Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:22:00 +0200

Yep.

But the one i listed is because you guys know why you lost. And learn. Also
the ruthlessness you guys go for. If it works, do it. Some people are too
polite...and just want to do fancy shit when they can't even master the
basics of df+1 d+4 jab punishment.

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Well everyone can cause issues and no one is unbeatable. That’s part of
> the fun.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
> *Sent:* 25 February 2015 11:53 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> In my personal opinion. I think the list should be longer.
>
> The ones you posted LB are the ones i don't have much of an issue fighting
> with as much as those you didn't post as Tekken Gods.
>
> Like, (no order)
>
> Manase (On point wiff punishment)
>
> Ben (mastered how to tag and catch raw tag players)
>
> Stu (when he plays A.King and does his db+3 bullshit)
>
> Steve (when i play Dragunov because he ducks every high string i have)
>
> Lumi's Jaycee is solid
>
> Sap's Raven got me very confused...also he jab punish which is a major
> thing that some people neglect.
>
> Amos (Bob's b+22 and he throws A DAMN LOT)
>
>
>
> I'm sure there's more to add to the list but i haven't had enough playtime
> to analyze properly.
>
> With a bit more training and patience. Those people on the list can take
> me out. They're only losing to things they don't really know like
> Hwoarang's strings and +frames. Lars flashy stuff. Zafina's ws2 BS. etc.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  lolz
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:06 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  the 4 SA gods in tekken r, in no particular order.
>
> Bloodmist
> TG
> HS
> DI
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:04:05 -0800
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Hoooo,, I must play the SA GODS OF TEKKEN,, I reallyyyyy want too
>
> On Feb 25, 2015 9:47 AM, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Yeah, I wonder. Last time TG was supposed to make it to help Colin set
> up the TTT2. If he does come, then at least there will be proper
> competition there. Since DP doesn’t seem to be organising tournaments up
> here anymore, this is probably the only place I’ll get to play the guy.
>
>
>
> I don’t know if you are aware of all the fun and games we’ve had with the
> MSSA, Rich. In theory all the provinces have tournaments. In reality all of
> them except the Western Cape have tournaments.
>
>
>
> They don’t seem to get up to a lot, but they did send Vic overseas and
> Dot’s girlfriend has travelled quite a bit as the SA female Tekken champ.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft
> *Sent:* 25 February 2015 8:50 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> Sounds fun., hope you destroy them all
>
> On Feb 25, 2015 8:45 AM, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  About an hour’s drive from where I am now – Klerksdorp.
>
>
>
> I wouldn’t be arsed with making a separate trip for this kinda stuff, but
> if it’s happening here, maybe I can go along and spend the time stuffing
> around with my machine and their screen.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft
> *Sent:* 25 February 2015 8:41 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> Where is this thing??
>
> On Feb 25, 2015 8:40 AM, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Lol, I’m still on the MSSA mailing list from way back when. I see that
> the North West champs are happening in next Saturday. Maybe I’ll take a
> drive over there and see what’s going on.
>
> I have serious doubts about the level of competition, which means I could
> compete in the SF section as well.
>
>
>
> While I don’t actually care about this stuff all that much, this seems
> like an opportunity to actually play a game. That’s been sorely lacking in
> my life for the past month.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 25 February 2015 7:56 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> you not allowed to possess shares anywhere in the world?
>
> wtf?
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 05:52:01 +0000
>
> Depends on how much you earn.
>
> The more money you make, the more tax you pay and it is getting worse.
>
>
>
> There are other countries with higher tax rates than ours, but they
> usually provide more stuff, like free education.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft
> *Sent:* 25 February 2015 7:49 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> How bad is this????
>
> On Feb 25, 2015 7:39 AM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  because of some huge loan by Eskom, the government has to acquire the
> money from somewhere.
>
> Our manager believes from a loketest it was gathered that:
> VAT might be increased to 15% with more basic foodstuffs being zero rated
> to not negatively influence the poor. (nerf and a buff)
>
> Capital gains tax will be increased to 50% no longer 33%. - Huge nerf to
> the 1%
>
> Also add another level of taxation above 40% for the 1%, speculation is ,
> it will increase to 45%.  - huge nerf to the rich as well.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 05:30:44 +0000
>
> I miss Trevor Manual’s speeches. They were cool. Interesting speech, nice
> anecdotes, some jokes and end it all with no increase in PAYE.
>
> Pretty sure we’re gonna get screwed on the tax this year.
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 25 February 2015 7:29 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> budget speech today, word on the street... everyone is gna get f!@$!@.
>
> Prepare your aaahnus
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:04:44 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I think the environmental factor only occurs at end of a round. Which is
> good. Injustice's stage change is a bit much...
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> *lmao*
>
> On 24 Feb 2015 20:44, "Sean Carrington" <theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  NASH BERNSTEIN ! #GENOCIDECUTTER !
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Is that trailer for real ?
> Looks like injusticeXstreetfighter
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 24 February 2015 at 20:26, richard moorcroft <
> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Bison needs to die,, he is very ugly,, I MEAN REALLY UGLY
>
> On Feb 24, 2015 8:24 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  okay so bison is still alive then.
>
> so the story, its still before strike but after sf4?
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 20:10:12 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JT-IvFkUhA&feature=youtu.be
>
>
>
> frankenstein nash for SF5?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Lolz
>
> btw Katarina. She's too funny. Saw a match where King was doing all these
> set up throws and combo. Only to be beaten by a noob Katarina literally
> spamming 1 button. Uf+4444444444444444444444 ftw
>
>
>
> Her magic 4 combo is 44444444444444444444444444 does more damage than
> fancy shit combos for other characters.
>
>
>
> Lee is dead. Welcome Katarina!
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I should also mention that my folks never divorced and I was not beaten as
> a child.
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 24, 2015, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Table view represent.
>
> Last I heard the kids were mixing their pre work out roids with brandy and
> coke.
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 24, 2015, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  You should check out the last few minutes of the pilot stream of 18
> minutes [just before Manase comes up].
>
>
>
> The LB and Chad special when they see themselves on stream for the first
> time :P
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Listening to the start of the stream and hearing GB shout in frustration
> made me laff.
>
> On 24 Feb 2015 16:28, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  And from our "Not-The-Onion" department:
>
>
>
> People don’t take hurricanes as seriously if they have a feminine name and
> the consequences are deadly, finds a new groundbreaking study.
> Female-named storms have historically killed more because people neither
> consider them as risky nor take the same precautions, the study published
> in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences concludes.
>
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2014/06/02/female-named-hurricanes-kill-more-than-male-because-people-dont-respect-them-study-finds
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Regarding our Power Rangers discussion on Saturday:
>
>
>
> https://vimeo.com/120401488
>
>
>
> Oh and apparently it was the Red Ranger who killed his room mate with a
> sword.  He was arrested, but I don't believe he was charged yet.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>   ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2015