Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 00:05:03 +0200

it's more like 2~1 than doing 2,1 to punish...

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Well that sucks *lol* NRS pls :/
On 12 May 2015 23:58, "Di Lhong" <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

21 is weird...it sometimes doesn't register 2 and then normal 1 comes out
-_-

i punish with d'vorah 212 easily but mileena's one...sometimes it doesn't
want to work...

guess that's what you get for having a 7frame roll lolz

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

*lol* l know her 2 is faster. Isn't it like 9 frames? But l don't know
if the string followup is worthwhile. Don't know Mileena's strings all that
well.
On 12 May 2015 23:50, "Di Lhong" <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Lolz zoning with poison mist...this isn't street fighter...yet...

Seems like Kenshi has similar issue like Mileena. All their specials
are punishable as hell...maybe we need to learn to option select.

I wish they just buff mileena's jab speed a bit...13frames is
horrible...nerf the dmg for all i care lolz

also fix d+1 hitbox...if wiffs completely against some character when
they block (because they lift up their arms...) -_______-"

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

I miss the old Poison Mist. You could zone with it in T5 *lol* They
nerfed it to hell in DR :(
On 12 May 2015 23:40, "Di Lhong" <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

T5 yoshi was simple and solid :)

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
wrote:

I would have been happier if he played like his T5 version *lol*
On 12 May 2015 23:35, "Di Lhong" <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EW4RaTNT8U

So Calamitsu is pretty much his TTT2 version. With a few moves
added to do S!

No big changes. Probably because there wasn't Soul Calibur 6...

He got his T5 df+2 back...which is damn good.

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

b12~d+throw

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:27 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

b12

------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 23:18:08 +0200

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
From: marongdin@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

What are you having troubles with D'vorah?

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:09 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

meh dvorah is too much work , that kuk is too tight.

back to funkjin it is

------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 18:55:52 +0200
Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
From: marongdin@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


lolz

Are you allowed to change character every match or something? I
remember someone mentioning they have a "unique" character selection
rule
for each match

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Ryan Williams <
ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

And then LB plays Draeka and gets bodied. #Kukgame
On 12 May 2015 18:44, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

i skipped abit to then end.

wtf i couldnt watch anymore draeka and jax plyaer were kuk. i
dunno how you lost to either of them, stu u so kuk.

------------------------------
From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 16:42:53 +0000

What, I’m on video? My mom must be so proud.


*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
*Sent:* 12 May 2015 5:23 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail

Yo Stu! We E-Sports now *lmao*
Nice vid Jag. Now can someone please go body Draeka and wipe that
cocky smile off his face *lol*
On 12 May 2015 17:16, "Moshe Shevel" <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Nice video of the JHB tournament
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=share&v=VKhwziCsOvE

------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies
of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained
in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.

KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as
such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG
member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.

This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.









Other related posts: