RE: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 19:13:34 +0000

Are you serious? Did you really have nothing else to do with your time, so were 
reading the terms and conditions?

MK9’s net code was okay. Played some games online and they were pretty good, 
even with foreign players. Found loads of players rage quitting though.

From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Nicholas Robertson-Muir
Sent: 12 March 2015 9:04 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

Read something interesting on PSN under the purchase information.
Network features require PSN+


On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Di Lhong 
<geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Yep.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Ilitirit Sama 
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Is Kano in?


On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Di Lhong 
<geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Nightwolf is in the game. I won't spoil much more than that.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Wynand-Ben 
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Needs some demonic motherfucking Nightwolf in there somewhere...
________________________________
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:35:11 +0200
Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx>
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

speculation is demonic Jax.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir 
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Haha
Johnny is such an a-hole
Who the hell was he fighting in the netherrealm??!?
On 12 Mar 2015 15:17, "Di Lhong" 
<geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
YES! @1.01 (Even though she's getting beaten up...at least she's in the game!)

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=916544685043596

Sonya looks cool.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Ilitirit Sama 
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
GG has other styles of safe-jump attacks using cross-ups.  Against some chars 
you can do a x-up from an airdash and it will beat/avoid reversals because of 
how the hit and hurtboxes interact.  Ino's VCL is good for this.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Wynand-Ben 
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Indeed 6P is normally a characters anti-air normal.  Usually with upper body 
invul etc.

Except if you are Elphelt.  Then its a overhead with no Invul.
________________________________
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:20:02 +0000

6P from sol is that gut punch that wall bounds.

________________________________
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:16:59 +0200
Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

That trishila start-up is bad news, but yeah, I was thinking of using that as 
an attack to counter your neutral jump-in after I'm floored.
I'll be honest, when I tried to get backdash from floor recovery, I didn't get 
it once.  I'll try more matches, but when you did your Sol neatral jump, I got 
owned trying it.

..and forgive my ignorance, but what is this 6P everyone keeps on chatting 
about?

Lumi pls.
On 12 Mar 2015 13:25, "Manase Zote" 
<bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
6P, is has a 11 frame start up and it loses to all safe jump ins meaty 
attacks/projectiles so it will get him killed on wake up.
6P/F+P is more of an anti-air and counter poke.

Trishila,
Invincible above the knees frames 1-39. 80% forced prorate and it's 25 frame 
start up, -6 on block doesn't help his cause.
I'm not sure if it avoids meaty attacks, needs testing.
I still maintain that his best option is backdash into pot-buster.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir 
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:












**********************************************************************
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please 
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original 
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the 
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken 
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and 
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, 
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do 
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed 
by it.

KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. 

This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms 
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to 
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and 
separate entity and each describes itself as such.  Information about the 
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.

This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 03-2015