Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:14:05 +0200

Lolz that sounds like a plot for a Hangover movie.

Not sure about divorce rate. But having a side chick and fucking around is
pretty high in thailand...even though they don't really speak about it. Not
too surprised though. All the "massage" facilities there...

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm pretty sure TableView has a higher divorce rate than Thailand.
>
> In 2008 we were in Pathaya.  We walked into a Go go bar - the same kind
> you just described.  Basically the girls dance in a glass booth and you
> call their number.  Our one friend was really drunk at the time.  He walked
> in, sat down and started waving all his money around, and shouting the
> numbers of all the girls.
>
> 41!  32!  26!  18!
>
> This caused a bit of a problem because some girls who had already settled
> at another customer's table came running over even though their numbers
> weren't called.  We nearly got into a fight with some random bloke.
> Eventually my friend just settled on a petite chick who wouldn't be out of
> place in Melty Blood.  I spent the rest of the night walking around and
> taking photos of random stuff.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Lolz damn.
>>
>> Well, in thailand the girls are lined up in booth or glass display. Then
>> you pick a number. They are price range too lolz XD
>> There's so many "massage" facilities everywhere. No wonder the infidelity
>> rate in thailand is among the highest in the world. -_- not shining a good
>> light on my home country here.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Interestingly enough, that's part of the theoretical app's capabilities
>>> :p
>>>
>>> In the words of my mate's wonderfully wise dad "The first thing I do
>>> when I land in a new city is look for a f*ck".
>>>
>>> To facilitate these types of requests, the masseur will be logged into
>>> the client app with GPS enabled (they can disable this, of course).  The
>>> customer logs in and requests all professionals within a 10km radius.  Done.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's not like we can track (masseurs) like the car route for uber cabs
>>>> lolz.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That would be between the customer and the professional.  Your
>>>>> business makes money by either facilitating the transaction, and/or 
>>>>> hosting
>>>>> profiles.  A Yellow Pages of sorts.  Anything beyond that is out of your
>>>>> hands.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  I can see how this would work, but one of the important things with
>>>>>> Uber – and with how this one would work – is that the total amount 
>>>>>> charged
>>>>>> is known beforehand and that no cash needs to exchange hands.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This means that the ‘fragrant oils’ and whatnot need to be understood
>>>>>> clearly by both parties – and the costs thereof. If you are offering a
>>>>>> venue, or even aid in setting the people up through your app, you cannot
>>>>>> claim ignorance over what they’re actually doing. If you do go that 
>>>>>> route,
>>>>>> then the people using your app (and I mean the masseurs) are committing
>>>>>> fraud by promising one thing (pine fresh oil) and delivering another 
>>>>>> (happy
>>>>>> ending). That is still a problem for you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
>>>>>> *Sent:* 24 February 2015 1:57 PM
>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aah... but that's where the other part of the conversation comes in :P
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Two of the big problems with brothels are:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1.  They are illegal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2.  The business owner has a lot of overhead that aren't directly
>>>>>> related to the product (eg. premises, security etc).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, we cut out the risk and overheads by providing a platform where
>>>>>> professionals (let's say "masseurs") can sign up.  Your app brings back a
>>>>>> list of these professionals, and you book an appointment with them.  On
>>>>>> their profiles, there's an indicator that says "Entertains personal
>>>>>> requests *nudge nudge wink wink*".  When the customer clicks on this, it
>>>>>> opens a chat session and he asks if they are willing to wear a nurse
>>>>>> outfits, use environmentally friendly oils etc.  The app doesn't save the
>>>>>> chat session unless the professional reports it (eg. as a record of
>>>>>> harassment - can be exploited though).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So now, whatever the client and professional do is between them and
>>>>>> you don't have to worry about providing a premises to accommodate their
>>>>>> clearly legal arrangement.  Oh and of course you can rate the service -
>>>>>> just like Uber.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, regarding the credit cards.  Just do what The Grand does in
>>>>>> JHB.  Depending on which CC machine you use at the premises, it will
>>>>>> generate a different company name - but never The Grand.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I dunno how the law works here, so no idea if this would be possible.
>>>>>> Isn’t prostitution illegal in SA?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If people could put through the ratings anonymously, you’re back to
>>>>>> same problem of not being able to trust it. While it would be a great 
>>>>>> idea
>>>>>> – especially for keeping people from stealing the prostitutes money or
>>>>>> failing to pay her. Who is going to register their credit card details 
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> an organisation that skirts the law so closely though?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   ------------------------------
>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other 
>>>>>> information
>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, 
>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing 
>>>>>> services
>>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>>> Information
>>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Other related posts: