Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:55:18 +0200

We all suck.

Nobody wants to hear that they suck in a game. Hell i'm not even close to
competing against the koreans and japs. But denial won't make you better at
the game. Acceptance and improve.

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Okay, that’s right. And I’ll grant 27 frames is a long time. I think
> Paul’s tracking move is 28f and it feels like forever.
>
> So the fact that we don’t all break throws around 50% of the time means
> that we either all suck, or everyone is really good at reading what break
> you assume the opponent will go for and adjusting your throws accordingly.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 2:45 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> Throws are way "slower" than 12f tho since you need to add the break
> window.
>
> So add another 15frames or so if I remember correctly putting it at
> 27frames.  (Break window could be less... cant remember)
>
> About double the amount of time to react when compared to EWGF.
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:38:53 +0000
>
> Top players can see the arms? Even in TTT2? Okay, then how the hell do
> they get thrown in Tekken? I’ve watched a crap load of Tekken Crash and I
> see top players getting thrown all over the place. If a top player can see
> the arms, then there is no difference to them between having a single throw
> break button or not. They will always know which one to hit.
>
>
>
> Yes, Tekken runs at a slower pace than 2d fighters. That doesn’t make it
> easier to react to some of the slower moves. An EWGF is 13f. That is slower
> than a normal 12f grab. Can you duck an electric on reaction?
>
>
>
> I’m just wondering why this is such an issue. A lot of the time I hit the
> right button to break the grab, but the timing is off. I’m not anything
> like a top player, but I’m better than the average noob. They’re making a
> change to the game that will affect the top 10% of players. And those are
> the players who can see the arms anyway. You don’t think people will adapt
> to this?
>
>
>
> ‘When did they change throws i will need to use?’ No idea. I don’t follow
> what the capos do. I just know that they’ve changed Paul, King and Nina’s
> base throws through the Tekken games.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 2:28 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> First of all, top player CAN see which arm the throw is. You're basing a
> game system on a personal experience? Just because one can't do
> something...doesn't mean everyone else just got lucky when they do it.
>
>
>
> If you know the throw is coming, the majority will duck and ws punish
> that. Top players don't make throws obvious. If it's obvious, you will eat
> a ws punish...which is worst than throw breaks.
>
>
>
> Tekken run at a slower speed than most fighting games. Throws in tekken
> are at 12frames and 15frames. SF and GG is at what? So mashing a button to
> throw break in 2d games works fine because the whole game system revolve in
> that speed. Tekken? no.
>
>
>
> It won't make the game suck. But it does effect players who does use a lot
> of the normal throws. Ofcourse it's good news to players who can't break
> throw and doesn't throw. But as for the person doing the throws? not so
> good.
>
>
>
> Some characters have shitty punishment. Throws is part of their punishing
> game. Capos for example can't do decent punish until 14frames. So their
> 12frame punishment is actually a throw.
>
>
>
> "Anyways, that aside, sure some throws give better oki than others. So
> what? They’ve changed the throws you will need to use. They change throw
> animations from one Tekken to the next. For a large part of the cast, there
> are enough non-standard throws that you can mix it up with them. For the
> rest, well, do you really want each character to have the exact same tools?"
>
>
>
> When did they change throws i will need to use? They've kept the same
> throw animation from T5...some changed a bit yes but not all. And some 1+2
> throws are very obvious compare to others with giant swings, rodeo and
> that. ff+1+2 throws are one of the easiest to break. Even i can break it
> (that says a lot)...because of the ff motion. I didn't say each of the
> character should have the same exact tools. Dumbing down throws to simply
> mashing 1 is what makes each characters having the same tools.
>
>
>
> Again, you're basing throw break mechanic on yourself and Paas...who are
> way too kind to barely throw...
>
>
>
> It won't completely make the game suck but it does make it less top play
> competitive. I wouldn't mind if they make the throw break window smaller
> with this change...but no, they made it even bigger...
>
>
>
> When you play against many different players at arcades. You'll be exposed
> to many type of players and gameplay. Some people utilize throws a lot in
> their gameplay (like me, i'm the throw king in bkk lolz).
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  I seriously don’t see the problem. Firstly, which other games really
> require three different options for breaking, based on a lucky guess? You
> already knew the throw was coming and you hit the button within the window
> to break it. Oh, you didn’t see the hands? Better luck next time. I can’t
> see the hands. It’s not a question of training. I’ve tried to see and if I
> concentrate solely on watching the throw animations, I can see it, but my
> eye sight isn’t good enough for doing it on the fly. I doubt many people’s
> is. That means is comes down to a pure guess.
>
>
>
> Maybe they’ll just reduce the break window for all throws. TTT2 throw
> breaking is not easy.
>
>
>
> Anyways, that aside, sure some throws give better oki than others. So
> what? They’ve changed the throws you will need to use. They change throw
> animations from one Tekken to the next. For a large part of the cast, there
> are enough non-standard throws that you can mix it up with them. For the
> rest, well, do you really want each character to have the exact same tools?
>
>
>
> I don’t see this as any real game changing thing at all. Maybe I’m biased
> by the characters that I play and I have to play against.
>
> Paul, King, Nina – I don’t use normal throws with any of them. Paas plays
> Jack and Lei. Jack has qcf+1, qcb+2, TS, and others. Mostly Paas doesn’t
> use throws unless he’s in stances or they’re in strange situations where I
> usually don’t break not because I didn’t see the hands, but because I
> didn’t see the throw coming.
>
>
>
> Let’s say that I’m completely wrong and this is a major game changer
> because people won’t be spamming throws as much. How is that a terrible
> thing? It’s a change, that’s all. As you say though, ‘it's going to make
> the game suck ‘. I didn’t realise that throw breaking was one guiding
> light stopping Tekken from sucking.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 1:55 PM
>
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> I use A LOT of normal throws. Some character's normal throws are part of
> their game since it puts them on decent oki wake ups.
>
>
>
> Me not breaking throws has nothing to do with making throws easier to
> break. I'm not complaining about me not breaking throws...i'm complaining
> the fact they made 1+3 and 2+4 throws completely useless. 1+3 2+4 throws
> plays a big part in top level. You sidestep and throw and try to block the
> throw animation with your movement and position. Making it even harder to
> see what throws you did. Now? fuck, useless...1+2 throws are used in
> different situation. They are usually used for their small throw break
> window.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  And that from the guy who can’t break throws. Will this actually make
> any difference? Who uses normal throws?
>
> The only time I get a normal 1+3/2+4 throw with Paul is by accident. Most
> characters have special throws with 1,2 and 1+2 breaks, so what’s the issue?
>
> I do use the normal throws with King, but I suppose I shouldn’t.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 12:08 PM
>
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
>
> http://www.avoidingthepuddle.com/news/2015/2/17/tekken-7-all-13-and-24-throws-can-be-broken-with-either-1-or.html
>
>
>
> I hope this isn't true...otherwise, it's going to make the game suck.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Lili's hair looks nice :)
>
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoAeIOXYRHw
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mw-EYlDoeA4
>
>
>
> Oh shit! Dragunov Sweep = Full combo now :D
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:55 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  lol u not ryt
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:53:53 +0000
>
>
>
> Why not? What are they going to do, sue some random FGC in CT? If they do
> send a cease and desist letter, it will be good publicity.
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 9:48 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> im really excited about Saturday. SAP has some evil plans for us.
>
> main thing im concerned about is getting dat publicity out.
>
> im imaging an overlay with kamimodo and cts logo. with facebook kuk
> around. im guessing we not allowed to have Capcom characters in the logo?
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:10:56 +0000
>
> If you’re not using set bracers, then there are better options – at higher
> levels, Ancient Parthan defenders are amazing for Monk and Barb. Hit a
> group and have reduced damage by 50%.
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 9:01 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> ive seen players use that shrine bracer , so that when they do get a
> shrine then elites spawn. which is cool because it reduces your time to go
> search for elites.
>
> the only drawback is that the shrine bracers are ass.
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:50:23 +0000
>
> I’m guessing you mean for solo runs? Party play is a different thing.
