Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Moshe Shevel <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 20:57:00 +0200

Hasn't been confirmed yet, but I'd be very surprised if he didn't make it
in due to his appearance in, what I think was, Quan's ending in MK9.

There's still quite a lot of free spaces left in the current karakter
selektion skreen, so there should still be quite a few new and old faces to
be revealed. Also there's that apparent guest character that they're
putting in and some future DLC they've wanted to do as well
On 16 Jan 2015 8:51 PM, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Is Shinnok confirmed? would be cool to see him.
>
> They need to show more new faces. How many slots left for
> returning/resurrected faces? 2-3?
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Don't have much hope for Shang Tsung, but I expect I'll get my sorcerer
>> nonsense on with Quan and Shinnok
>> On 16 Jan 2015 16:37, "Moshe Shevel" <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Ermac... that is all.
>>> On 16 Jan 2015 4:34 PM, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Seeing that dead characters are returning out of no where left and
>>>> right...Nightwolf may return...
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Zombie Nightwolf!
>>>>>
>>>>> They need to bring him back :(
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:32:03 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> MKX!!! That game is looking very good. Character design is more
>>>>> mature, which is good. Less bikini and thongs for the ladies. Kitana's new
>>>>> look actually is pretty well designed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't T7 suppose to release around Feb-March?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Drag and Leo are there. He’ll be fine.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyways, this is all besides the point. In April MKX hits. That’s all
>>>>> that really matters, you know?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>>>> *Sent:* 16 January 2015 4:26 PM
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ben is just mad because NONE of the characters he plays is in T7 at
>>>>> the moment. :P
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> They killed Lei and made 6 characters out of him. Hahaha
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Guilty Gear IS a good game
>>>>>
>>>>> Forget about Tekken
>>>>>
>>>>> :D
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 06:22:10 -0800
>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> TEKKEN 7 might be a good game,, I hope
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 16, 2015 4:08 PM, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  How wrong is rubbish I don't scare for him.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 16 January 2015 at 15:21, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Well they do take damage even if the Power Crush through your
>>>>> moves...which is one thing that's making the Power Crush system fair.
>>>>> However, if your opponent is at 90% hp while you're at 20%? they can just
>>>>> spam Power Crush until it hits...Risk and Reward is unfair at that point 
>>>>> :/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:19 PM, richard moorcroft <
>>>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is a power crush + frames??? That doesn't make sense,, it must at
>>>>> least be -10 or more,, not safe that is bad_,, if they are safe it can be
>>>>> abused alot
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 16, 2015 2:59 PM, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Nope. His pokes/flamingo mix up is nerfed to useless because Power
>>>>> Crush just beats everything out of his FLA stance. He can do lows in FLA 
>>>>> to
>>>>> counter act Power Crush. But his lows in FLA is weak...also some Power
>>>>> Crush is pretty fast...so it might beat his FLA lows anyways...that's why 
>>>>> i
>>>>> said Power Crush should all have the same frame or something...cos it's a
>>>>> little unfair that some character have better Power Crush than
>>>>> some...Lili's one launches and it's -12...Feng's is +frame on
>>>>> block...Paul's too...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> His combo has always been high damage. But in Tekken...combo doesn't
>>>>> mean everything...if you can't land your launchers...your high damage
>>>>> combos just goes to waste...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:55 PM, richard moorcroft <
>>>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So they Nerf the guy,, but give him a combo that costs you your life
>>>>> after he pokes the hell out of you?? I call that a super buffed up 
>>>>> character
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 16, 2015 2:47 PM, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  He's kindda ridiculous in TTT2...d+3,4 being NC is nuts lolz
>>>>> 4,3/4,3~b FLA mix up. Only issue of Hwoarang is WS punishment. But other
>>>>> than that, he got a lot of tools during TTT2 that helps him a lot. Also i
>>>>> TTT2 health bar in Tag mode is lower...so Hwoarang's combo and poke does
>>>>> ridiculously high damage compare to other character...Because when i did
>>>>> 1v1 with Vic...d+3,4 does shit damage like in BR.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But i think it's more in-direct nerf to him in T7:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Removing Bound also removes his ability to combo off his FLA low trip.
>>>>>
>>>>> u+3+4 now launches back turn...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But his combo potential is still top notch in T7. The new tailspin
>>>>> mechanic favors him. Saw a JFSR combo that is more than 70% of your
>>>>> life...Nuts.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2015