Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 19:21:46 +0200

Yep.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Is Kano in?
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Nightwolf is in the game. I won't spoil much more than that.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Needs some demonic motherfucking Nightwolf in there somewhere...
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:35:11 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>> speculation is demonic Jax.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Haha
>>> Johnny is such an a-hole
>>> Who the hell was he fighting in the netherrealm??!?
>>> On 12 Mar 2015 15:17, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> YES! @1.01 (Even though she's getting beaten up...at least she's in the
>>> game!)
>>>
>>> https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=916544685043596
>>>
>>> Sonya looks cool.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> GG has other styles of safe-jump attacks using cross-ups.  Against some
>>> chars you can do a x-up from an airdash and it will beat/avoid reversals
>>> because of how the hit and hurtboxes interact.  Ino's VCL is good for this.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Indeed 6P is normally a characters anti-air normal.  Usually with upper
>>> body invul etc.
>>>
>>> Except if you are Elphelt.  Then its a overhead with no Invul.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:20:02 +0000
>>>
>>>
>>> 6P from sol is that gut punch that wall bounds.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:16:59 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> That trishila start-up is bad news, but yeah, I was thinking of using
>>> that as an attack to counter your neutral jump-in after I'm floored.
>>> I'll be honest, when I tried to get backdash from floor recovery, I
>>> didn't get it once.  I'll try more matches, but when you did your Sol
>>> neatral jump, I got owned trying it.
>>>
>>> ..and forgive my ignorance, but what is this 6P everyone keeps on
>>> chatting about?
>>>
>>> Lumi pls.
>>> On 12 Mar 2015 13:25, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> 6P, is has a 11 frame start up and it loses to all safe jump ins meaty
>>> attacks/projectiles so it will get him killed on wake up.
>>> 6P/F+P is more of an anti-air and counter poke.
>>>
>>> Trishila,
>>> Invincible above the knees frames 1-39. 80% forced prorate and it's 25
>>> frame start up, -6 on block doesn't help his cause.
>>> I'm not sure if it avoids meaty attacks, needs testing.
>>> I still maintain that his best option is backdash into pot-buster.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> F+P
>>> Situational.
>>>
>>> Trishila (that fire-pillar)
>>> Mega fist backwards.
>>> On 12 Mar 2015 12:24, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Like I said backdash is one of your best options on wake up and
>>> reversals are very tight for every character.
>>> Let's see what he has for wake up.
>>> Meter-less reversals,
>>> Backdash, Hammer fall(or it's cancel), wake up throw(not command grab).
>>> With meter,
>>> Both supers, reversal blitz shield(?)
>>>
>>> Is there anything else he can do?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sure, but if you throw in an attack that has active frames on my
>>> wake-up, it's going to be really tight.
>>> ...
>>> ...
>>> did I just use "frames" in a discussion?
>>>
>>> I'd prefer an option that gives me an attack that occurs as soon as I am
>>> able to move again.
>>> I mean, a reversal attack or the such.
>>> There are many options.
>>> On 12 Mar 2015 10:51, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> One of your best wake up tools is backdash.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> I thought about that yesterday, I plan to try something else for
>>> wakeup... soon.
>>> On 12 Mar 2015 10:35, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> makes sense.
>>>
>>> its a really bad matchup for pot. I no can just dance around his metal
>>> body on wake up for free.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:30:43 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> I thought about last night but it won't really work because flick
>>> nullifies the note and any pressure afterward [HCL gets absorbed].
>>>
>>> Pot's weakness is that he is free on wakeup imo, I just need to rush him
>>> down and try and score some damage when I bait the wakeup supers instead of
>>> getting thrown, lol.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:17 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> lol in theory it should work.
>>>
>>> all lumi has to do is use yrc note the f!@$!@ outa pot he cant do
>>> anything except block.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:11:40 +0200
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>> Ya, I must substitute my low tier with a slightly higher low tier.
>>> On 12 Mar 2015 10:00, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> I thought axl was supposed to be low tier as well.
>>>
>>> Sent from my Windows Phone
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Sent: ‎2015-‎03-‎12 09:56
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>
>>> He doesn't feel low tier.
>>>
>>> On 12 Mar 2015 08:01, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> ya lol, dudes dgaf.
>>>
>>> cameraman kept rolling he dgaf either.
>>>
>>> Potemkin is low tier bruh, u need to get in dat axel tech
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> > Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 05:54:19 +0000
>>> >
>>> > Did anyone else see the SABC guys getting mugged live in TV? Fun times.
>>> >
>>> > Sent from my Windows Phone
>>> > ________________________________
>>> > From: lindsey kiviets<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>> > Sent: ‎2015-‎03-‎12 07:43
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>> > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> >
>>> > morning peeps,
>>> >
>>> > GB r having a timeout from gaming, he concentrating on dat thesis.
>>> >
>>> > that auusie sk8r is top, he grinds a pipe and then does a flip off the
>>> pipe, 2 hit combo ftw
>>> >
>>> > ________________________________
>>> > Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 07:03:23 +0200
>>> > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> >
>>> > GB returns.
>>> > [cid:ii_i75ouyxm0_14c0c5d7affb6346]
>>> > ​
>>> >
>>> > On 11 March 2015 at 18:10, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>>> > One of the sickest skaters right now is an Aussie.
>>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1sjuey25ug
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 11 March 2015 at 18:07, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>>> > Di likes them feral :P
>>> >
>>> > On 11 March 2015 at 17:06, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>>> > Loving the feral look they gave her:
>>> >
>>> https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/11046867_787964651301709_1373710168499875823_n.jpg?oh=f5c40b0ddb9f0be2fdaeca4b41a3d387&oe=55730CAF&__gda__=1434191895_0b41784d84974df4d300335979aaea87
>>> >
>>> > Duke Nukem + Mel Gibson:
>>> >
>>> https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/s720x720/11054528_787964504635057_1641660292361840553_n.jpg?oh=ada1d2bdc3257b18e0021d43c08da3fa&oe=55BAC5FE&__gda__=1438140227_e082f8b8e0791a363f79e8411600264d
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> ><mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>>> > Better than during work.
>>> >
>>> > Sent from my Windows Phone
>>> > ________________________________
>>> > From: lindsey kiviets<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
>>> > Sent: ‎2015-‎03-‎11 15:39
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
>>> > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> >
>>> > fapping after work is not good
>>> >
>>> > ________________________________
>>> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:36:37 +0200
>>> > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> > From: euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx>>
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Cool, after 5:30pm would be cool. Just have something to do after work.
>>> >
>>> > On 11 Mar 2015 3:26 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>><mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>> wrote:
>>> > yes imda bes,
>>> >
>>> > I didn't know you believed in me so much.
>>> >
>>> > ________________________________
>>> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:17:37 +0200
>>> > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>>>
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
>>> >
>>> > lol, that depends on you. You're actually playing well - less aimless
>>> orbs which get you punished like Sap said, better conversions/damage from
>>> her forward k overhead and your win rate will improve imo.
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:31 PM, lindsey kiviets <
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>><mailto:
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>> wrote:
>>> > I sense sarcasm in that sentence.
>>> >
>>> > ________________________________
>>> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:26:10 +0200
>>> > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>>>
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Yes but LB's Millia gets stronger every Saturday. At the rate he's
>>> going, he should be the best in around three to four weeks.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>><mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>> wrote:
>>> > Indeed...
>>> >
>>> > I could have played a bunch more if Stu didnt abandon me for JHB :P
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > But you will need wait till Saturday to fondle the waifu's grenades
>>> unfortunately
>>> >
>>> > :(
>>> >
>>> > ________________________________
>>> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:14:52 +0200
>>> > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> > From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>>>
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Yeah keep running with that waifu of your. lol
>>> > I wish we played GG on a daily basis :(
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>><mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>> wrote:
>>> > I am no good for this evening unfortunately :(
>>> >
>>> > ________________________________
>>> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:07:59 +0200
>>> > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto:
>>> ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>>
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I'll be there.
>>> >
>>> > On 11 Mar 2015 14:03, "euraima tobias" <euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> euraima@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx
>>> >><mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:
>>> euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx>>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Do you guys feel for a session tonight?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > **********************************************************************
>>> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>> >
>>> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>> >
>>> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>> >
>>> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>> > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing
>>> list.
>>> >
>>> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > **********************************************************************
>>> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>> >
>>> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>> >
>>> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>> >
>>> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>> **********************************************************************
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member
>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Other related posts: