Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:42:59 +0200

Not random. Playstyle.

Eg. I like to throw a lot. A new player who i've not played against or met
vs me. I win vs him because he got thrown to death. He gets mad because
he's actually a better player than me but didn't expect me to throw that
much. Is that random? is that the game's fault?

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Indeed
>
> Its also why I despise the 2d fighter ft2 thing...  it takes a game or
> 2(or more) for me to sometimes adjust to a players random bullshit.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:36:46 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> You probably did better in that round then. Me eating db+3 constantly is
> my fault. But you didn't win from purely Paul's d+1+2 going through stuff.
>
> I know the command list but not you're playstyle...Sometimes my playstyle
> just loses to yours if i'm not prepared or refuse to learn fast enough. But
> it's nothing to do with the game system and mechanic.
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  I’m not basing my argument on an example. I’m using an example to
> highlight my argument. Don’t get confused between the two.
>
>
>
> What we had there was a perfect example of the issue I have with TTT2. You
> are a better player than me. You also know the characters I was playing.
> What happened? You lost.
>
> Is this a constant thing? No. Does this happen every time we play? No.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 3:24 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> You're basing your argument from 1~3 game?
>
>
>
> I lost because i kept eating your db+3 AK. That was my fault. Not the game.
>
>
>
> I fail to see this TTT2 random ass game argument you're trying to say.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Do you recall the last time you and I played, Di? I won. Do you know why
> I won? Is it because I’m a better Tekken player than you? No. Is it because
> you don’t know Paul or AK? No.
>
> It’s because TTT2 is a random ass game.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 3:15 PM
>
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> I'm faced with random joes who only started the game and decides to play
> characters i have 0 idea about at the time (aka Hwoarang, Baek, Raven, etc)
> at the arcade all the time. I don't lose to them. All the top players don't
> lose to them. Sure maybe a round out of 3 but then we adapt and destroy
> them. If you're losing to "random" aka new characters and moves...it's
> definitely not the game's fault. It's yours...
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  And what mechanic is that in TTT2?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  I suppose it’s more a case then of people playing Tekken because there
> wasn’t anything else. Once choice popped up, people didn’t bother with it.
> I suppose that’s a different thing then – they didn’t find the game as fun
> as other fighting games, opposed to not finding it as fun as previous
> incarnations. Still doesn’t
>
>
>
> Oh, and if a game’s mechanic lends itself to allowing random joes to win
> against people who’ve put in more time practicing, then yes, it is the
> game’s fault.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 3:00 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> And that's the game fault? You lost to a random joe is entirely your fault
> because you don't know how to fight an alisa, capo, whatever?
>
>
>
> I don't know why it's not as popular in Cape Town. But from the mails,
> it's simply they were interested in other games and Tekken wasn't their
> first choice anyways. T6BR was probably more popular in CT because it
> didn't have a lot of competitors in the fighting game industry when it came
> out. I don't see anyone say it isn't much fun as BR or anything like that.
> I think it's the same for the west. More options for fighting games.
> Nothing to do with TTT2 being ass.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  That’s a bit of a massive generalisation there. Every top player loved
> the game? The game died in the West because Eastern players were better at
> it? I don’t know about that. I think  TTT2 failed in the West because
> people in the West don’t like the game. It’s that simple.
>
> Why do you think people in Cape Town didn’t play it much? It is because we
> were upset about the nerfs to Bob, or the skill gap between us and Koreans?
> No, it’s because the game just wasn’t as much fun as the previous ones.
>
> People weren’t put off by the fact that they would dump a massive amount
> of time into the game and then get bopped by Knee. They were upset that a
> random joe off the street who’d been playing the game for 3 months, would
> rock up and random his way to a win.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 2:35 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> Because the west couldn't compete with the east. Every top player loved
> TTT2 because it's the most balanced tekken out there. Sure there's some
> crazy stuff like Capo's b+1,4 but top player don't see an issue. They
> barely eat that CH. Those who eat b+1,4 are just spamming mindlessly and
> deserve to be punished with that.
>
>
>
> I don't think TTT2 died because the game sucked. T6BR was already
> suffering with the release of so many new fighting games. TTT2 also have a
> higher learning curve than the generic BR where the west just spams one
> move until they win. TTT2 you can't do that...TTT2 really showed who are
> the top players and who are not. Simply because SS got better, spammable
> moves don't exist. So the west quit. Bob can't spam d+1 until he wins...all
> his other shit is getting SS'd or SW'd. Way to solve that? learn to SS and
> SW...but they play Bob like a 2D game. Master backdash and forward
> dash...which is good for footsies but Tekken rewards SS and SW a lot too.
>
>
>
> TTT2 came out late in the west too. That also contribute the skill gap
> between the west and the east. Why would the west play a game where they
> have little to no chance of winning in events when JDCR, Knee shows up? So
> they get put off by the fact they will spend time and money and get nothing
> in return.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  They’re changing the game. I’m a little surprised considering how much
> people in the East loved TTT2.
>
>
>
> In the West, it tanked. People hated the game. It barely made it to Evo
> and then only because some people complained. Hell, let’s stop and look at
> Cape Town and the people who play Tekken and are on the emails here. That
> would be you, me, Paas, Steve, Lumi, Manase, Sap, Kahn, Shraf... Richard as
> well, but I didn’t play much against him in the previous game.
>
> Who of those on the list actually played much TTT2? I mean compared to T6
> or T5. For those of you who actually played a lot of the old ones – Sap,
> Lumi and Manase specifically – how much did you enjoy TTT2 and how much of
> it did you play?
>
>
>
> I see a lot of huge changes to T7 and a lot of bitching about how they’re
> catering to noobs and how the top players won’t put up with it. I’m not
> overly concerned about it. Tekken in the West, and here in Cape Town, died
> with TTT2. If they don’t something to massively change that, what is the
> point?
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 1:58 PM
>
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> Also f+1+3 and f+2+4 are used as homing moves because it tracks all sides.
>
>
>
> So normal throws are extremely useful.
>
>
>
> First they dumb down the wake ups and oki...now throws? they're really
> trying to appeal to noobs and new player more than top players...since top
> players will eventually quit anyways...#fucklogic...
>
>
>
> Rage art is useless. None of the top player are eating it at all lolz.
> Unless Rage Arts can be used in between strings...i don't see much use for
> it at all. Power Crush is interesting but doesn't seem too out of the
> ordinary.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  I use A LOT of normal throws. Some character's normal throws are part of
> their game since it puts them on decent oki wake ups.
>
>
>
> Me not breaking throws has nothing to do with making throws easier to
> break. I'm not complaining about me not breaking throws...i'm complaining
> the fact they made 1+3 and 2+4 throws completely useless. 1+3 2+4 throws
> plays a big part in top level. You sidestep and throw and try to block the
> throw animation with your movement and position. Making it even harder to
> see what throws you did. Now? fuck, useless...1+2 throws are used in
> different situation. They are usually used for their small throw break
> window.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  And that from the guy who can’t break throws. Will this actually make
> any difference? Who uses normal throws?
>
> The only time I get a normal 1+3/2+4 throw with Paul is by accident. Most
> characters have special throws with 1,2 and 1+2 breaks, so what’s the issue?
>
> I do use the normal throws with King, but I suppose I shouldn’t.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 12:08 PM
>
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
>
> http://www.avoidingthepuddle.com/news/2015/2/17/tekken-7-all-13-and-24-throws-can-be-broken-with-either-1-or.html
>
>
>
> I hope this isn't true...otherwise, it's going to make the game suck.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Lili's hair looks nice :)
>
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoAeIOXYRHw
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mw-EYlDoeA4
>
>
>
> Oh shit! Dragunov Sweep = Full combo now :D
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:55 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  lol u not ryt
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:53:53 +0000
>
>
>  Why not? What are they going to do, sue some random FGC in CT? If they
> do send a cease and desist letter, it will be good publicity.
>
>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 9:48 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>  im really excited about Saturday. SAP has some evil plans for us.
>
> main thing im concerned about is getting dat publicity out.
>
> im imaging an overlay with kamimodo and cts logo. with facebook kuk
> around. im guessing we not allowed to have Capcom characters in the logo?
>
>  ------------------------------
>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:10:56 +0000
>  If you’re not using set bracers, then there are better options – at
> higher levels, Ancient Parthan defenders are amazing for Monk and Barb. Hit
> a group and have reduced damage by 50%.
>
>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 9:01 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>  ive seen players use that shrine bracer , so that when they do get a
> shrine then elites spawn. which is cool because it reduces your time to go
> search for elites.
>
> the only drawback is that the shrine bracers are ass.
>
>  ------------------------------
>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:50:23 +0000
>  I’m guessing you mean for solo runs? Party play is a different thing.
>
> Tier list is something like this:
> 1.       DH
> 2.       Monk
> 3.       WD/Wiz
> 4.       Cru
> 5.       Barb
>
> The GR rankings are skewed by the old conduit farming (and outright
> cheating) players.
>
>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 8:47 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>  I want to see if a similar build to the wizard's cm build pre ros patch
> is possible.
>
> that was the most OP build in all D3 eva.
>
> where is the wizard in terms of tiers among the classes? im guessing he is
> very poo poo tier.
>
>  ------------------------------
>  From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:44:07 +0000
>  Pull is better than stun.
>
>  It essentially does both
>  ------------------------------
>  From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:35:28 +0000
>  ya I saw that but I they haven't done stun as well. only dashing strike
> and palm whole day.
>
> I thought mirane is outdated now? do people still use it? coz out of all
> my gems that's probably the highest.
>
> anyways, I don't think I can get passed 30 grifts comfortably anymore.
>
> most of my gem levelling came from previous patch holy monk build. haven't
> come close to grfit 35 yet.
>
> all of my dmg came from the FD I used when sunwuko gave us the 20% dmg
> buff. now that they've changed that , I don't use 2h's anymore. 1h's ftw.
>
>  ------------------------------
>  From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:29:44 +0000
>  CDR Perma serenity pull/palm monk is probably one of the strongest
> builds in the game.
>  ------------------------------
>  From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:51:36 +0000
>  im using taeguk with gogons swift.
>
> both are level 35.
>
> haven't tried a rift with new build yet. just been farming better rrog's.
>
> rings are nothing special, I use it for the cdr. that's why I need a
> better rrog. getting that balance just right with dmg and cdr is going to
> be a mission.
>
> ultimately what im going for is to be in permanent lighting epiphany and
> perma serenity. then use stun rune. therefore I can go into a fight , and
> stun everyone around me then the team can just pick them off one at a time.
> I haven't seen anyone attempt this build yet.
>
>  ------------------------------
>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:45:01 +0000
>  That’s the major problem with barbs as well. I can get to a rift boss
> with 8 or 9 minutes remaining, but not kill him.
>
> What level rift are you running? Also what rings and gems (checking the
> character link takes too long with my dodgy vpn here).
>
>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 7:42 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>  morning peeps,
>
> ugh I seem to be having a problem.
>
> im able to dispatch mobs quite easily due to fist of azteraq (exploding
> palm deal 80% more dmg)
>
> problem now im getting is single target dps. it takes too long to kill 1
> thing on its own. kuk game
>
>  ------------------------------
>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:10:24 +0000
>  If you need tips on magical schoolgirls, Paas is your man.
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel
> *Sent:* 17 February 2015 11:16 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>  You're gonna have to ask Di about the chibi stuff he's good with that.
>
>  I've always thought about a fg based on the paths of darkness books.
>
> ​
>
>  On 17 February 2015 at 22:02, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> *lol* That's frightfully ambitious :P
> My beat-em-up idea was actually inspired by a little known GBA game
> featuring Tiny Toons characters. The game is forgettable but the concept is
> great. It's a standard beat-em-up at it's core, but with one fundamental
> difference: Assist characters *lol*
> You select a partner from a list of available characters. Each character
> has a special ability that allows you to extend combos or deal with
> multiple enemies. I want to expand on that in a creative way.
> My games will feature ninjas, unsurprisingly :P Chibi female ninjas, to be
> exact.
>  On 17 Feb 2015 21:52, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I want to make a side scrolling beat em up in the graphic style of Guilty
> Gear, the same graphic generating capability of No Man's Sky, the character
> edit functionality of a chinese mmo and the ability to be able to edit
> every character's movelist with all the attacks of the last 10years worth
> of fighting games.
> Oh, and I want it to be cross platform, and have the custom created
> characters to be dlc bosses in other peoples versions of the game.
> Can it do that?
>  On 17 Feb 2015 21:47, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   If you want to make games, jump straight into Game Maker Studio.  The
> standard edition is free.
>
> https://www.yoyogames.com/studio
>  You'll be making games and learning to program at the same time, without
> the hassle of learning the technical stuff.  Plus there's loads of
> tutorials.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vdfs08TyH-U
>  And of course you can make much more complex stuff.
>
> http://sandbox.yoyogames.com/browse?sort=top-rated
>
>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  I've just taken it up as a hobby for now *lol* I've had this idea for a
> game that I'd like to work on once I've improved my knowledge and
> proficiency somewhat, but that's still far off. Right now I'm comfortable
> just getting to grips with the basics.
>
>  The lessons haven't covered looping or arrays yet but I suppose that
> bridge will be crossed eventually :P I've been learning about strings,
> boolean, if/else statements, variables, functions, etc. It's been an
> interesting journey thus far :)
>
>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:50 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Awesome news on programming bro :] It's a pretty rewarding field if you
> stick with it. It can be hard to wrap your head around some of the initial
> concepts but like anything it tends to get easier with time.
>
>  Have you done any form of looping yet? Or arrays? They're probably some
> of the trickier initial concepts if you're starting out.
>
>  An example of a simple but effective exercise would be to try and write
> a function that takes an input and checks whether it's a palindrome, i.e
> whether it reads the same forward of backwards, i.e. bob or level.
> Sometimes just writing down instructions (pseudocode) as you mentioned is
> helpful in starting out with some form of answer.
>
>
>
>
>
>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  I'm starting to learn how important that is *lol*. Giving good
> instructions.
>
>  One of the lessons was to create a "Rock, Paper, Scissors" game. It's
> amazing just how much goes into something so simple (randomisation,
> ensuring that all possible options and decisions are accounted for, etc.).
> If there's even one thing that's out of place, everything else falls apart.
> I have a newfound respect for coders.
>
>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Programming is all about giving good instructions.  If you can give good
> instructions, you can be a good programmer.
>
>  The hard part is functional programming because we don't tend to
> procedurally, not functionally.  And asynchronous programming can be
> tricky, even though in the real world it's a breeze to handle and
> understand because we do everything asynchronously.
>
>  The cool thing about Javascript is that you can use it to learn
> functional and procedural techniques.
>
>
>
>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Well I'm enjoying it so far. I suppose that's the important thing.
> Troubleshooting = problem solving = I have a knack.
>
>  I hate maths though.
>
>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  You need a knack for problem solving. It can be a lot of fun. From time
> to time I will review models and try to track down issues – could be lousy
> macros, poor maths or just bad model governance. That’s more my style than
> straight programming.
> Good luck with it all. I suppose just keep at it.
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> *Sent:* 17 February 2015 3:16 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>  I've always felt that I don't have a mind for programming, so I'm trying
> to see if I'm wrong.
>
>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Did a couple of years of comp sci at varsity. Quit when I realised it was
> nothing like gaming.
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ________________________________
> From: Ryan Williams<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: ‎2015-‎02-‎17 14:54
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
> In my experience, the first few lessons were simple enough to grasp. Shit
> gets real after that. Currently learning functions.
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 14:51, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> f I stopped somewhere at the beginning , writing my name or something.
>
> kuk is hard.
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:49:54 +0200
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Yar. Learning Javascript.
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 14:49, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> code academy?
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:48:18 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> End of the month.
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 14:47, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> So no Kamimodo this week?
> :(
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> I'm learning how to code.
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 14:45, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 1...2....3....4....
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:43:44 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Tumbooroo weedo
>
> On 17 February 2015 at 13:07, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> :(
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:01:32 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> @paas
> I see you cannot use the PSN+ Guilty Gear colours on the ps3 version.
> Bummer.
>
> I-no's looks the best tho.
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 11:14, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Egh i stuck running meters and meters of vinyl through a machine today.
> Pretty boring but at least I'm near a pc most of the time.
>
> On 17 February 2015 at 11:10, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> [cid:ii_i692juxm0_14b96cde4c77c2f7]
> ​
>
> On 17 February 2015 at 11:00, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Are you really happy with a win....
>
> YES
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:58:03 +0000
>
>
> Are you really happy with a win where it was the lag that gave it to you,
> not your skill?
>
> Yawn. Having trouble staying awake here.
>
> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
> Sent: 17 February 2015 10:50 AM
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
> winnings winning
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:42:48 +0200
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *lol* You mean like me winning all those matches last night? :P
> On 17 Feb 2015 10:39, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>
> [cid:image001.png@01D04AA0.930D4E90 <https://01D04AA0.930D4E90>]
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:33:07 +0200
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> You call winning once with 16f delay bopping? The fark outta here. You'll
> know what real bopping is on Saturday.
> On 17 Feb 2015 10:30, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> wtf!!!!!!!
>
> sap didn't I bop you last nyt?
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:29:35 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *lol*
> On 17 Feb 2015 10:26, "euraima tobias" <euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> euraima@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Is it GB's? I knew something was up, letting him bop you like that in
> melty... :-?
> On 17 Feb 2015 10:21 AM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> I didn't know you were expecting LB.  Congrats.
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:58 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> u violet my expectancy
>
> now im mad
>
> let the bopping commence
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:56:31 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> He's not unsure, he's in denial.
> On 17 Feb 2015 09:55, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> > im unsure whats happening.
> LB's epitaph
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:50 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> they probably related to "the answer" somehow.
>
> also I would like closure on the topic of jeeva or kami this week?
>
> im unsure whats happening.
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:31:07 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> You have to assume that they can hack basically anything since they've
> obtained source code to hardware firmware.  These hacks go way back to
> 2001.  Noone knows what they're capable of now.  And you still have to
> consider the capabilities of Russia, China, Europe and Israel.
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Can dey hek my iped?
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Interesting material for people who like reading about hacking and spy
> programs:
>
>
> https://securelist.com/files/2015/02/Equation_group_questions_and_answers.pdf
> tl;dr:  The NSA has an elite hacking group nicknamed "Equation" that,
> among other things, has managed to create spyware that infects PC hard
> drive firmware and can operate undetected.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member
> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>     ------------------------------
>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>   ------------------------------
>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>        ------------------------------
>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>   ------------------------------
>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>   ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>       ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>      ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>    ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>

JPEG image

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2015