Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:26:07 +0200

I didn't even know they reduced the sidestepping again. Way to go Namco.
On 18 Feb 2015 15:22, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> DR was balanced and good. Eddy's d+4 was the best thing ever.
>
> T6~TTT2 combo damage is harsh compare to T5DR. It became less pokes and
> spacing and more combo damage.
>
> I like how they removed B! out of T7. It's one of the positive changes
> they made. This makes it fair to characters who can wall carry and still do
> 20hits wall combo because of B! (Nina...) With the T! they still kept some
> of the element of T6 no wall bound combo but removed the whole wall B!
> combo madness that came along with some characters...
>
> T7 combo damage scaling seems to be better too. So hopefully it's more
> like DR poking game. They however, reduced the sidestepping again...sad.
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> That's complete bullshit.
>>
>> T5DR was a solid Tekken game. If you want to talk about a game that
>> rewarded time put in and had a well-balanced cast, that was it. You were
>> rewarded for good movement and spacing, and the game ultimately felt less
>> about combos than it did about pokes and mixups.
>>
>> I can't speak for anyone else but l loved that game; not because l had no
>> choice but because it was immensely fun and rewarding to play. It was the
>> last Tekken game l thoroughly enjoyed playing.
>>
>> If T6 had been anything like DR, I probably would have spent more time
>> with it.
>> On 18 Feb 2015 15:03, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> that's true that paas wrote.
>>>
>>> t5dr was cool coz we had no choice but to like it.
>>>
>>> then sf4 came , then marvel then kof, it just snowballed away from
>>> tekken.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:59:34 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>> And that's the game fault? You lost to a random joe is entirely your
>>> fault because you don't know how to fight an alisa, capo, whatever?
>>>
>>> I don't know why it's not as popular in Cape Town. But from the mails,
>>> it's simply they were interested in other games and Tekken wasn't their
>>> first choice anyways. T6BR was probably more popular in CT because it
>>> didn't have a lot of competitors in the fighting game industry when it came
>>> out. I don't see anyone say it isn't much fun as BR or anything like that.
>>> I think it's the same for the west. More options for fighting games.
>>> Nothing to do with TTT2 being ass.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  That’s a bit of a massive generalisation there. Every top player loved
>>> the game? The game died in the West because Eastern players were better at
>>> it? I don’t know about that. I think  TTT2 failed in the West because
>>> people in the West don’t like the game. It’s that simple.
>>>
>>> Why do you think people in Cape Town didn’t play it much? It is because
>>> we were upset about the nerfs to Bob, or the skill gap between us and
>>> Koreans? No, it’s because the game just wasn’t as much fun as the previous
>>> ones.
>>>
>>> People weren’t put off by the fact that they would dump a massive amount
>>> of time into the game and then get bopped by Knee. They were upset that a
>>> random joe off the street who’d been playing the game for 3 months, would
>>> rock up and random his way to a win.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 2:35 PM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Because the west couldn't compete with the east. Every top player loved
>>> TTT2 because it's the most balanced tekken out there. Sure there's some
>>> crazy stuff like Capo's b+1,4 but top player don't see an issue. They
>>> barely eat that CH. Those who eat b+1,4 are just spamming mindlessly and
>>> deserve to be punished with that.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't think TTT2 died because the game sucked. T6BR was already
>>> suffering with the release of so many new fighting games. TTT2 also have a
>>> higher learning curve than the generic BR where the west just spams one
>>> move until they win. TTT2 you can't do that...TTT2 really showed who are
>>> the top players and who are not. Simply because SS got better, spammable
>>> moves don't exist. So the west quit. Bob can't spam d+1 until he wins...all
>>> his other shit is getting SS'd or SW'd. Way to solve that? learn to SS and
>>> SW...but they play Bob like a 2D game. Master backdash and forward
>>> dash...which is good for footsies but Tekken rewards SS and SW a lot too.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> TTT2 came out late in the west too. That also contribute the skill gap
>>> between the west and the east. Why would the west play a game where they
>>> have little to no chance of winning in events when JDCR, Knee shows up? So
>>> they get put off by the fact they will spend time and money and get nothing
>>> in return.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  They’re changing the game. I’m a little surprised considering how much
>>> people in the East loved TTT2.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In the West, it tanked. People hated the game. It barely made it to Evo
>>> and then only because some people complained. Hell, let’s stop and look at
>>> Cape Town and the people who play Tekken and are on the emails here. That
>>> would be you, me, Paas, Steve, Lumi, Manase, Sap, Kahn, Shraf... Richard as
>>> well, but I didn’t play much against him in the previous game.
>>>
>>> Who of those on the list actually played much TTT2? I mean compared to
>>> T6 or T5. For those of you who actually played a lot of the old ones – Sap,
>>> Lumi and Manase specifically – how much did you enjoy TTT2 and how much of
>>> it did you play?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I see a lot of huge changes to T7 and a lot of bitching about how
>>> they’re catering to noobs and how the top players won’t put up with it. I’m
>>> not overly concerned about it. Tekken in the West, and here in Cape Town,
>>> died with TTT2. If they don’t something to massively change that, what is
>>> the point?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 1:58 PM
>>>
>>>
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Also f+1+3 and f+2+4 are used as homing moves because it tracks all
>>> sides.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So normal throws are extremely useful.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> First they dumb down the wake ups and oki...now throws? they're really
>>> trying to appeal to noobs and new player more than top players...since top
>>> players will eventually quit anyways...#fucklogic...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rage art is useless. None of the top player are eating it at all lolz.
>>> Unless Rage Arts can be used in between strings...i don't see much use for
>>> it at all. Power Crush is interesting but doesn't seem too out of the
>>> ordinary.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  I use A LOT of normal throws. Some character's normal throws are part
>>> of their game since it puts them on decent oki wake ups.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Me not breaking throws has nothing to do with making throws easier to
>>> break. I'm not complaining about me not breaking throws...i'm complaining
>>> the fact they made 1+3 and 2+4 throws completely useless. 1+3 2+4 throws
>>> plays a big part in top level. You sidestep and throw and try to block the
>>> throw animation with your movement and position. Making it even harder to
>>> see what throws you did. Now? fuck, useless...1+2 throws are used in
>>> different situation. They are usually used for their small throw break
>>> window.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  And that from the guy who can’t break throws. Will this actually make
>>> any difference? Who uses normal throws?
>>>
>>> The only time I get a normal 1+3/2+4 throw with Paul is by accident.
>>> Most characters have special throws with 1,2 and 1+2 breaks, so what’s the
>>> issue?
>>>
>>> I do use the normal throws with King, but I suppose I shouldn’t.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 12:08 PM
>>>
>>>
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.avoidingthepuddle.com/news/2015/2/17/tekken-7-all-13-and-24-throws-can-be-broken-with-either-1-or.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I hope this isn't true...otherwise, it's going to make the game suck.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Lili's hair looks nice :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoAeIOXYRHw
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mw-EYlDoeA4
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh shit! Dragunov Sweep = Full combo now :D
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:55 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  lol u not ryt
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>
>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:53:53 +0000
>>>
>>>
>>>  Why not? What are they going to do, sue some random FGC in CT? If they
>>> do send a cease and desist letter, it will be good publicity.
>>>
>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 9:48 AM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>  im really excited about Saturday. SAP has some evil plans for us.
>>>
>>> main thing im concerned about is getting dat publicity out.
>>>
>>> im imaging an overlay with kamimodo and cts logo. with facebook kuk
>>> around. im guessing we not allowed to have Capcom characters in the logo?
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:10:56 +0000
>>>  If you’re not using set bracers, then there are better options – at
>>> higher levels, Ancient Parthan defenders are amazing for Monk and Barb. Hit
>>> a group and have reduced damage by 50%.
>>>
>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 9:01 AM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>  ive seen players use that shrine bracer , so that when they do get a
>>> shrine then elites spawn. which is cool because it reduces your time to go
>>> search for elites.
>>>
>>> the only drawback is that the shrine bracers are ass.
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:50:23 +0000
>>>  I’m guessing you mean for solo runs? Party play is a different thing.
>>>
>>> Tier list is something like this:
>>> 1.       DH
>>> 2.       Monk
>>> 3.       WD/Wiz
>>> 4.       Cru
>>> 5.       Barb
>>>
>>> The GR rankings are skewed by the old conduit farming (and outright
>>> cheating) players.
>>>
>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 8:47 AM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>  I want to see if a similar build to the wizard's cm build pre ros
>>> patch is possible.
>>>
>>> that was the most OP build in all D3 eva.
>>>
>>> where is the wizard in terms of tiers among the classes? im guessing he
>>> is very poo poo tier.
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>  From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:44:07 +0000
>>>  Pull is better than stun.
>>>
>>>  It essentially does both
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>  From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:35:28 +0000
>>>  ya I saw that but I they haven't done stun as well. only dashing
>>> strike and palm whole day.
>>>
>>> I thought mirane is outdated now? do people still use it? coz out of all
>>> my gems that's probably the highest.
>>>
>>> anyways, I don't think I can get passed 30 grifts comfortably anymore.
>>>
>>> most of my gem levelling came from previous patch holy monk build.
>>> haven't come close to grfit 35 yet.
>>>
>>> all of my dmg came from the FD I used when sunwuko gave us the 20% dmg
>>> buff. now that they've changed that , I don't use 2h's anymore. 1h's ftw.
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>  From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:29:44 +0000
>>>  CDR Perma serenity pull/palm monk is probably one of the strongest
>>> builds in the game.
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>  From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:51:36 +0000
>>>  im using taeguk with gogons swift.
>>>
>>> both are level 35.
>>>
>>> haven't tried a rift with new build yet. just been farming better rrog's.
>>>
>>> rings are nothing special, I use it for the cdr. that's why I need a
>>> better rrog. getting that balance just right with dmg and cdr is going to
>>> be a mission.
>>>
>>> ultimately what im going for is to be in permanent lighting epiphany and
>>> perma serenity. then use stun rune. therefore I can go into a fight , and
>>> stun everyone around me then the team can just pick them off one at a time.
>>> I haven't seen anyone attempt this build yet.
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:45:01 +0000
>>>  That’s the major problem with barbs as well. I can get to a rift boss
>>> with 8 or 9 minutes remaining, but not kill him.
>>>
>>> What level rift are you running? Also what rings and gems (checking the
>>> character link takes too long with my dodgy vpn here).
>>>
>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 7:42 AM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>  morning peeps,
>>>
>>> ugh I seem to be having a problem.
>>>
>>> im able to dispatch mobs quite easily due to fist of azteraq (exploding
>>> palm deal 80% more dmg)
>>>
>>> problem now im getting is single target dps. it takes too long to kill 1
>>> thing on its own. kuk game
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:10:24 +0000
>>>  If you need tips on magical schoolgirls, Paas is your man.
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel
>>> *Sent:* 17 February 2015 11:16 PM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>  You're gonna have to ask Di about the chibi stuff he's good with that.
>>>
>>>  I've always thought about a fg based on the paths of darkness books.
>>>
>>> ​
>>>
>>>  On 17 February 2015 at 22:02, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> *lol* That's frightfully ambitious :P
>>> My beat-em-up idea was actually inspired by a little known GBA game
>>> featuring Tiny Toons characters. The game is forgettable but the concept is
>>> great. It's a standard beat-em-up at it's core, but with one fundamental
>>> difference: Assist characters *lol*
>>> You select a partner from a list of available characters. Each character
>>> has a special ability that allows you to extend combos or deal with
>>> multiple enemies. I want to expand on that in a creative way.
>>> My games will feature ninjas, unsurprisingly :P Chibi female ninjas, to
>>> be exact.
>>>  On 17 Feb 2015 21:52, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I want to make a side scrolling beat em up in the graphic style of
>>> Guilty Gear, the same graphic generating capability of No Man's Sky, the
>>> character edit functionality of a chinese mmo and the ability to be able to
>>> edit every character's movelist with all the attacks of the last 10years
>>> worth of fighting games.
>>> Oh, and I want it to be cross platform, and have the custom created
>>> characters to be dlc bosses in other peoples versions of the game.
>>> Can it do that?
>>>  On 17 Feb 2015 21:47, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>   If you want to make games, jump straight into Game Maker Studio.  The
>>> standard edition is free.
>>>
>>> https://www.yoyogames.com/studio
>>>  You'll be making games and learning to program at the same time,
>>> without the hassle of learning the technical stuff.  Plus there's loads of
>>> tutorials.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vdfs08TyH-U
>>>  And of course you can make much more complex stuff.
>>>
>>> http://sandbox.yoyogames.com/browse?sort=top-rated
>>>
>>>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  I've just taken it up as a hobby for now *lol* I've had this idea for
>>> a game that I'd like to work on once I've improved my knowledge and
>>> proficiency somewhat, but that's still far off. Right now I'm comfortable
>>> just getting to grips with the basics.
>>>
>>>  The lessons haven't covered looping or arrays yet but I suppose that
>>> bridge will be crossed eventually :P I've been learning about strings,
>>> boolean, if/else statements, variables, functions, etc. It's been an
>>> interesting journey thus far :)
>>>
>>>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:50 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Awesome news on programming bro :] It's a pretty rewarding field if
>>> you stick with it. It can be hard to wrap your head around some of the
>>> initial concepts but like anything it tends to get easier with time.
>>>
>>>  Have you done any form of looping yet? Or arrays? They're probably
>>> some of the trickier initial concepts if you're starting out.
>>>
>>>  An example of a simple but effective exercise would be to try and
>>> write a function that takes an input and checks whether it's a palindrome,
>>> i.e whether it reads the same forward of backwards, i.e. bob or level.
>>> Sometimes just writing down instructions (pseudocode) as you mentioned is
>>> helpful in starting out with some form of answer.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  I'm starting to learn how important that is *lol*. Giving good
>>> instructions.
>>>
>>>  One of the lessons was to create a "Rock, Paper, Scissors" game. It's
>>> amazing just how much goes into something so simple (randomisation,
>>> ensuring that all possible options and decisions are accounted for, etc.).
>>> If there's even one thing that's out of place, everything else falls apart.
>>> I have a newfound respect for coders.
>>>
>>>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Programming is all about giving good instructions.  If you can give
>>> good instructions, you can be a good programmer.
>>>
>>>  The hard part is functional programming because we don't tend to
>>> procedurally, not functionally.  And asynchronous programming can be
>>> tricky, even though in the real world it's a breeze to handle and
>>> understand because we do everything asynchronously.
>>>
>>>  The cool thing about Javascript is that you can use it to learn
>>> functional and procedural techniques.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Well I'm enjoying it so far. I suppose that's the important thing.
>>> Troubleshooting = problem solving = I have a knack.
>>>
>>>  I hate maths though.
>>>
>>>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  You need a knack for problem solving. It can be a lot of fun. From
>>> time to time I will review models and try to track down issues – could be
>>> lousy macros, poor maths or just bad model governance. That’s more my style
>>> than straight programming.
>>> Good luck with it all. I suppose just keep at it.
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>>> *Sent:* 17 February 2015 3:16 PM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>  I've always felt that I don't have a mind for programming, so I'm
>>> trying to see if I'm wrong.
>>>
>>>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Did a couple of years of comp sci at varsity. Quit when I realised it
>>> was nothing like gaming.
>>>
>>> Sent from my Windows Phone
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Ryan Williams<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Sent: ‎2015-‎02-‎17 14:54
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>
>>> In my experience, the first few lessons were simple enough to grasp.
>>> Shit gets real after that. Currently learning functions.
>>>
>>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:51, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> f I stopped somewhere at the beginning , writing my name or something.
>>>
>>> kuk is hard.
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:49:54 +0200
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yar. Learning Javascript.
>>>
>>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:49, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> code academy?
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:48:18 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>
>>> End of the month.
>>>
>>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:47, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> So no Kamimodo this week?
>>> :(
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm learning how to code.
>>>
>>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:45, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> 1...2....3....4....
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:43:44 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Tumbooroo weedo
>>>
>>> On 17 February 2015 at 13:07, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> :(
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:01:32 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> @paas
>>> I see you cannot use the PSN+ Guilty Gear colours on the ps3 version.
>>> Bummer.
>>>
>>> I-no's looks the best tho.
>>>
>>> On 17 Feb 2015 11:14, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> Egh i stuck running meters and meters of vinyl through a machine today.
>>> Pretty boring but at least I'm near a pc most of the time.
>>>
>>> On 17 February 2015 at 11:10, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> [cid:ii_i692juxm0_14b96cde4c77c2f7]
>>> ​
>>>
>>> On 17 February 2015 at 11:00, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> Are you really happy with a win....
>>>
>>> YES
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> >
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:58:03 +0000
>>>
>>>
>>> Are you really happy with a win where it was the lag that gave it to
>>> you, not your skill?
>>>
>>> Yawn. Having trouble staying awake here.
>>>
>>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>>> On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
>>> Sent: 17 February 2015 10:50 AM
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>> winnings winning
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:42:48 +0200
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> *lol* You mean like me winning all those matches last night? :P
>>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:39, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> [cid:image001.png@01D04AA0.930D4E90 <https://01D04AA0.930D4E90>]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:33:07 +0200
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> You call winning once with 16f delay bopping? The fark outta here.
>>> You'll know what real bopping is on Saturday.
>>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:30, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> wtf!!!!!!!
>>>
>>> sap didn't I bop you last nyt?
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:29:35 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> *lol*
>>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:26, "euraima tobias" <euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> euraima@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> Is it GB's? I knew something was up, letting him bop you like that in
>>> melty... :-?
>>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:21 AM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> I didn't know you were expecting LB.  Congrats.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:58 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> u violet my expectancy
>>>
>>> now im mad
>>>
>>> let the bopping commence
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:56:31 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> He's not unsure, he's in denial.
>>> On 17 Feb 2015 09:55, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> > im unsure whats happening.
>>> LB's epitaph
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:50 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> they probably related to "the answer" somehow.
>>>
>>> also I would like closure on the topic of jeeva or kami this week?
>>>
>>> im unsure whats happening.
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:31:07 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> You have to assume that they can hack basically anything since they've
>>> obtained source code to hardware firmware.  These hacks go way back to
>>> 2001.  Noone knows what they're capable of now.  And you still have to
>>> consider the capabilities of Russia, China, Europe and Israel.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> Can dey hek my iped?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> Interesting material for people who like reading about hacking and spy
>>> programs:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://securelist.com/files/2015/02/Equation_group_questions_and_answers.pdf
>>> tl;dr:  The NSA has an elite hacking group nicknamed "Equation" that,
>>> among other things, has managed to create spyware that infects PC hard
>>> drive firmware and can operate undetected.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> **********************************************************************
>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member
>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>>     ------------------------------
>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   ------------------------------
>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>   ------------------------------
>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>        ------------------------------
>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>   ------------------------------
>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>   ------------------------------
>>>
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     ------------------------------
>>>
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     ------------------------------
>>>
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

JPEG image

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2015