http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/deadball-film-review-227785
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of Nicholas Robertson-Muir
Sent: 26 June 2017 1:44 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Hello
That sounds epic!
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
One day...
Think we saw it on cracked or something
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 1:40:49 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Hello
Wait… Paas – what’s that movie about the baseball players who die and become
androids to go to Koshien? We need to track that puppy down.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of Nicholas Robertson-Muir
Sent: 26 June 2017 1:39 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
True
Lego Batman tries tho. It references this:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089243/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.imdb.com_title_tt0089243_&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=SeXAwQRtv0g8BrBCqLy2IiNpESyk8nt-pTTKZxYqKk0&s=kP9mpU0Hxp6YHOqiIo4irIdb184Stmzp-y3fFGVKWPQ&e=>
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
How are we going to beat the Ron Moss film? That’s a tough ask.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of Nicholas Robertson-Muir
Sent: 26 June 2017 1:05 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
Fan4stick
bes movie
Who has seen Lego Batman?
I just got my glorious BD nao. EVO movie night?
...that reminds me, still gotta finish hard ticket to Hawaii.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Ryan Williams
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
"The uncut version is better than the cinema release."
I agree with this. Also with the Lex and "Martha" faux pas.
I liked Man of Steel for what it was. I also enjoyed the first two Dark Knight
films. Wasn't a fan of Suicide Squad. And Green Lantern... well, the less said
about that, the better.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I still don’t think Bats vs. Supes was that bad. The uncut version is better
than the cinema release. There was a number of stumbling points in the film –
Lex being one of them. MARTHA!!!! Being the other major one. Overall I thought
the film was okay though. I didn’t think that Civil War was miles ahead of it
like the critics seemed to.
DC has been having issues though. Man of Steel was alright. Not great, but
alright. The Dark Knight trilogy was cool. Third film was weakest of the lot
though. Suicide Squad was poor. Nice music though. Sadly there has never been a
Green Lantern live action film. Never.
Anyhoo, WW was a fun film. That helped a lot. Kept the feel of the comics.
Diana comes across as a proper person – reasonably developed character.
Oh, one thing that pissed me off is the 3d non-Imax version. It’s a lot darker
than the other versions. I mean that literally. Why do they do that? I know the
process darkens the film, but if that’s the case, then just ignore 3d, or do it
properly from the start.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of Ryan Williams
Sent: 26 June 2017 12:44 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
As did I. It's a step in the right direction, considering all of the negative
backlash that usually accompanies DC film efforts.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I dunno if it was discussed before. I saw WW. I liked it.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of Ryan Williams
Sent: 26 June 2017 12:42 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
You're doing it wrong, LB. You should be skipping Toby. Well, to be fair, the
first two weren't that bad.
That said, the Garfield movies weren't that much of a step up either. Still
better than the 3rd Spiderman movie though.
On a somewhat related note, has anyone else seen Wonder Woman? Thoughts? Has
this topic come up on the mails before?
@LB, I watched the King Arthur movie — at home. Just couldn't get into it. It's
a Guy Ritchie movie with medieval characters that doesn't work as a Guy Ritchie
movie.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:31 PM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I saw the trailer and it wasn't Toby so I skipped the whole previous reboot as
well.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 26 June 2017 10:25 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Hello
Interesting. I saw the trailer and it didn’t grab me. Figured I’d just skip
this one.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of Ryan Williams
Sent: 26 June 2017 12:23 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
*lol*
In other news, it would appear that the new Spiderman movie is a hit with the
critics:
http://collider.com/spider-man-homecoming-reviews/#images<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__collider.com_spider-2Dman-2Dhomecoming-2Dreviews_-23images&d=DwMFaQ&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=bdkIlaUrMQP8brS9wQ3f7jw0iTWM_ckrRd-MiAaSU8c&s=0JlUA7rfFxJTNYZlp7u0wGHL5Wxq0gIjUPoCLHkoC90&e=>
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:14 PM, sameegh jardine
<sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Lol, I've been implicated by LB.
On 26 Jun 2017, at 10:33 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I was lttp and the lumi showed me the way on ps3.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 26 June 2017 08:25 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
Why would you only play the 2nd one...
Fuck it I dont want to know
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 10:22 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
2 is da bes and I a hvent played any of the others!!!!
also before you buy old games, check if they are able to work on your current
OS. I couldn't buy Fallout3 coz it had a note saying later versions of windows
has issues with the game.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 26 June 2017 08:19 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
If you just re-playing them then I probably agree.
But if you havent played them before then dont skip 1.
Its the best one imo
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 10:15 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
I doubt I'd be able to play through ME1 now, but I'd probably still give ME2 a
go.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Yea, ME1 looks horrible today.
There is HD texture mod that is an absolutely must install.
When Stu started playing it I was convinced there was something wrong.
Dug through settings to see if something was missing or broken... could not
beleive my that it used to look that bad lol
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 08:49 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Hello
Pretty sure that there is a mod nexus for ME1. It’s only got something like 3
mods on it. One of them is to scale up the game. Get it. Looks much better.
You don’t really need one for ME2.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
Sent: 26 June 2017 8:42 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
tsek stu for not taking my paul bait!!!
I got ME1, damn yesterday, the game is quite old, it doesn't support 1920*1080
res lol.
Resi5, seems good this co op thing is gna work on my nerves tho, I can see it
now. I believe theres a co op option so the other player can play as the lady
and not a grabby fkn AI.
Walking dead s3 is good, and clover shmup is epilepsy inducing.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 26 June 2017 06:28 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Hello
Let me know what you find. I’ll be messing around with Claudio at some point
soon as well.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
**********************************************************************
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
