Only within range. On 26 Jan 2015 16:53, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Elphelt unloads her with Rocksalt shotgun shells. > > It is super effective > > ------------------------------ > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:35:08 +0000 > > when we having the next ggxrd tournament? > > Suggestion: > > 1 Dedicated ft2 winnerstayson console > > ban hitboxes > > ban elphelt as she is not in arcade yet > > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:16:21 +0200 > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Would be awesome if we could use Jeeva's place again for EVO but we'll > have to confirm with him. If he's there again on Saturday, l'll chat to him > about it. > > On a somewhat related note, l'm thinking of running sessions at Kamimodo > on the 21st and 28th of Feb. Yay or nay? > On 26 Jan 2015 12:41, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I wonder how this affects streams. Are they actually making money off > the stream, or is the advertising that generates the cash. Also if people > make donations to the stream, is that exempt from the ‘selling footage’ > thing? If they don’t air the stream unless they meet a certain amount of > donations, does that then qualify as selling? > > > > Speaking of which, are we doing Jeevas place again for Evo? > > > > Oh, and here is a picture of one of my cats, Tom. > > > > > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *sameegh jardine > *Sent:* 26 January 2015 12:31 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > Ah okay, that's pretty interesting. So if you record a tournament of a > particular game (KI as an example) you aren't allowed to sell the > tournament footage at all? I wonder if that disclaimer is made explicit > when one buys a video game not that I ever bother to read through any of it > :P > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > MS recently redid their policy around this. They are pretty open and > chill now. You can monetize stuff through adds and all that but you arent > allowed to sell the videos at all. > > Only really odd requirement they have is that you are not allowed to use > the games name in the video description... > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:15:22 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Not quite the same but on a similar note I recently read an article about > Microsoft possibly enforcing additional controls over their games and not > allowing third parties to directly generate income from them. I think guys > were saying that it may become illegal for tournament organizers to > generate income by streaming or using their games to do so unless they'd > obtained permission from Microsoft itself. Personally I don't see it > happening any time soon - if at all - but who knows, laws around these > sorts of things always seem fuzzy and the streaming industry is becoming > pretty massive with ludicrous sums of prize money being thrown around so > maybe? > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Gaming companies in Japan seem to be against it in general. That’s why > they complain so much about youtube and fight to get any references to > their games removed, including (sometimes positive) game reviews. They seem > to believe that all references to the game that aren’t under their control > are evil. It’s this rabid fear of youtube that lands them up accidentally > shutting down their own channels for copyright infringement. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong > *Sent:* 26 January 2015 11:45 AM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail > > T7 releasing in Jap arcade on Feb 18. Hopefully they will stream or post > some vids. > > I remember reading somewhere that Japs are against twitch and streaming > gaming vids. Or is that only Nintendo? > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir < > nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I can relate. > On 26 Jan 2015 06:59, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't want to go to wurk. > I want to escape with the kitties. > > > > On 25 January 2015 at 23:09, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Because it's not them who uploaded it to youtube... > > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:15 PM, richard moorcroft < > greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The japanese has the best tech right?? So why does it always look so > blokkie kaka quality?? > On Jan 25, 2015 10:09 PM, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Potemkin is low tier, the player is top tier. > > Yeah, Jap footage always looks sucky, even at higher res. > I know that videos taken from Nico Nico will look like that, because > they limit the res. > Still doesn't explain why all their videos look like 240p. > > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Would have been hot if it wasnt recorded with potato... > > > While on the subject I really wish the god damned japs could figure out > how to capture shit at a proper bitrate/resolution... the majority of > their footage looks like ass. > ------------------------------ > From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx > Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:22:54 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Sickest Potemkin ever > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2ztjD8rBzQ > > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Dude is entertaining to watch. > > I rather enjoyed his sci-fi science show > ------------------------------ > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:06:42 +0000 > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUVw6Pn6GTg&feature=youtu.be > > this is too real , the future is now. > ------------------------------ > Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 06:59:20 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Good morning. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VqoFuffwes > > On 25 January 2015 at 03:19, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Not sure if anyone is interested. But GuildWars 2 is 75% off until Sun > 25th. > > GuildWars 2 also announced an expansion. The game is amazing so far and > the expansion looks good! Goodbye Diablo 3. > > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Ashraf Barendse < > ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So they are actually re-releasing both dmc and devil may cry 4 > seperately for next gen consoles. > > http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/12/15/dmc-definitive-edition-and-devil-may-cry-4-special-edition-coming-to-ps4-and-xbox-one > they couldve just made it together. > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 10:49 AM, richard moorcroft < > greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Buy the 450 one,, better price,, DLC and full game > On Jan 24, 2015 10:47 AM, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Just looked at the PS3 vs PS4 comparison of Saints Row: Gat Out of Hell. > I'm not a graphical whore, so I was going to get the PS3 version, but oh > my gawd. The screen tear is so annoying. I just wish I could cross play > the stuff on PS3. > That bundle is looking pretty nice tho, but it would mean that I've bought > the same game 3 times. > :/ > R270 for Gat out of hell, or R450 for Saints row 4(and all DLC) and Gat > outta Hell. > Decisions, decisions. > On 24 Jan 2015 08:22, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > It will sell by the gazillions > On 23 Jan 2015 23:21, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf4G54xSgno > > Wonder how well this game will do. > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, richard moorcroft < > greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > OK I BLANE LB THEN , OK?? > On Jan 23, 2015 10:15 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Blame LB. > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:12 PM, richard moorcroft < > greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > No I didn't,, I thought Tokido was doing the killing > On Jan 23, 2015 10:05 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Erm... you do realise Tokido was the one getting comboed, right? > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:48 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > tokido is the sickest > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz-VKGVFaCo > > 18:20 > ------------------------------ > Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:13:32 +0200 > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I don't feel the need for nerfs or buffs in GG yet. > I still want to explore stuff. > No opinion on Kamimodo myself. > Not yet anyways. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > >