RE: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:09:53 +0000

Doing it as fast as you can cancels it before the fireball even appears :P

Ie wasted meter

From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:50:57 +0000




do eet, press 3 buttons after throwing da fireball. theres no timing involved 
just do it as fast as u can
 
From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:46:44 +0000









I’ll get around to that eventually. At the mo’ I just find it easier to just 
end a combo with d+D, then throw the HS fireball out
 and run in for pressure. Works great against everyone except Elphelt where I 
need very specific distance or the fireball just goes through her.
 


From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets

Sent: 27 January 2015 8:43 AM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail


 

why don't you yrc the HS fireball then run in for pressure?

 




From:
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:26:35 +0000

Does anyone else think of Grenadier when they see Elphelt pull out her gun?
 
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Nicholas Robertson-Muir

Sent: 27 January 2015 7:08 AM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
 
Only within range.

On 26 Jan 2015 16:53, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Elphelt unloads her with Rocksalt shotgun shells.



It is super effective




From: 
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:35:08 +0000

when we having the next ggxrd tournament?

 

Suggestion:

 

1 Dedicated ft2 winnerstayson console

 

ban hitboxes

 

ban elphelt as she is not in arcade yet

 



 




Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:16:21 +0200

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Would be awesome if we could use Jeeva's place again for EVO but we'll have to 
confirm with him. If he's there again on Saturday, l'll chat to him about it.


On a somewhat related note, l'm thinking of running sessions at Kamimodo on the 
21st and 28th of Feb. Yay or nay?

On 26 Jan 2015 12:41, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:



I wonder how this affects streams. Are they actually making money off the 
stream, or is the advertising that generates the cash. Also if people make 
donations
 to the stream, is that exempt from the ‘selling footage’ thing? If they don’t 
air the stream unless they meet a certain amount of donations, does that then 
qualify as selling?

 

Speaking of which, are we doing Jeevas place again for Evo?

 

Oh, and here is a picture of one of my cats, Tom.

 



 

 

From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of sameegh jardine

Sent: 26 January 2015 12:31 PM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

 

Ah okay, that's pretty interesting. So if you record a tournament of a 
particular game (KI as an example) you aren't allowed to sell the tournament 
footage at all? I wonder if that disclaimer
 is made explicit when one buys a video game not that I ever bother to read 
through any of it :P


 

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:







MS recently redid their policy around this.  They are pretty open and chill 
now.  You can monetize stuff through adds and all that but you arent allowed to 
sell the videos at all.



Only really odd requirement they have is that you are not allowed to use the 
games name in the video description...




Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:15:22 +0200

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


 

Not quite the same but on a similar note I recently read an article about 
Microsoft possibly enforcing additional controls over their games and not 
allowing third parties to directly generate
 income from them. I think guys were saying that it may become illegal for 
tournament organizers to generate income by streaming or using their games to 
do so unless they'd obtained permission from Microsoft itself. Personally I 
don't see it happening any time
 soon - if at all -  but who knows, laws around these sorts of things always 
seem fuzzy and the streaming industry is becoming pretty massive with ludicrous 
sums of prize money being thrown around so maybe?


 

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair 
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:







Gaming companies in Japan seem to be against it in general. That’s why they 
complain so much about youtube and fight to get any references to their games 
removed,
 including (sometimes positive) game reviews. They seem to believe that all 
references to the game that aren’t under their control are evil. It’s this 
rabid fear of youtube that lands them up accidentally shutting down their own 
channels for copyright infringement.

 

From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Di Lhong

Sent: 26 January 2015 11:45 AM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

 

T7 releasing in Jap arcade on Feb 18. Hopefully they will stream or post some 
vids.

 


I remember reading somewhere that Japs are against twitch and streaming gaming 
vids. Or is that only Nintendo?



 

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

I can relate.



On 26 Jan 2015 06:59, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


I don't want to go to wurk.

I want to escape with the kitties.




​



 

On 25 January 2015 at 23:09, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:




Because it's not them who uploaded it to youtube...




 

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:15 PM, richard moorcroft 
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The japanese has the best tech right?? So why does it always look so blokkie 
kaka quality??



On Jan 25, 2015 10:09 PM, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Potemkin is low tier, the player is top tier.

 


Yeah, Jap footage always looks sucky, even at higher res.


I know that videos taken from Nico Nico will look like that, because they limit 
the res.


Still doesn't explain why all their videos look like 240p.



 

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Would have been hot if it wasnt recorded with potato...

 


 


While on the subject I really wish the god damned japs could figure out how to 
capture shit at a proper bitrate/resolution...  the majority of their footage 
looks like ass.




From: 
ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx

Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:22:54 +0200

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


 

Sickest Potemkin ever

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2ztjD8rBzQ



 

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Dude is entertaining to watch.

 


I rather enjoyed his sci-fi science show 




From: 
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:06:42 +0000


 



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUVw6Pn6GTg&feature=youtu.be



this is too real , the future is now. 




Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 06:59:20 +0200

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Good morning.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VqoFuffwes



 

On 25 January 2015 at 03:19, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Not sure if anyone is interested. But GuildWars 2 is 75% off until Sun 25th.

 


GuildWars 2 also announced an expansion. The game is amazing so far and the 
expansion looks good! Goodbye Diablo 3.





 

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Ashraf Barendse <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:


So they are actually re-releasing both dmc and devil may cry 4  seperately for 
next gen consoles.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/12/15/dmc-definitive-edition-and-devil-may-cry-4-special-edition-coming-to-ps4-and-xbox-one


they couldve just made it together.





 

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 10:49 AM, richard moorcroft 
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Buy the 450 one,, better price,, DLC and full game




On Jan 24, 2015 10:47 AM, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Just looked at the PS3 vs PS4 comparison of Saints Row: Gat Out of Hell.

I'm not a graphical whore, so I was going to get the PS3 version, but oh my 
gawd.  The screen tear is so annoying.  I just wish I could cross play the 
stuff on PS3.

That bundle is looking pretty nice tho, but it would mean that I've bought the 
same game 3 times.

:/

R270 for Gat out of hell, or R450 for Saints row 4(and all DLC) and Gat outta 
Hell.

Decisions, decisions.

On 24 Jan 2015 08:22, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It will sell by the gazillions

On 23 Jan 2015 23:21, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf4G54xSgno

 


Wonder how well this game will do.



 

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, richard moorcroft 
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

OK I BLANE LB THEN , OK??



On Jan 23, 2015 10:15 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Blame LB.


 

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:12 PM, richard moorcroft 
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

No I didn't,, I thought Tokido was doing the killing



On Jan 23, 2015 10:05 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Erm... you do realise Tokido was the one getting comboed, right?


 

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:48 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



tokido is the sickest




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz-VKGVFaCo



18:20




Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:13:32 +0200

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


I don't feel the need for nerfs or buffs in GG yet.

I still want to explore stuff.

No opinion on Kamimodo myself.

Not yet anyways.







 







 







 











 





 





 











 









 







 







 







 





The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received
 this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received 
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any 
copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any
 action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may 
be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the 
terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. 
Opinions, conclusions
 and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to 
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.




This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity
 for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG 
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes 
itself as such. Information about the
 structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.



 








 





The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received
 this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received 
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any 
copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any
 action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may 
be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the 
terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. 
Opinions, conclusions
 and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to 
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.




This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity
 for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG 
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes 
itself as such. Information about the
 structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.














The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received
 this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received 
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any 
copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any
 action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may 
be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the 
terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. 
Opinions, conclusions
 and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to 
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.




This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity
 for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG 
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes 
itself as such. Information about the
 structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.




The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please 
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original 
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the 
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken 
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and 
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, 
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do 
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed 
by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. 



This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms 
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to 
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and 
separate entity and each describes itself as such.  Information about the 
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.

JPEG image

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2015