Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 22:18:28 +0200

They basically put Steve Tyler in One Piece.

​

On 26 January 2015 at 20:32, Ashraf Barendse <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Lol, I need new glasses.
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Two Millias, two Zatos.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Ashraf Barendse <
>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> aww yeah, lets go Faust.
>>>
>>> http://shoryuken.com/2015/01/24/frosty-faustings-vii-day-1-streaming-live-from-northbrook-illinois/
>>> I'm pleased to see that top 8 is all different characters.
>>>
>>> Also, Wolfkrone taking 1st in Ultra? I thought he retired.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is weird.
>>>> Pretty much the nerdiest rap song ever but it has legitimate hip hop
>>>> dudes.....and some other freaks.
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drJ9gUy8rIQ
>>>>
>>>> On 26 January 2015 at 18:20, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> *lol*
>>>>> On 26 Jan 2015 18:10, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The 28th is too far away. We need to assess who is dabes in xrd
>>>>>> again. The previous results were fraudulent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:53:08 +0000
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just got started on a new project today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ask about timeline for deliverable and stuff...  then I get informed
>>>>>> that its already behind schedule since it was suppose to have started 2
>>>>>> weeks ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fun times :P
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:50:32 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :(
>>>>>> On 26 Jan 2015 17:44, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sadly there is a chance I may be working late on Wed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:36:57 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do, or do not. There is no try! :P
>>>>>> On 26 Jan 2015 17:30, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ill try and attend this one
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:59:36 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> From: euraima@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes sure, let me know who's all keen?
>>>>>> On 26 Jan 2015 4:39 PM, "sameegh jardine" <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The struggle is real.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Speaking of which, offline session Wednesday? Khan?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:35 PM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> when we having the next ggxrd tournament?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Suggestion:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1 Dedicated ft2 winnerstayson console
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ban hitboxes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ban elphelt as she is not in arcade yet
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:16:21 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would be awesome if we could use Jeeva's place again for EVO but
>>>>>> we'll have to confirm with him. If he's there again on Saturday, l'll 
>>>>>> chat
>>>>>> to him about it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On a somewhat related note, l'm thinking of running sessions at
>>>>>> Kamimodo on the 21st and 28th of Feb. Yay or nay?
>>>>>> On 26 Jan 2015 12:41, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I wonder how this affects streams. Are they actually making money
>>>>>> off the stream, or is the advertising that generates the cash. Also if
>>>>>> people make donations to the stream, is that exempt from the ‘selling
>>>>>> footage’ thing? If they don’t air the stream unless they meet a certain
>>>>>> amount of donations, does that then qualify as selling?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Speaking of which, are we doing Jeevas place again for Evo?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, and here is a picture of one of my cats, Tom.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *sameegh jardine
>>>>>> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 12:31 PM
>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Ah okay, that's pretty interesting. So if you record a tournament of
>>>>>> a particular game (KI as an example) you aren't allowed to sell the
>>>>>> tournament footage at all? I wonder if that disclaimer is made explicit
>>>>>> when one buys a video game not that I ever bother to read through any of 
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> :P
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Wynand-Ben <
>>>>>> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  MS recently redid their policy around this.  They are pretty open
>>>>>> and chill now.  You can monetize stuff through adds and all that but you
>>>>>> arent allowed to sell the videos at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only really odd requirement they have is that you are not allowed to
>>>>>> use the games name in the video description...
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>  Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:15:22 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Not quite the same but on a similar note I recently read an
>>>>>> article about Microsoft possibly enforcing additional controls over their
>>>>>> games and not allowing third parties to directly generate income from 
>>>>>> them.
>>>>>> I think guys were saying that it may become illegal for tournament
>>>>>> organizers to generate income by streaming or using their games to do so
>>>>>> unless they'd obtained permission from Microsoft itself. Personally I 
>>>>>> don't
>>>>>> see it happening any time soon - if at all -  but who knows, laws around
>>>>>> these sorts of things always seem fuzzy and the streaming industry is
>>>>>> becoming pretty massive with ludicrous sums of prize money being thrown
>>>>>> around so maybe?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Gaming companies in Japan seem to be against it in general. That’s
>>>>>> why they complain so much about youtube and fight to get any references 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> their games removed, including (sometimes positive) game reviews. They 
>>>>>> seem
>>>>>> to believe that all references to the game that aren’t under their 
>>>>>> control
>>>>>> are evil. It’s this rabid fear of youtube that lands them up accidentally
>>>>>> shutting down their own channels for copyright infringement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>>>>> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 11:45 AM
>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  T7 releasing in Jap arcade on Feb 18. Hopefully they will stream or
>>>>>> post some vids.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I remember reading somewhere that Japs are against twitch and
>>>>>> streaming gaming vids. Or is that only Nintendo?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can relate.
>>>>>>   On 26 Jan 2015 06:59, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I don't want to go to wurk.
>>>>>>  I want to escape with the kitties.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ​
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On 25 January 2015 at 23:09, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Because it's not them who uploaded it to youtube...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:15 PM, richard moorcroft <
>>>>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The japanese has the best tech right?? So why does it always look so
>>>>>> blokkie kaka quality??
>>>>>>   On Jan 25, 2015 10:09 PM, "Ashraf Barendse" <
>>>>>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Potemkin is low tier, the player is top tier.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Yeah, Jap footage always looks sucky, even at higher res.
>>>>>>  I know that videos taken from Nico Nico will look like that,
>>>>>> because they limit the res.
>>>>>>  Still doesn't explain why all their videos look like 240p.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Would have been hot if it wasnt recorded with potato...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  While on the subject I really wish the god damned japs could figure
>>>>>> out how to capture shit at a proper bitrate/resolution...  the majority 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> their footage looks like ass.
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>  From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:22:54 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Sickest Potemkin ever
>>>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2ztjD8rBzQ
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Dude is entertaining to watch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I rather enjoyed his sci-fi science show
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>  From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:06:42 +0000
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUVw6Pn6GTg&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this is too real , the future is now.
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>  Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 06:59:20 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>  Good morning.
>>>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VqoFuffwes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On 25 January 2015 at 03:19, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Not sure if anyone is interested. But GuildWars 2 is 75% off until
>>>>>> Sun 25th.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  GuildWars 2 also announced an expansion. The game is amazing so far
>>>>>> and the expansion looks good! Goodbye Diablo 3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Ashraf Barendse <
>>>>>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  So they are actually re-releasing both dmc and devil may cry 4
>>>>>>  seperately for next gen consoles.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/12/15/dmc-definitive-edition-and-devil-may-cry-4-special-edition-coming-to-ps4-and-xbox-one
>>>>>>  they couldve just made it together.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 10:49 AM, richard moorcroft <
>>>>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Buy the 450 one,, better price,, DLC and full game
>>>>>>   On Jan 24, 2015 10:47 AM, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <
>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just looked at the PS3 vs PS4 comparison of Saints Row: Gat Out of
>>>>>> Hell.
>>>>>> I'm not a graphical whore, so I was going to get the PS3 version, but
>>>>>> oh my gawd.  The screen tear is so annoying.  I just wish I could cross
>>>>>> play the stuff on PS3.
>>>>>> That bundle is looking pretty nice tho, but it would mean that I've
>>>>>> bought the same game 3 times.
>>>>>> :/
>>>>>> R270 for Gat out of hell, or R450 for Saints row 4(and all DLC) and
>>>>>> Gat outta Hell.
>>>>>> Decisions, decisions.
>>>>>>  On 24 Jan 2015 08:22, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It will sell by the gazillions
>>>>>>  On 23 Jan 2015 23:21, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf4G54xSgno
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Wonder how well this game will do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, richard moorcroft <
>>>>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK I BLANE LB THEN , OK??
>>>>>>   On Jan 23, 2015 10:15 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Blame LB.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:12 PM, richard moorcroft <
>>>>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No I didn't,, I thought Tokido was doing the killing
>>>>>>   On Jan 23, 2015 10:05 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Erm... you do realise Tokido was the one getting comboed, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:48 PM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  tokido is the sickest
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz-VKGVFaCo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 18:20
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>  Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:13:32 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>  I don't feel the need for nerfs or buffs in GG yet.
>>>>>> I still want to explore stuff.
>>>>>> No opinion on Kamimodo myself.
>>>>>> Not yet anyways.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   ------------------------------
>>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other 
>>>>>> information
>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, 
>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing 
>>>>>> services
>>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>>> Information
>>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other 
>>>>>> information
>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, 
>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing 
>>>>>> services
>>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>>> Information
>>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

PNG image

JPEG image

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2015