Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Ashraf Barendse <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:55:05 +0200

Yep, just down the road from Barry's.

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Ashraf Barendse <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> I'm all for Kamimodo.
> Lots of space, so any grinding will be purely intentional.
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> It's in Obs, close to the McDonald's.
>> On 26 Jan 2015 14:48, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Where is Kamimodo again ?
>>>
>>> Is it possible to move around there without grinding up on someone?
>>>
>>> On 26 January 2015 at 14:33, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ah l see.
>>>> On 26 Jan 2015 14:30, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Yeah, need to check my area as well. The problem is that Eskom said
>>>>> that they’re changing the schedule so as not to screw over specific areas.
>>>>> They haven’t released the new schedule for Western Cape.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>>>>> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 2:27 PM
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to shed a load on them. Hmmm, l better start checking
>>>>> schedules and shit.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26 Jan 2015 14:24, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Eskom just shed its load on us here at work
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:06:09 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> Majesty.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26 January 2015 at 12:40, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  I wonder how this affects streams. Are they actually making money
>>>>> off the stream, or is the advertising that generates the cash. Also if
>>>>> people make donations to the stream, is that exempt from the ‘selling
>>>>> footage’ thing? If they don’t air the stream unless they meet a certain
>>>>> amount of donations, does that then qualify as selling?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Speaking of which, are we doing Jeevas place again for Evo?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, and here is a picture of one of my cats, Tom.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *sameegh jardine
>>>>> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 12:31 PM
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah okay, that's pretty interesting. So if you record a tournament of a
>>>>> particular game (KI as an example) you aren't allowed to sell the
>>>>> tournament footage at all? I wonder if that disclaimer is made explicit
>>>>> when one buys a video game not that I ever bother to read through any of 
>>>>> it
>>>>> :P
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  MS recently redid their policy around this.  They are pretty open
>>>>> and chill now.  You can monetize stuff through adds and all that but you
>>>>> arent allowed to sell the videos at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> Only really odd requirement they have is that you are not allowed to
>>>>> use the games name in the video description...
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:15:22 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Not quite the same but on a similar note I recently read an
>>>>> article about Microsoft possibly enforcing additional controls over their
>>>>> games and not allowing third parties to directly generate income from 
>>>>> them.
>>>>> I think guys were saying that it may become illegal for tournament
>>>>> organizers to generate income by streaming or using their games to do so
>>>>> unless they'd obtained permission from Microsoft itself. Personally I 
>>>>> don't
>>>>> see it happening any time soon - if at all -  but who knows, laws around
>>>>> these sorts of things always seem fuzzy and the streaming industry is
>>>>> becoming pretty massive with ludicrous sums of prize money being thrown
>>>>> around so maybe?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Gaming companies in Japan seem to be against it in general. That’s
>>>>> why they complain so much about youtube and fight to get any references to
>>>>> their games removed, including (sometimes positive) game reviews. They 
>>>>> seem
>>>>> to believe that all references to the game that aren’t under their control
>>>>> are evil. It’s this rabid fear of youtube that lands them up accidentally
>>>>> shutting down their own channels for copyright infringement.
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>>>> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 11:45 AM
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> T7 releasing in Jap arcade on Feb 18. Hopefully they will stream or
>>>>> post some vids.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I remember reading somewhere that Japs are against twitch and
>>>>> streaming gaming vids. Or is that only Nintendo?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  I can relate.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26 Jan 2015 06:59, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   I don't want to go to wurk.
>>>>>
>>>>> I want to escape with the kitties.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ​
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 25 January 2015 at 23:09, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Because it's not them who uploaded it to youtube...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:15 PM, richard moorcroft <
>>>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  The japanese has the best tech right?? So why does it always look so
>>>>> blokkie kaka quality??
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 25, 2015 10:09 PM, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Potemkin is low tier, the player is top tier.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, Jap footage always looks sucky, even at higher res.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know that videos taken from Nico Nico will look like that, because
>>>>> they limit the res.
>>>>>
>>>>> Still doesn't explain why all their videos look like 240p.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Would have been hot if it wasnt recorded with potato...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> While on the subject I really wish the god damned japs could figure
>>>>> out how to capture shit at a proper bitrate/resolution...  the majority of
>>>>> their footage looks like ass.
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:22:54 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sickest Potemkin ever
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2ztjD8rBzQ
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Dude is entertaining to watch.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I rather enjoyed his sci-fi science show
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:06:42 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUVw6Pn6GTg&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>
>>>>> this is too real , the future is now.
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 06:59:20 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> Good morning.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VqoFuffwes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 25 January 2015 at 03:19, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Not sure if anyone is interested. But GuildWars 2 is 75% off until
>>>>> Sun 25th.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> GuildWars 2 also announced an expansion. The game is amazing so far
>>>>> and the expansion looks good! Goodbye Diablo 3.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Ashraf Barendse <
>>>>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   So they are actually re-releasing both dmc and devil may cry 4
>>>>>  seperately for next gen consoles.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/12/15/dmc-definitive-edition-and-devil-may-cry-4-special-edition-coming-to-ps4-and-xbox-one
>>>>>
>>>>> they couldve just made it together.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 10:49 AM, richard moorcroft <
>>>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Buy the 450 one,, better price,, DLC and full game
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 24, 2015 10:47 AM, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Just looked at the PS3 vs PS4 comparison of Saints Row: Gat Out of
>>>>> Hell.
>>>>> I'm not a graphical whore, so I was going to get the PS3 version, but
>>>>> oh my gawd.  The screen tear is so annoying.  I just wish I could cross
>>>>> play the stuff on PS3.
>>>>> That bundle is looking pretty nice tho, but it would mean that I've
>>>>> bought the same game 3 times.
>>>>> :/
>>>>> R270 for Gat out of hell, or R450 for Saints row 4(and all DLC) and
>>>>> Gat outta Hell.
>>>>> Decisions, decisions.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 24 Jan 2015 08:22, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  It will sell by the gazillions
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23 Jan 2015 23:21, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf4G54xSgno
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Wonder how well this game will do.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, richard moorcroft <
>>>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  OK I BLANE LB THEN , OK??
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 23, 2015 10:15 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Blame LB.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:12 PM, richard moorcroft <
>>>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  No I didn't,, I thought Tokido was doing the killing
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 23, 2015 10:05 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Erm... you do realise Tokido was the one getting comboed, right?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:48 PM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   tokido is the sickest
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz-VKGVFaCo
>>>>>
>>>>> 18:20
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:13:32 +0200
>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't feel the need for nerfs or buffs in GG yet.
>>>>> I still want to explore stuff.
>>>>> No opinion on Kamimodo myself.
>>>>> Not yet anyways.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

JPEG image

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2015