LOL the face at the end! I see it now
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*LOL* You guys NEED to find this!
I still have Sleepaway Camp for those who want to see GB's movie debut.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
One day...
Think we saw it on cracked or something
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Monday, June 26, 2017 1:40:49 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
Wait… Paas – what’s that movie about the baseball players who die and
become androids to go to Koshien? We need to track that puppy down.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir
*Sent:* 26 June 2017 1:39 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
True
Lego Batman tries tho. It references this: http://www.imdb.com/titl
e/tt0089243/
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.imdb.com_title_tt0089243_&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=SeXAwQRtv0g8BrBCqLy2IiNpESyk8nt-pTTKZxYqKk0&s=kP9mpU0Hxp6YHOqiIo4irIdb184Stmzp-y3fFGVKWPQ&e=>
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How are we going to beat the Ron Moss film? That’s a tough ask.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir
*Sent:* 26 June 2017 1:05 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Fan4stick
bes movie
Who has seen Lego Batman?
I just got my glorious BD nao. EVO movie night?
...that reminds me, still gotta finish hard ticket to Hawaii.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"The uncut version is better than the cinema release."
I agree with this. Also with the Lex and "Martha" faux pas.
I liked Man of Steel for what it was. I also enjoyed the first two Dark
Knight films. Wasn't a fan of Suicide Squad. And Green Lantern... well, the
less said about that, the better.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I still don’t think Bats vs. Supes was that bad. The uncut version is
better than the cinema release. There was a number of stumbling points in
the film – Lex being one of them. MARTHA!!!! Being the other major one.
Overall I thought the film was okay though. I didn’t think that Civil War
was miles ahead of it like the critics seemed to.
DC has been having issues though. Man of Steel was alright. Not great,
but alright. The Dark Knight trilogy was cool. Third film was weakest of
the lot though. Suicide Squad was poor. Nice music though. Sadly there has
never been a Green Lantern live action film. Never.
Anyhoo, WW was a fun film. That helped a lot. Kept the feel of the
comics. Diana comes across as a proper person – reasonably developed
character.
Oh, one thing that pissed me off is the 3d non-Imax version. It’s a lot
darker than the other versions. I mean that literally. Why do they do that?
I know the process darkens the film, but if that’s the case, then just
ignore 3d, or do it properly from the start.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
*Sent:* 26 June 2017 12:44 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
As did I. It's a step in the right direction, considering all of the
negative backlash that usually accompanies DC film efforts.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I dunno if it was discussed before. I saw WW. I liked it.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
*Sent:* 26 June 2017 12:42 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
You're doing it wrong, LB. You should be skipping Toby. Well, to be fair,
the first two weren't that bad.
That said, the Garfield movies weren't that much of a step up either.
Still better than the 3rd Spiderman movie though.
On a somewhat related note, has anyone else seen Wonder Woman? Thoughts?
Has this topic come up on the mails before?
@LB, I watched the King Arthur movie — at home. Just couldn't get into
it. It's a Guy Ritchie movie with medieval characters that doesn't work as
a Guy Ritchie movie.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:31 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I saw the trailer and it wasn't Toby so I skipped the whole previous
reboot as well.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 June 2017 10:25 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
Interesting. I saw the trailer and it didn’t grab me. Figured I’d just
skip this one.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
*Sent:* 26 June 2017 12:23 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
*lol*
In other news, it would appear that the new Spiderman movie is a hit with
the critics: http://collider.com/spider-man-homecoming-reviews/#images
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__collider.com_spider-2Dman-2Dhomecoming-2Dreviews_-23images&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=bdkIlaUrMQP8brS9wQ3f7jw0iTWM_ckrRd-MiAaSU8c&s=0JlUA7rfFxJTNYZlp7u0wGHL5Wxq0gIjUPoCLHkoC90&e=>
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:14 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Lol, I've been implicated by LB.
On 26 Jun 2017, at 10:33 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I was lttp and the lumi showed me the way on ps3.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 June 2017 08:25 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Why would you only play the 2nd one...
Fuck it I dont want to know
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Monday, June 26, 2017 10:22 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
2 is da bes and I a hvent played any of the others!!!!
also before you buy old games, check if they are able to work on your
current OS. I couldn't buy Fallout3 coz it had a note saying later versions
of windows has issues with the game.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 June 2017 08:19 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
If you just re-playing them then I probably agree.
But if you havent played them before then dont skip 1.
Its the best one imo
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Monday, June 26, 2017 10:15 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
I doubt I'd be able to play through ME1 now, but I'd probably still give
ME2 a go.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Yea, ME1 looks horrible today.
There is HD texture mod that is an absolutely must install.
When Stu started playing it I was convinced there was something wrong.
Dug through settings to see if something was missing or broken... could
not beleive my that it used to look that bad lol
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Monday, June 26, 2017 08:49 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
Pretty sure that there is a mod nexus for ME1. It’s only got something
like 3 mods on it. One of them is to scale up the game. Get it. Looks much
better.
You don’t really need one for ME2.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 26 June 2017 8:42 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
tsek stu for not taking my paul bait!!!
I got ME1, damn yesterday, the game is quite old, it doesn't support
1920*1080 res lol.
Resi5, seems good this co op thing is gna work on my nerves tho, I can
see it now. I believe theres a co op option so the other player can play as
the lady and not a grabby fkn AI.
Walking dead s3 is good, and clover shmup is epilepsy inducing.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 June 2017 06:28 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
Let me know what you find. I’ll be messing around with Claudio at some
point soon as well.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
