RE: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:56:03 +0000

I dont mind where we do them.

As long as we are playing some GG ill be there

From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:54:34 +0200
Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

I'm all for Kamimodo.
Lots of space, so any grinding will be purely intentional.

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's in Obs, close to the McDonald's.
On 26 Jan 2015 14:48, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Where is Kamimodo again ?
Is it possible to move around there without grinding up on someone?
On 26 January 2015 at 14:33, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ah l see.
On 26 Jan 2015 14:30, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:








Yeah, need to check my area as well. The problem is that Eskom said that 
they’re changing the schedule so as not to screw over specific
 areas. They haven’t released the new schedule for Western Cape.
 
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ryan Williams

Sent: 26 January 2015 2:27 PM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
 
I'd like to shed a load on them. Hmmm, l better start checking schedules and 
shit.


On 26 Jan 2015 14:24, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Eskom just shed its load on us here at work




Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:06:09 +0200

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Majesty.


 

On 26 January 2015 at 12:40, Donaldson, Alasdair 
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



I wonder how this affects streams. Are they actually making money off the 
stream, or is the advertising that generates the cash. Also if people make 
donations to the stream,
 is that exempt from the ‘selling footage’ thing? If they don’t air the stream 
unless they meet a certain amount of donations, does that then qualify as 
selling?

 

Speaking of which, are we doing Jeevas place again for Evo?

 

Oh, and here is a picture of one of my cats, Tom.

 



 

 

From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of sameegh jardine

Sent: 26 January 2015 12:31 PM





To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail


 


 


Ah okay, that's pretty interesting. So if you record a tournament of a 
particular game (KI as an example) you aren't allowed to sell the tournament 
footage at all? I wonder if that disclaimer is made explicit when one buys a 
video game not that I ever bother
 to read through any of it :P



 


On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:




MS recently redid their policy around this.  They are pretty open and chill 
now.  You can monetize stuff through adds and all that but you arent allowed to 
sell the videos at all.



Only really odd requirement they have is that you are not allowed to use the 
games name in the video description...





Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:15:22 +0200

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



 


Not quite the same but on a similar note I recently read an article about 
Microsoft possibly enforcing additional controls over their games and not 
allowing third parties to directly generate income from them. I think guys were 
saying that it may become
 illegal for tournament organizers to generate income by streaming or using 
their games to do so unless they'd obtained permission from Microsoft itself. 
Personally I don't see it happening any time soon - if at all -  but who knows, 
laws around these sorts
 of things always seem fuzzy and the streaming industry is becoming pretty 
massive with ludicrous sums of prize money being thrown around so maybe?



 


On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair 
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:




Gaming companies in Japan seem to be against it in general. That’s why they 
complain so much about youtube and fight to get any references to their games 
removed,
 including (sometimes positive) game reviews. They seem to believe that all 
references to the game that aren’t under their control are evil. It’s this 
rabid fear of youtube that lands them up accidentally shutting down their own 
channels for copyright infringement.

 

From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Di Lhong

Sent: 26 January 2015 11:45 AM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

 

T7 releasing in Jap arcade on Feb 18. Hopefully they will stream or post some 
vids.

 


I remember reading somewhere that Japs are against twitch and streaming gaming 
vids. Or is that only Nintendo?



 

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:





I can relate.




On 26 Jan 2015 06:59, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:






I don't want to go to wurk.

I want to escape with the kitties.




​



 

On 25 January 2015 at 23:09, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:




Because it's not them who uploaded it to youtube...




 

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:15 PM, richard moorcroft 
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





The japanese has the best tech right?? So why does it always look so blokkie 
kaka quality??




On Jan 25, 2015 10:09 PM, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:






Potemkin is low tier, the player is top tier.

 


Yeah, Jap footage always looks sucky, even at higher res.


I know that videos taken from Nico Nico will look like that, because they limit 
the res.


Still doesn't explain why all their videos look like 240p.



 

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:







Would have been hot if it wasnt recorded with potato...

 


 


While on the subject I really wish the god damned japs could figure out how to 
capture shit at a proper bitrate/resolution...  the majority of their footage 
looks like ass.




From: 
ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx

Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:22:54 +0200

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


 

Sickest Potemkin ever

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2ztjD8rBzQ



 

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:







Dude is entertaining to watch.

 


I rather enjoyed his sci-fi science show 




From: 
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:06:42 +0000


 



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUVw6Pn6GTg&feature=youtu.be



this is too real , the future is now. 




Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 06:59:20 +0200

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Good morning.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VqoFuffwes



 

On 25 January 2015 at 03:19, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:






Not sure if anyone is interested. But GuildWars 2 is 75% off until Sun 25th.

 


GuildWars 2 also announced an expansion. The game is amazing so far and the 
expansion looks good! Goodbye Diablo 3.





 

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Ashraf Barendse <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:






So they are actually re-releasing both dmc and devil may cry 4  seperately for 
next gen consoles.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/12/15/dmc-definitive-edition-and-devil-may-cry-4-special-edition-coming-to-ps4-and-xbox-one


they couldve just made it together.





 

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 10:49 AM, richard moorcroft 
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





Buy the 450 one,, better price,, DLC and full game 




On Jan 24, 2015 10:47 AM, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





Just looked at the PS3 vs PS4 comparison of Saints Row: Gat Out of Hell.

I'm not a graphical whore, so I was going to get the PS3 version, but oh my 
gawd.  The screen tear is so annoying.  I just wish I could cross play the 
stuff on PS3.

That bundle is looking pretty nice tho, but it would mean that I've bought the 
same game 3 times.

:/

R270 for Gat out of hell, or R450 for Saints row 4(and all DLC) and Gat outta 
Hell.

Decisions, decisions.


On 24 Jan 2015 08:22, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





It will sell by the gazillions


On 23 Jan 2015 23:21, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:






https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf4G54xSgno

 


Wonder how well this game will do.



 

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, richard moorcroft 
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





OK I BLANE LB THEN , OK??




On Jan 23, 2015 10:15 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:






Blame LB.


 

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:12 PM, richard moorcroft 
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





No I didn't,, I thought Tokido was doing the killing




On Jan 23, 2015 10:05 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:






Erm... you do realise Tokido was the one getting comboed, right?


 

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:48 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:







tokido is the sickest 



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz-VKGVFaCo



18:20




Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:13:32 +0200

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


I don't feel the need for nerfs or buffs in GG yet.

I still want to explore stuff.

No opinion on Kamimodo myself.

Not yet anyways.








 







 







 











 





 





 











 









 







 







 







 





The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please 
address with the subject
 heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the 
e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in 
reliance on it, is prohibited
 and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are 
subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client 
engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail 
and any attachments that do not
 relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by 
it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.




This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity
 for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG 
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes 
itself as such. Information about the
 structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.




 









 










The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please 
address
 with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, 
then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the 
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken 
or omitted to be taken in reliance
 on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing 
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in 
this e-mail and any attachments
 that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor 
endorsed by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.




This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity
 for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG 
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes 
itself as such. Information about the
 structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.





 








The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please 
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original 
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the 
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken 
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and 
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, 
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do 
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed 
by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. 



This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms 
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to 
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and 
separate entity and each describes itself as such.  Information about the 
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.

JPEG image

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2015