RE: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:40:03 +0000

If the reason for this is to seed for CTS, then we don't need to go psycho,
just have some ranked matches beforehand.

Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Stephen Scheidel<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: ‎2015-‎04-‎09 16:36
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

If tourneys with points are gonna be used maybe we can have more points and
seed the top 5 of the day/tournament.
More Seeded players will mean a more evenly spread bracket
My idea with that was just to have an easy way to separate regular players in
the brackets for CTS'S, not really as cool and rewarding as proper ranbats.
It's easy too because nothing different needs to happen at sessions as we'll be
able to go back to the challonge's whenever.

On 9 April 2015 at 16:25, Ilitirit Sama
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Beat Daigo you say? Godlike you say?

PIE|Smug (Dudley) — ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 0
MCZ|Daigo (Evil Ryu) — ● ● ● ● ● 5

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Sean Carrington
<theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
@Salie did you see my tech to beat Daigo ? I'm Godlike bro !

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Sean Carrington
<theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Is the Retail copy available in SA already ?

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Ryan Williams
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Nerf Shang Tsu... oh wait :D

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Nerf Kabal.

On 9 Apr 2015 12:46, "Ryan Williams"
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
NRS plsh.

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Ilitirit Sama
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Why are there already balance changes for MKX? They really should let the game
breathe this time around.

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.

KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.

This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.

Other related posts: