Damn. Some of the people in tekkenzaibatsu are stupid...even the mods... On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nope > > Playstation exclusive > > Sofar atleast > > ------------------------------ > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:27:47 +0200 > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > But isn't GG on the x-box? > On 20 Feb 2015 13:26, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My PS4 has been getting plenty playtime. > The Infamous dlc, Saints Row Re-elected+Gat outta hell. > From Dust > Lately, Guilty Gear. > On 20 Feb 2015 11:16, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Till later today I havent played anything on my PS4 since Infamous last > year :P > > > I blame myself for getting all the games on PC instead... > > ------------------------------ > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:13:52 +0000 > > tbh ive only played volgar the Viking on it , and that was in January. > > I blame xrd and d3. > > ------------------------------ > From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:02:36 +0000 > > Are you even using the thing? > > What games do you have for it? > > ------------------------------ > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:57:08 +0000 > > f u!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:53:56 +0000 > > You are stuck with a Xbone so you wouldn't be getting it either way :P > > ------------------------------ > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:51:50 +0000 > > gamespot said the game is boring. > > I saw the review. > > ------------------------------ > From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:14:17 +0000 > > Anybody else picking up The Order today? > > ------------------------------ > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 07:34:52 +0000 > > I need to get back into Initial D, I just read the first manga. > > Zombie will you have any objections to putting those manga books up as a > prize for Kami? > > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 23:13:53 -0800 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > This is gay,, but it was very funny > On Feb 20, 2015 8:55 AM, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Initial D has gotten weird since I last watched. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nk2wViKSh_M > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Tempted to do the same. Will make doing combo vids a lot easier. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 10:46 PM > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > > Ill most likely get it on PC > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:28:25 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > btw, anyone getting MKX on PC? > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > They'll probably be an expansion like Tekken 6 then Tekken 6 BR / TTT2 > and then TTT2U. > > Which should be around the same release date as consoles. > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir < > nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My problem with Tekken 7, is that by the time we get to play it, It'll be > old. > Or are the release dates closer together? > On 19 Feb 2015 21:28, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So I was watching some of the T7 stuff and thought about the character > select screen. > If they keep the character portraits at the same size then that would > mean we can hopefully expect 12 more characters. > Here's to hoping. > made a pic to illustrate the idea :/ > > > > On 19 February 2015 at 20:47, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > damn dat new age skateboard tech, combining parkour and skating. > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:29:45 +0200 > > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Jaws is definitely gnarly. > He must have that adamantium frame tech. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vy1vuubPhDs > > On 19 February 2015 at 20:27, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > The parry ? > > > On 19 February 2015 at 19:26, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > His Lee Sliding command also df~d~df+3 but have a MUCH longer reach than > Lee Sliding. It has the same range if not slighting more than Raven's BT > ff+3+4 > > During his dash stance df df he can do Wang's b+1,4 > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I will use the slide :) > > On 19 February 2015 at 19:11, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So much Shaheen footage...i'm already starting to know how to play him > lolz > > Need more Katarina, Chloe footage. > > Claudio's footage is usually people trying to figure his glowing hand > aka "starburst" mech. > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Di here is some more T7. > Bappara is a OG Japanese Lee expert that I steal from. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTUFkGtFLoU > > On 19 February 2015 at 17:55, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > The MK series had a lot of boinking. > There was a tribe of boinking chicks that would steal "life essence" from > their partners. > Reptile boinked the most. He was immune to their "powers" Go figure. > It didn't hurt that the girls in the story were good looking either. That > hollywood make-up magic. > Oh, and plastic surgery, natch. > On 19 Feb 2015 17:12, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > lol > > That and Naruto/Bleach/One Piece seem to be the autopilot troll response > whenever people ask "What anime is that" in AMVs or other media etc. > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:55:42 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fucksakes I just googled that here at work. > smh :) > > On 19 February 2015 at 16:53, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > He could have said "Boku no Pico"... > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:49:39 +0200 > > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > I hate you. > > On 19 February 2015 at 16:47, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think it’s Naruto. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 4:42 PM > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail > > > Dawie's origimal name is David. > > Does anyone remember that cartoon with the green mice in the theater ? > May have been french. > Can't think of the name and google aint helping. > > On 19 February 2015 at 16:22, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Me neither. > Didn’t understand enough Afrikaans. Same with Brakenjan. Watched some > stuff that was simulcast. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 4:21 PM > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > Really?? I never watched the show > On Feb 19, 2015 4:06 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dawie doesnt die. He turns into an oaktree. > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:34:03 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Firstly I would like to thank you guys for using the correct move name for > raisins. > Secondly I have to say that I SS hopkick delayed raisins like a fucking > champion. > > :) > > On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > "Ek is Daaaaawie, die KABBBBOUUUTTTER!!" Damn, the feels *lmao* > On 19 Feb 2015 15:24, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Oh shit! I didn't realise Dawie die Kabouter dies in the end. > > Come on, sing along everyone! > > DAWIE DIE KABOUTER AFRIKAANS INTRO LIED > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iymgR6fbzDI> > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Paul has great punishment. > > Im sure something will hit. > > > You guys created your own Lei myth about his stances not being punishable > lol. > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:01:25 +0000 > > Are these all the cases where you’re badly negative, but totally > unpunishable? > > Sorry, but I still don’t care that you don’t get continuous rush down. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 2:54 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > Its great but that also kinda points out the problem. > > To get into Tiger(4th razor hit) you need razor CH or do delay > shenanigans. Would have been nice to be on enough plus to force the > opponent to block the incoming mixup instead getting to bait retaliation. > > Tiger is not really a problem tho since its the most usefull stance imo. > It actually has answers for whatever the opponent does. > Snake can mostly handle itself as well. > > Panther and Dragon needs some help on their transitions. > > > This is all talking about transitions on HIT. > > On blocked razor into Tiger lei is at -14. > Other stance transitions from razor on block are all worse than -10 on > block as well. > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:38:57 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > I saw a few Lei player then to go into Tiger after razor rush on hit and > then hold back so you dash out of their range of their dick punch or their > retaliation. That's where TGR 4 launches them. It's a weird set up but it > works for those who are bad under pressure of razor rush and just think > dick punch solves everything. > Not sure if it'll work the same on block though. > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > On block I dont mind. > > They just need to buff the frames on hit. > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:13:03 +0200 > > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > I know they nerfed his razor rush a few times. > It use to razor rush on block into stance and guess. > Now razor rush on block into stance...dick punch/generic d+4 stops all. > Lei's turn to guess...Unless his stances have hopkick...razor rush is not > as strong as it used to be in old times. Also the razor rush sidestep into > stances used to cover much more distance. I remember i could almost go into > opponent's back if they do something linear or dick punch. > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It wasn’t just his combo damage was it? > I might be wrong, but didn’t they buff his damage for other moves? I’m > thinking very specifically of raisin rush on CH. > > I think you just need to get off your lazy ass and learn how to do Lei’s > punishment game properly. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 2:04 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > The problem is once he loses his damage(Im fairly sure hes not going to > keep it) he going to be below average again unless his actual moves are > improved. > > Trackings/Frames or otherwise > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:52:15 +0000 > Paul’s d+1 doesn’t track all that well. Generally you are forced to use > it because it’s his only fast-ish mid. He doesn’t have a generic df+1. You > have df+2 at 15f, but that’s punishable. > Meh, as Steve said, we’ve had these discussions before and they go round > and round. Paul doesn’t need better tracking. He’s got his good punishment, > nice wall game and good mid range moves. What he lacks is tracking or any > sort of plus on block/ rush down game. If they give those to him, well then > he jumps a bit in the tier list. Would I like those added? Sure. Is it a > major issue not having them? Not really. > > Lei doesn’t need trackers. He has enough other tools. Are they good enough > to make him top tier? Hell no. Is he still playable? Sure. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 1:44 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail > > Paul's d+1 tracks really well. He also have a generic db+4. > Sure it's not as damaging as some homing move. But they're pokes that is > fast and stops your opponent from walking around freely. And on hit, it > puts you back to "your" game. Instead of defending and waiting to land a > b+2 homing. > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > what does paul get off his Tracker on hit/CH? > > I think Lei's is 1f slower(24f) with absolutely zero reward because he is > forced to taunt. > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:35:24 +0000 > > Sure, while you’re at it, why not give Paul a tracker that’s under 25f > as well. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 1:33 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > Or make 1+2 track. > > Its high so can be ducked and stuff > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:27:31 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Without ff+3...Lei has df+3 which is bad...especially on hit XD > If they just make ff+3 a homing move, i wouldn't mind that. It's the > fact it's not and we keep thinking we can step it... > If they make Lei like Brad Wong. I'm quitting. That drunken BS is too > fluid with no space for interruption between stance transition. > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Dude ff+3 has stupid tracking. > Lei will track fine without it doing both sides track. > > > On 19 February 2015 at 13:21, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Lei's options getting stepped is already his a major weakness he has. > > He cant punish stepping properly and his trackers are ass. > > Its not even like ff+3 tracks properly either(And im fairly sure its only > to one side). Cant decide to ff+3 because I think the opponent is going to > step. > > Lei is no better gameplay wise than he was in T6. His damage boost is the > only reason hes considered High in TTT2. > > Nerfing his tracking is the very last thing Lei needs. > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:14:29 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I would just make ff+3 a bit more linear ~ able to walk it to one side > or something. > Most of the tier list I've seen for TTT2 put him quite high. > > ...............There is nothing new we could discuss about Lei, we > always bitch about him. > > On 19 February 2015 at 11:45, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Spam raisin rush. You don’t need anything else. > > I wonder what they’ve done about Lei’s combo damage. Just that isn’t > enough to help a character. Hwo always has high combo damage, but lacks the > other tools to make him top tier. Lei, however, also has good punishment > and average pokes. > > Got to say that I don’t think Lei is a particularly low character. I’d put > him happily mid – probably below Paul though. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 11:38 AM > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > > lol > > They could... but then hes going to need major buffs in order to compete. > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:34:12 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Remove ff+3. > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > His "poking" and non gimmicky stance game is not great. If you remove > the shenanigans hes a below average character. > > So if they remove half his moves. Ie less gimmicks he needs stronger > tools to play a more normal game. > > > He got a big damage buff in TTT2 but they didnt fix any of the core > problems with his moves sadly. > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:25:30 +0000 > > Lei needs buffs? LOL! > Good one Paas. I need that. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 11:12 AM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > They could pretty much dump half of Lei's movelist but then they would > have to buff the rest of his stuff. > > Currently he has boatload of very situational moves combined with some > that are just straight up bad. > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:02:06 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Lei and Capo lolz They need to remove some of their stuff and update > them properly. > Zafina might have a large move list. But all her moves are decent and > useful. > I wouldn't mind if they do a total revamp like they did for SC5. Maybe > the series needs it. But keep some of the original cast and strong point of > Tekken. > Lucky Chloe moves are basically Capo Light. The same but doesn't > knockdown lolz. She have a slippery kick that doesn't knock down and looks > punishable as hell. On hit doesn't stagger or give much frames either T_T > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > >