Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:48:49 +0200

We have March for the full build and release. And even so, probably a good
year before it comes to console. So a lot can change and hopefully it will.

TTT2 changed a few things from TTT2 and TTT2U (console version). Capo's
b+14 was 16frames and didn't NCC in TTT2 original arcade release. Once TTT2
updated to TTT2U. The pain enters.

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I agree that options were rather limited at the time, but the introduction
> of new FGs had very little to do with my dislike of T6. That said, l'm just
> basing this on my own experiences. Not saying it was the same for everyone
> else.
>
> I've always been a VF fan, more so than Tekken, but l've enjoyed both
> series in addition to other FGs over the years. However, if l'm not feeling
> something, regardless of how much l've enjoyed previous iterations, l'm not
> going to stick with it. It could be the next VF for all l care and l would
> drop that shit if it didn't meet my expectations. And it should... After
> all, l'm paying for it.
> On 18 Feb 2015 15:31, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Maybe I just like it less...
>>
>> I was never a Tekken fan from the start.  I got into fighters with GG#R
>> and SC2.
>>
>> Then once I got a console I wanted to get into the scene...  but there
>> was nothing except tekken.
>>
>> The game may have been good but we also didnt have any other option till
>> much later during the T6 Era.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:17:50 +0200
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> That's complete bullshit.
>>
>> T5DR was a solid Tekken game. If you want to talk about a game that
>> rewarded time put in and had a well-balanced cast, that was it. You were
>> rewarded for good movement and spacing, and the game ultimately felt less
>> about combos than it did about pokes and mixups.
>>
>> I can't speak for anyone else but l loved that game; not because l had no
>> choice but because it was immensely fun and rewarding to play. It was the
>> last Tekken game l thoroughly enjoyed playing.
>>
>> If T6 had been anything like DR, I probably would have spent more time
>> with it.
>> On 18 Feb 2015 15:03, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> that's true that paas wrote.
>>
>> t5dr was cool coz we had no choice but to like it.
>>
>> then sf4 came , then marvel then kof, it just snowballed away from tekken.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:59:34 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> And that's the game fault? You lost to a random joe is entirely your
>> fault because you don't know how to fight an alisa, capo, whatever?
>>
>> I don't know why it's not as popular in Cape Town. But from the mails,
>> it's simply they were interested in other games and Tekken wasn't their
>> first choice anyways. T6BR was probably more popular in CT because it
>> didn't have a lot of competitors in the fighting game industry when it came
>> out. I don't see anyone say it isn't much fun as BR or anything like that.
>> I think it's the same for the west. More options for fighting games.
>> Nothing to do with TTT2 being ass.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  That’s a bit of a massive generalisation there. Every top player loved
>> the game? The game died in the West because Eastern players were better at
>> it? I don’t know about that. I think  TTT2 failed in the West because
>> people in the West don’t like the game. It’s that simple.
>> Why do you think people in Cape Town didn’t play it much? It is because
>> we were upset about the nerfs to Bob, or the skill gap between us and
>> Koreans? No, it’s because the game just wasn’t as much fun as the previous
>> ones.
>> People weren’t put off by the fact that they would dump a massive amount
>> of time into the game and then get bopped by Knee. They were upset that a
>> random joe off the street who’d been playing the game for 3 months, would
>> rock up and random his way to a win.
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 2:35 PM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>
>>  Because the west couldn't compete with the east. Every top player loved
>> TTT2 because it's the most balanced tekken out there. Sure there's some
>> crazy stuff like Capo's b+1,4 but top player don't see an issue. They
>> barely eat that CH. Those who eat b+1,4 are just spamming mindlessly and
>> deserve to be punished with that.
>>
>>  I don't think TTT2 died because the game sucked. T6BR was already
>> suffering with the release of so many new fighting games. TTT2 also have a
>> higher learning curve than the generic BR where the west just spams one
>> move until they win. TTT2 you can't do that...TTT2 really showed who are
>> the top players and who are not. Simply because SS got better, spammable
>> moves don't exist. So the west quit. Bob can't spam d+1 until he wins...all
>> his other shit is getting SS'd or SW'd. Way to solve that? learn to SS and
>> SW...but they play Bob like a 2D game. Master backdash and forward
>> dash...which is good for footsies but Tekken rewards SS and SW a lot too.
>>
>>  TTT2 came out late in the west too. That also contribute the skill gap
>> between the west and the east. Why would the west play a game where they
>> have little to no chance of winning in events when JDCR, Knee shows up? So
>> they get put off by the fact they will spend time and money and get nothing
>> in return.
>>
>>  On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  They’re changing the game. I’m a little surprised considering how much
>> people in the East loved TTT2.
>>
>> In the West, it tanked. People hated the game. It barely made it to Evo
>> and then only because some people complained. Hell, let’s stop and look at
>> Cape Town and the people who play Tekken and are on the emails here. That
>> would be you, me, Paas, Steve, Lumi, Manase, Sap, Kahn, Shraf... Richard as
>> well, but I didn’t play much against him in the previous game.
>> Who of those on the list actually played much TTT2? I mean compared to T6
>> or T5. For those of you who actually played a lot of the old ones – Sap,
>> Lumi and Manase specifically – how much did you enjoy TTT2 and how much of
>> it did you play?
>>
>> I see a lot of huge changes to T7 and a lot of bitching about how they’re
>> catering to noobs and how the top players won’t put up with it. I’m not
>> overly concerned about it. Tekken in the West, and here in Cape Town, died
>> with TTT2. If they don’t something to massively change that, what is the
>> point?
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 1:58 PM
>>
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>  Also f+1+3 and f+2+4 are used as homing moves because it tracks all
>> sides.
>>
>>  So normal throws are extremely useful.
>>
>>  First they dumb down the wake ups and oki...now throws? they're really
>> trying to appeal to noobs and new player more than top players...since top
>> players will eventually quit anyways...#fucklogic...
>>
>>  Rage art is useless. None of the top player are eating it at all lolz.
>> Unless Rage Arts can be used in between strings...i don't see much use for
>> it at all. Power Crush is interesting but doesn't seem too out of the
>> ordinary.
>>
>>  On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  I use A LOT of normal throws. Some character's normal throws are part of
>> their game since it puts them on decent oki wake ups.
>>
>>  Me not breaking throws has nothing to do with making throws easier to
>> break. I'm not complaining about me not breaking throws...i'm complaining
>> the fact they made 1+3 and 2+4 throws completely useless. 1+3 2+4 throws
>> plays a big part in top level. You sidestep and throw and try to block the
>> throw animation with your movement and position. Making it even harder to
>> see what throws you did. Now? fuck, useless...1+2 throws are used in
>> different situation. They are usually used for their small throw break
>> window.
>>
>>  On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  And that from the guy who can’t break throws. Will this actually make
>> any difference? Who uses normal throws?
>> The only time I get a normal 1+3/2+4 throw with Paul is by accident. Most
>> characters have special throws with 1,2 and 1+2 breaks, so what’s the issue?
>> I do use the normal throws with King, but I suppose I shouldn’t.
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 12:08 PM
>>
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>
>> http://www.avoidingthepuddle.com/news/2015/2/17/tekken-7-all-13-and-24-throws-can-be-broken-with-either-1-or.html
>>
>>  I hope this isn't true...otherwise, it's going to make the game suck.
>>
>>  On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Lili's hair looks nice :)
>>
>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoAeIOXYRHw
>>
>>  On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mw-EYlDoeA4
>>
>>  Oh shit! Dragunov Sweep = Full combo now :D
>>
>>  On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:55 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  lol u not ryt
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:53:53 +0000
>>
>>  Why not? What are they going to do, sue some random FGC in CT? If they
>> do send a cease and desist letter, it will be good publicity.
>>
>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 9:48 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>  im really excited about Saturday. SAP has some evil plans for us.
>>
>> main thing im concerned about is getting dat publicity out.
>>
>> im imaging an overlay with kamimodo and cts logo. with facebook kuk
>> around. im guessing we not allowed to have Capcom characters in the logo?
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:10:56 +0000
>>  If you’re not using set bracers, then there are better options – at
>> higher levels, Ancient Parthan defenders are amazing for Monk and Barb. Hit
>> a group and have reduced damage by 50%.
>>
>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 9:01 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>  ive seen players use that shrine bracer , so that when they do get a
>> shrine then elites spawn. which is cool because it reduces your time to go
>> search for elites.
>>
>> the only drawback is that the shrine bracers are ass.
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:50:23 +0000
>>  I’m guessing you mean for solo runs? Party play is a different thing.
>>
>> Tier list is something like this:
>> 1.       DH
>> 2.       Monk
>> 3.       WD/Wiz
>> 4.       Cru
>> 5.       Barb
>>
>> The GR rankings are skewed by the old conduit farming (and outright
>> cheating) players.
>>
>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 8:47 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>  I want to see if a similar build to the wizard's cm build pre ros patch
>> is possible.
>>
>> that was the most OP build in all D3 eva.
>>
>> where is the wizard in terms of tiers among the classes? im guessing he
>> is very poo poo tier.
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>  From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:44:07 +0000
>>  Pull is better than stun.
>>
>>  It essentially does both
>>  ------------------------------
>>  From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:35:28 +0000
>>  ya I saw that but I they haven't done stun as well. only dashing strike
>> and palm whole day.
>>
>> I thought mirane is outdated now? do people still use it? coz out of all
>> my gems that's probably the highest.
>>
>> anyways, I don't think I can get passed 30 grifts comfortably anymore.
>>
>> most of my gem levelling came from previous patch holy monk build.
>> haven't come close to grfit 35 yet.
>>
>> all of my dmg came from the FD I used when sunwuko gave us the 20% dmg
>> buff. now that they've changed that , I don't use 2h's anymore. 1h's ftw.
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>  From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:29:44 +0000
>>  CDR Perma serenity pull/palm monk is probably one of the strongest
>> builds in the game.
>>  ------------------------------
>>  From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:51:36 +0000
>>  im using taeguk with gogons swift.
>>
>> both are level 35.
>>
>> haven't tried a rift with new build yet. just been farming better rrog's.
>>
>> rings are nothing special, I use it for the cdr. that's why I need a
>> better rrog. getting that balance just right with dmg and cdr is going to
>> be a mission.
>>
>> ultimately what im going for is to be in permanent lighting epiphany and
>> perma serenity. then use stun rune. therefore I can go into a fight , and
>> stun everyone around me then the team can just pick them off one at a time.
>> I haven't seen anyone attempt this build yet.
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:45:01 +0000
>>  That’s the major problem with barbs as well. I can get to a rift boss
>> with 8 or 9 minutes remaining, but not kill him.
>>
>> What level rift are you running? Also what rings and gems (checking the
>> character link takes too long with my dodgy vpn here).
>>
>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 7:42 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>  morning peeps,
>>
>> ugh I seem to be having a problem.
>>
>> im able to dispatch mobs quite easily due to fist of azteraq (exploding
>> palm deal 80% more dmg)
>>
>> problem now im getting is single target dps. it takes too long to kill 1
>> thing on its own. kuk game
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:10:24 +0000
>>  If you need tips on magical schoolgirls, Paas is your man.
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel
>> *Sent:* 17 February 2015 11:16 PM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>  You're gonna have to ask Di about the chibi stuff he's good with that.
>>
>>  I've always thought about a fg based on the paths of darkness books.
>>
>> ​
>>
>>  On 17 February 2015 at 22:02, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> *lol* That's frightfully ambitious :P
>> My beat-em-up idea was actually inspired by a little known GBA game
>> featuring Tiny Toons characters. The game is forgettable but the concept is
>> great. It's a standard beat-em-up at it's core, but with one fundamental
>> difference: Assist characters *lol*
>> You select a partner from a list of available characters. Each character
>> has a special ability that allows you to extend combos or deal with
>> multiple enemies. I want to expand on that in a creative way.
>> My games will feature ninjas, unsurprisingly :P Chibi female ninjas, to
>> be exact.
>>  On 17 Feb 2015 21:52, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I want to make a side scrolling beat em up in the graphic style of Guilty
>> Gear, the same graphic generating capability of No Man's Sky, the character
>> edit functionality of a chinese mmo and the ability to be able to edit
>> every character's movelist with all the attacks of the last 10years worth
>> of fighting games.
>> Oh, and I want it to be cross platform, and have the custom created
>> characters to be dlc bosses in other peoples versions of the game.
>> Can it do that?
>>  On 17 Feb 2015 21:47, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>   If you want to make games, jump straight into Game Maker Studio.  The
>> standard edition is free.
>>
>> https://www.yoyogames.com/studio
>>  You'll be making games and learning to program at the same time,
>> without the hassle of learning the technical stuff.  Plus there's loads of
>> tutorials.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vdfs08TyH-U
>>  And of course you can make much more complex stuff.
>>
>> http://sandbox.yoyogames.com/browse?sort=top-rated
>>
>>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  I've just taken it up as a hobby for now *lol* I've had this idea for a
>> game that I'd like to work on once I've improved my knowledge and
>> proficiency somewhat, but that's still far off. Right now I'm comfortable
>> just getting to grips with the basics.
>>
>>  The lessons haven't covered looping or arrays yet but I suppose that
>> bridge will be crossed eventually :P I've been learning about strings,
>> boolean, if/else statements, variables, functions, etc. It's been an
>> interesting journey thus far :)
>>
>>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:50 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Awesome news on programming bro :] It's a pretty rewarding field if you
>> stick with it. It can be hard to wrap your head around some of the initial
>> concepts but like anything it tends to get easier with time.
>>
>>  Have you done any form of looping yet? Or arrays? They're probably some
>> of the trickier initial concepts if you're starting out.
>>
>>  An example of a simple but effective exercise would be to try and write
>> a function that takes an input and checks whether it's a palindrome, i.e
>> whether it reads the same forward of backwards, i.e. bob or level.
>> Sometimes just writing down instructions (pseudocode) as you mentioned is
>> helpful in starting out with some form of answer.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  I'm starting to learn how important that is *lol*. Giving good
>> instructions.
>>
>>  One of the lessons was to create a "Rock, Paper, Scissors" game. It's
>> amazing just how much goes into something so simple (randomisation,
>> ensuring that all possible options and decisions are accounted for, etc.).
>> If there's even one thing that's out of place, everything else falls apart.
>> I have a newfound respect for coders.
>>
>>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Programming is all about giving good instructions.  If you can give
>> good instructions, you can be a good programmer.
>>
>>  The hard part is functional programming because we don't tend to
>> procedurally, not functionally.  And asynchronous programming can be
>> tricky, even though in the real world it's a breeze to handle and
>> understand because we do everything asynchronously.
>>
>>  The cool thing about Javascript is that you can use it to learn
>> functional and procedural techniques.
>>
>>
>>
>>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Well I'm enjoying it so far. I suppose that's the important thing.
>> Troubleshooting = problem solving = I have a knack.
>>
>>  I hate maths though.
>>
>>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  You need a knack for problem solving. It can be a lot of fun. From time
>> to time I will review models and try to track down issues – could be lousy
>> macros, poor maths or just bad model governance. That’s more my style than
>> straight programming.
>> Good luck with it all. I suppose just keep at it.
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>> *Sent:* 17 February 2015 3:16 PM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>  I've always felt that I don't have a mind for programming, so I'm
>> trying to see if I'm wrong.
>>
>>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Did a couple of years of comp sci at varsity. Quit when I realised it was
>> nothing like gaming.
>>
>> Sent from my Windows Phone
>> ________________________________
>> From: Ryan Williams<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: ‎2015-‎02-‎17 14:54
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>
>> In my experience, the first few lessons were simple enough to grasp. Shit
>> gets real after that. Currently learning functions.
>>
>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:51, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> f I stopped somewhere at the beginning , writing my name or something.
>>
>> kuk is hard.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:49:54 +0200
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>> Yar. Learning Javascript.
>>
>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:49, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> code academy?
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:48:18 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>> End of the month.
>>
>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:47, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> So no Kamimodo this week?
>> :(
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm learning how to code.
>>
>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:45, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> 1...2....3....4....
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:43:44 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Tumbooroo weedo
>>
>> On 17 February 2015 at 13:07, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> :(
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:01:32 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>>
>> @paas
>> I see you cannot use the PSN+ Guilty Gear colours on the ps3 version.
>> Bummer.
>>
>> I-no's looks the best tho.
>>
>> On 17 Feb 2015 11:14, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> Egh i stuck running meters and meters of vinyl through a machine today.
>> Pretty boring but at least I'm near a pc most of the time.
>>
>> On 17 February 2015 at 11:10, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> [cid:ii_i692juxm0_14b96cde4c77c2f7]
>> ​
>>
>> On 17 February 2015 at 11:00, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> Are you really happy with a win....
>>
>> YES
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:58:03 +0000
>>
>>
>> Are you really happy with a win where it was the lag that gave it to you,
>> not your skill?
>>
>> Yawn. Having trouble staying awake here.
>>
>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>> On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
>> Sent: 17 February 2015 10:50 AM
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>> winnings winning
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:42:48 +0200
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> *lol* You mean like me winning all those matches last night? :P
>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:39, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> [cid:image001.png@01D04AA0.930D4E90 <https://01D04AA0.930D4E90>]
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:33:07 +0200
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> You call winning once with 16f delay bopping? The fark outta here. You'll
>> know what real bopping is on Saturday.
>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:30, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> wtf!!!!!!!
>>
>> sap didn't I bop you last nyt?
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:29:35 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> *lol*
>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:26, "euraima tobias" <euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>> euraima@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> Is it GB's? I knew something was up, letting him bop you like that in
>> melty... :-?
>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:21 AM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> I didn't know you were expecting LB.  Congrats.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:58 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> u violet my expectancy
>>
>> now im mad
>>
>> let the bopping commence
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:56:31 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> He's not unsure, he's in denial.
>> On 17 Feb 2015 09:55, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> > im unsure whats happening.
>> LB's epitaph
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:50 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> they probably related to "the answer" somehow.
>>
>> also I would like closure on the topic of jeeva or kami this week?
>>
>> im unsure whats happening.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:31:07 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> You have to assume that they can hack basically anything since they've
>> obtained source code to hardware firmware.  These hacks go way back to
>> 2001.  Noone knows what they're capable of now.  And you still have to
>> consider the capabilities of Russia, China, Europe and Israel.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> Can dey hek my iped?
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> Interesting material for people who like reading about hacking and spy
>> programs:
>>
>>
>> https://securelist.com/files/2015/02/Equation_group_questions_and_answers.pdf
>> tl;dr:  The NSA has an elite hacking group nicknamed "Equation" that,
>> among other things, has managed to create spyware that infects PC hard
>> drive firmware and can operate undetected.
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> **********************************************************************
>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member
>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------
>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   ------------------------------
>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>   ------------------------------
>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>        ------------------------------
>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>   ------------------------------
>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>   ------------------------------
>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------
>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------
>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>

JPEG image

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2015