I freaked out after doing one of the flight thingies where you're
supposed to spray shit. You're suspended in mid-air and the only thing going
through your mind is "how the fuck do I get down?" *lmao*
When Paas switched over to The Lab, I enjoyed it a lot more.
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
My gran freaked out with the thing.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of Ryan Williams
Sent: 03 July 2017 11:40 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
It feels like you're actually there. Like with that plank thing; you know it's
not real but your mind still convinces you that it's dangerous to step on to
the damn thing *lol* There were alarm bells going off in my head after just
looking down :P
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Nice, glad you enjoyed it.
VR ftw
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Monday, July 3, 2017 11:03 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
That's really good. How much power does that use? You should try dropping the
power limit and increasing the memory. Try also mining with the new Ethminer
(not Claymore).
Paas that VR stuff is legit. I'm looking into getting a set now. Just have to
figure out where to put it...
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:58 AM, euraima tobias
<euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Noooo, fck man I was looking all weekend.
I managed to get my old 970 to 20mhs for ether... I'm surprised as it mines
ether better than zec.
On Mon, 03 Jul 2017 at 10:45 AM Ilitirit Sama
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
@Khan were you fortunate enough to snatch a card of Amazon this morning?
1070 mini for R6k in total (shipping + import duty). Sold out between the time
I clicked on Add to cart and Check out
1060 mini for R3.2. Same as above
1070 watercooled for R7.3k. Managed to buy the last one. I'll probably just
resell it here though.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
**********************************************************************
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
