They could buff his df+1 df+4 and make his d+4 better (i hate his d+4...he doesn't duck and kick...so prone to being CH by ewgf). And make him taller. This would make him much more consistent with his tracking. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Let blazing track > > Just reduce the pushback and make it punishable like ff+3. > > You will quickly realise that it doesnt actually help your character > "track" at all. > > When you need "tracking" you cant be throwing moves like ff+3. > You are usually in peoples faces. > > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:36:47 +0200 > > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > If Lei can have track then I want blazing to track :( > Lee's tracking also sucks 1+2 is okay but very slow. > So you just track with d/f+1 d/f+4 3,3 ...... > > Would rather go back to no homing moves and they fine tune tracking per > move. > > On 19 February 2015 at 13:32, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Or make 1+2 track. > > Its high so can be ducked and stuff > > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:27:31 +0200 > > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Without ff+3...Lei has df+3 which is bad...especially on hit XD > > If they just make ff+3 a homing move, i wouldn't mind that. It's the fact > it's not and we keep thinking we can step it... > > If they make Lei like Brad Wong. I'm quitting. That drunken BS is too > fluid with no space for interruption between stance transition. > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Dude ff+3 has stupid tracking. > Lei will track fine without it doing both sides track. > > > On 19 February 2015 at 13:21, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Lei's options getting stepped is already his a major weakness he has. > > He cant punish stepping properly and his trackers are ass. > > Its not even like ff+3 tracks properly either(And im fairly sure its only > to one side). Cant decide to ff+3 because I think the opponent is going to > step. > > Lei is no better gameplay wise than he was in T6. His damage boost is the > only reason hes considered High in TTT2. > > Nerfing his tracking is the very last thing Lei needs. > > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:14:29 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > I would just make ff+3 a bit more linear ~ able to walk it to one side or > something. > Most of the tier list I've seen for TTT2 put him quite high. > > ...............There is nothing new we could discuss about Lei, we always > bitch about him. > > On 19 February 2015 at 11:45, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Spam raisin rush. You don’t need anything else. > > I wonder what they’ve done about Lei’s combo damage. Just that isn’t > enough to help a character. Hwo always has high combo damage, but lacks the > other tools to make him top tier. Lei, however, also has good punishment > and average pokes. > > Got to say that I don’t think Lei is a particularly low character. I’d put > him happily mid – probably below Paul though. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 11:38 AM > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > > lol > > They could... but then hes going to need major buffs in order to compete. > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:34:12 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Remove ff+3. > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > His "poking" and non gimmicky stance game is not great. If you remove > the shenanigans hes a below average character. > > So if they remove half his moves. Ie less gimmicks he needs stronger > tools to play a more normal game. > > > He got a big damage buff in TTT2 but they didnt fix any of the core > problems with his moves sadly. > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:25:30 +0000 > > Lei needs buffs? LOL! > Good one Paas. I need that. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 11:12 AM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > They could pretty much dump half of Lei's movelist but then they would > have to buff the rest of his stuff. > > Currently he has boatload of very situational moves combined with some > that are just straight up bad. > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:02:06 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Lei and Capo lolz They need to remove some of their stuff and update > them properly. > Zafina might have a large move list. But all her moves are decent and > useful. > I wouldn't mind if they do a total revamp like they did for SC5. Maybe > the series needs it. But keep some of the original cast and strong point of > Tekken. > Lucky Chloe moves are basically Capo Light. The same but doesn't > knockdown lolz. She have a slippery kick that doesn't knock down and looks > punishable as hell. On hit doesn't stagger or give much frames either T_T > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > > >