Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:59:45 +0200

This is weird.
Pretty much the nerdiest rap song ever but it has legitimate hip hop
dudes.....and some other freaks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drJ9gUy8rIQ

On 26 January 2015 at 18:20, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> *lol*
> On 26 Jan 2015 18:10, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> The 28th is too far away. We need to assess who is dabes in xrd again.
>> The previous results were fraudulent.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:53:08 +0000
>>
>> Just got started on a new project today.
>>
>> Ask about timeline for deliverable and stuff...  then I get informed that
>> its already behind schedule since it was suppose to have started 2 weeks
>> ago.
>>
>> Fun times :P
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:50:32 +0200
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> :(
>> On 26 Jan 2015 17:44, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Indeed...
>>
>> Sadly there is a chance I may be working late on Wed.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:36:57 +0200
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Do, or do not. There is no try! :P
>> On 26 Jan 2015 17:30, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Ill try and attend this one
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:59:36 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: euraima@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Yes sure, let me know who's all keen?
>> On 26 Jan 2015 4:39 PM, "sameegh jardine" <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> The struggle is real.
>>
>> Speaking of which, offline session Wednesday? Khan?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:35 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> when we having the next ggxrd tournament?
>>
>> Suggestion:
>>
>> 1 Dedicated ft2 winnerstayson console
>>
>> ban hitboxes
>>
>> ban elphelt as she is not in arcade yet
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:16:21 +0200
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> Would be awesome if we could use Jeeva's place again for EVO but we'll
>> have to confirm with him. If he's there again on Saturday, l'll chat to him
>> about it.
>>
>> On a somewhat related note, l'm thinking of running sessions at Kamimodo
>> on the 21st and 28th of Feb. Yay or nay?
>> On 26 Jan 2015 12:41, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  I wonder how this affects streams. Are they actually making money off
>> the stream, or is the advertising that generates the cash. Also if people
>> make donations to the stream, is that exempt from the ‘selling footage’
>> thing? If they don’t air the stream unless they meet a certain amount of
>> donations, does that then qualify as selling?
>>
>> Speaking of which, are we doing Jeevas place again for Evo?
>>
>> Oh, and here is a picture of one of my cats, Tom.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *sameegh jardine
>> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 12:31 PM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>  Ah okay, that's pretty interesting. So if you record a tournament of a
>> particular game (KI as an example) you aren't allowed to sell the
>> tournament footage at all? I wonder if that disclaimer is made explicit
>> when one buys a video game not that I ever bother to read through any of it
>> :P
>>
>>  On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  MS recently redid their policy around this.  They are pretty open and
>> chill now.  You can monetize stuff through adds and all that but you arent
>> allowed to sell the videos at all.
>>
>> Only really odd requirement they have is that you are not allowed to use
>> the games name in the video description...
>>  ------------------------------
>>  Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:15:22 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>  Not quite the same but on a similar note I recently read an
>> article about Microsoft possibly enforcing additional controls over their
>> games and not allowing third parties to directly generate income from them.
>> I think guys were saying that it may become illegal for tournament
>> organizers to generate income by streaming or using their games to do so
>> unless they'd obtained permission from Microsoft itself. Personally I don't
>> see it happening any time soon - if at all -  but who knows, laws around
>> these sorts of things always seem fuzzy and the streaming industry is
>> becoming pretty massive with ludicrous sums of prize money being thrown
>> around so maybe?
>>
>>  On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Gaming companies in Japan seem to be against it in general. That’s why
>> they complain so much about youtube and fight to get any references to
>> their games removed, including (sometimes positive) game reviews. They seem
>> to believe that all references to the game that aren’t under their control
>> are evil. It’s this rabid fear of youtube that lands them up accidentally
>> shutting down their own channels for copyright infringement.
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 11:45 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>  T7 releasing in Jap arcade on Feb 18. Hopefully they will stream or post
>> some vids.
>>
>>  I remember reading somewhere that Japs are against twitch and streaming
>> gaming vids. Or is that only Nintendo?
>>
>>  On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I can relate.
>>   On 26 Jan 2015 06:59, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  I don't want to go to wurk.
>>  I want to escape with the kitties.
>>
>> ​
>>
>>  On 25 January 2015 at 23:09, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Because it's not them who uploaded it to youtube...
>>
>>  On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:15 PM, richard moorcroft <
>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> The japanese has the best tech right?? So why does it always look so
>> blokkie kaka quality??
>>   On Jan 25, 2015 10:09 PM, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Potemkin is low tier, the player is top tier.
>>
>>  Yeah, Jap footage always looks sucky, even at higher res.
>>  I know that videos taken from Nico Nico will look like that, because
>> they limit the res.
>>  Still doesn't explain why all their videos look like 240p.
>>
>>  On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Would have been hot if it wasnt recorded with potato...
>>
>>
>>  While on the subject I really wish the god damned japs could figure out
>> how to capture shit at a proper bitrate/resolution...  the majority of
>> their footage looks like ass.
>>  ------------------------------
>>  From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:22:54 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>  Sickest Potemkin ever
>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2ztjD8rBzQ
>>
>>  On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Dude is entertaining to watch.
>>
>>  I rather enjoyed his sci-fi science show
>>  ------------------------------
>>  From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:06:42 +0000
>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUVw6Pn6GTg&feature=youtu.be
>>
>> this is too real , the future is now.
>>  ------------------------------
>>  Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 06:59:20 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>  Good morning.
>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VqoFuffwes
>>
>>  On 25 January 2015 at 03:19, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Not sure if anyone is interested. But GuildWars 2 is 75% off until Sun
>> 25th.
>>
>>  GuildWars 2 also announced an expansion. The game is amazing so far and
>> the expansion looks good! Goodbye Diablo 3.
>>
>>  On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Ashraf Barendse <
>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  So they are actually re-releasing both dmc and devil may cry 4
>>  seperately for next gen consoles.
>>
>> http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/12/15/dmc-definitive-edition-and-devil-may-cry-4-special-edition-coming-to-ps4-and-xbox-one
>>  they couldve just made it together.
>>
>>  On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 10:49 AM, richard moorcroft <
>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Buy the 450 one,, better price,, DLC and full game
>>   On Jan 24, 2015 10:47 AM, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Just looked at the PS3 vs PS4 comparison of Saints Row: Gat Out of Hell.
>> I'm not a graphical whore, so I was going to get the PS3 version, but oh
>> my gawd.  The screen tear is so annoying.  I just wish I could cross play
>> the stuff on PS3.
>> That bundle is looking pretty nice tho, but it would mean that I've
>> bought the same game 3 times.
>> :/
>> R270 for Gat out of hell, or R450 for Saints row 4(and all DLC) and Gat
>> outta Hell.
>> Decisions, decisions.
>>  On 24 Jan 2015 08:22, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> It will sell by the gazillions
>>  On 23 Jan 2015 23:21, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf4G54xSgno
>>
>>  Wonder how well this game will do.
>>
>>  On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, richard moorcroft <
>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> OK I BLANE LB THEN , OK??
>>   On Jan 23, 2015 10:15 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Blame LB.
>>
>>  On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:12 PM, richard moorcroft <
>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> No I didn't,, I thought Tokido was doing the killing
>>   On Jan 23, 2015 10:05 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Erm... you do realise Tokido was the one getting comboed, right?
>>
>>  On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:48 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  tokido is the sickest
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz-VKGVFaCo
>>
>> 18:20
>>  ------------------------------
>>  Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:13:32 +0200
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>  I don't feel the need for nerfs or buffs in GG yet.
>> I still want to explore stuff.
>> No opinion on Kamimodo myself.
>> Not yet anyways.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   ------------------------------
>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>

JPEG image

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2015