>
> Tier list is something like this:
> 1.       DH
> 2.       Monk
> 3.       WD/Wiz
> 4.       Cru
> 5.       Barb
>
> The GR rankings are skewed by the old conduit farming (and outright
> cheating) players.
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 8:47 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> I want to see if a similar build to the wizard's cm build pre ros patch is
> possible.
>
> that was the most OP build in all D3 eva.
>
> where is the wizard in terms of tiers among the classes? im guessing he is
> very poo poo tier.
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:44:07 +0000
>
> Pull is better than stun.
>
>
>
> It essentially does both
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:35:28 +0000
>
> ya I saw that but I they haven't done stun as well. only dashing strike
> and palm whole day.
>
> I thought mirane is outdated now? do people still use it? coz out of all
> my gems that's probably the highest.
>
> anyways, I don't think I can get passed 30 grifts comfortably anymore.
>
> most of my gem levelling came from previous patch holy monk build. haven't
> come close to grfit 35 yet.
>
> all of my dmg came from the FD I used when sunwuko gave us the 20% dmg
> buff. now that they've changed that , I don't use 2h's anymore. 1h's ftw.
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:29:44 +0000
>
> CDR Perma serenity pull/palm monk is probably one of the strongest builds
> in the game.
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:51:36 +0000
>
> im using taeguk with gogons swift.
>
> both are level 35.
>
> haven't tried a rift with new build yet. just been farming better rrog's.
>
> rings are nothing special, I use it for the cdr. that's why I need a
> better rrog. getting that balance just right with dmg and cdr is going to
> be a mission.
>
> ultimately what im going for is to be in permanent lighting epiphany and
> perma serenity. then use stun rune. therefore I can go into a fight , and
> stun everyone around me then the team can just pick them off one at a time.
> I haven't seen anyone attempt this build yet.
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:45:01 +0000
>
> That’s the major problem with barbs as well. I can get to a rift boss with
> 8 or 9 minutes remaining, but not kill him.
>
> What level rift are you running? Also what rings and gems (checking the
> character link takes too long with my dodgy vpn here).
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 7:42 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> morning peeps,
>
> ugh I seem to be having a problem.
>
> im able to dispatch mobs quite easily due to fist of azteraq (exploding
> palm deal 80% more dmg)
>
> problem now im getting is single target dps. it takes too long to kill 1
> thing on its own. kuk game
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:10:24 +0000
>
> If you need tips on magical schoolgirls, Paas is your man.
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel
> *Sent:* 17 February 2015 11:16 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
> You're gonna have to ask Di about the chibi stuff he's good with that.
>
>
>
> I've always thought about a fg based on the paths of darkness books.
>
>
> ​
>
>
>
> On 17 February 2015 at 22:02, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  *lol* That's frightfully ambitious :P
> My beat-em-up idea was actually inspired by a little known GBA game
> featuring Tiny Toons characters. The game is forgettable but the concept is
> great. It's a standard beat-em-up at it's core, but with one fundamental
> difference: Assist characters *lol*
> You select a partner from a list of available characters. Each character
> has a special ability that allows you to extend combos or deal with
> multiple enemies. I want to expand on that in a creative way.
> My games will feature ninjas, unsurprisingly :P Chibi female ninjas, to be
> exact.
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 21:52, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I want to make a side scrolling beat em up in the graphic style of Guilty
> Gear, the same graphic generating capability of No Man's Sky, the character
> edit functionality of a chinese mmo and the ability to be able to edit
> every character's movelist with all the attacks of the last 10years worth
> of fighting games.
> Oh, and I want it to be cross platform, and have the custom created
> characters to be dlc bosses in other peoples versions of the game.
> Can it do that?
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 21:47, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>    If you want to make games, jump straight into Game Maker Studio.  The
> standard edition is free.
>
> https://www.yoyogames.com/studio
>
> You'll be making games and learning to program at the same time, without
> the hassle of learning the technical stuff.  Plus there's loads of
> tutorials.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vdfs08TyH-U
>
> And of course you can make much more complex stuff.
>
> http://sandbox.yoyogames.com/browse?sort=top-rated
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>   I've just taken it up as a hobby for now *lol* I've had this idea for a
> game that I'd like to work on once I've improved my knowledge and
> proficiency somewhat, but that's still far off. Right now I'm comfortable
> just getting to grips with the basics.
>
>
>
> The lessons haven't covered looping or arrays yet but I suppose that
> bridge will be crossed eventually :P I've been learning about strings,
> boolean, if/else statements, variables, functions, etc. It's been an
> interesting journey thus far :)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:50 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>   Awesome news on programming bro :] It's a pretty rewarding field if you
> stick with it. It can be hard to wrap your head around some of the initial
> concepts but like anything it tends to get easier with time.
>
>
>
> Have you done any form of looping yet? Or arrays? They're probably some of
> the trickier initial concepts if you're starting out.
>
>
>
> An example of a simple but effective exercise would be to try and write a
> function that takes an input and checks whether it's a palindrome, i.e
> whether it reads the same forward of backwards, i.e. bob or level.
> Sometimes just writing down instructions (pseudocode) as you mentioned is
> helpful in starting out with some form of answer.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>   I'm starting to learn how important that is *lol*. Giving good
> instructions.
>
>
>
> One of the lessons was to create a "Rock, Paper, Scissors" game. It's
> amazing just how much goes into something so simple (randomisation,
> ensuring that all possible options and decisions are accounted for, etc.).
> If there's even one thing that's out of place, everything else falls apart.
> I have a newfound respect for coders.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Programming is all about giving good instructions.  If you can give good
> instructions, you can be a good programmer.
>
>
>
> The hard part is functional programming because we don't tend to
> procedurally, not functionally.  And asynchronous programming can be
> tricky, even though in the real world it's a breeze to handle and
> understand because we do everything asynchronously.
>
>
>
> The cool thing about Javascript is that you can use it to learn functional
> and procedural techniques.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>   Well I'm enjoying it so far. I suppose that's the important thing.
> Troubleshooting = problem solving = I have a knack.
>
>
>
> I hate maths though.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   You need a knack for problem solving. It can be a lot of fun. From time
> to time I will review models and try to track down issues – could be lousy
> macros, poor maths or just bad model governance. That’s more my style than
> straight programming.
> Good luck with it all. I suppose just keep at it.
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> *Sent:* 17 February 2015 3:16 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> I've always felt that I don't have a mind for programming, so I'm trying
> to see if I'm wrong.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Did a couple of years of comp sci at varsity. Quit when I realised it
> was nothing like gaming.
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ________________________________
> From: Ryan Williams<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: ‎2015-‎02-‎17 14:54
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
> In my experience, the first few lessons were simple enough to grasp. Shit
> gets real after that. Currently learning functions.
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 14:51, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> f I stopped somewhere at the beginning , writing my name or something.
>
> kuk is hard.
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:49:54 +0200
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Yar. Learning Javascript.
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 14:49, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> code academy?
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:48:18 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> End of the month.
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 14:47, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> So no Kamimodo this week?
> :(
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> I'm learning how to code.
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 14:45, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 1...2....3....4....
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:43:44 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Tumbooroo weedo
>
> On 17 February 2015 at 13:07, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> :(
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:01:32 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> @paas
> I see you cannot use the PSN+ Guilty Gear colours on the ps3 version.
> Bummer.
>
> I-no's looks the best tho.
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 11:14, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Egh i stuck running meters and meters of vinyl through a machine today.
> Pretty boring but at least I'm near a pc most of the time.
>
> On 17 February 2015 at 11:10, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> [cid:ii_i692juxm0_14b96cde4c77c2f7]
> ​
>
> On 17 February 2015 at 11:00, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Are you really happy with a win....
>
> YES
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:58:03 +0000
>
>
> Are you really happy with a win where it was the lag that gave it to you,
> not your skill?
>
> Yawn. Having trouble staying awake here.
>
> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
> Sent: 17 February 2015 10:50 AM
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
> winnings winning
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:42:48 +0200
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *lol* You mean like me winning all those matches last night? :P
> On 17 Feb 2015 10:39, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>
> [cid:image001.png@01D04AA0.930D4E90 <https://01D04AA0.930D4E90>]
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:33:07 +0200
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> You call winning once with 16f delay bopping? The fark outta here. You'll
> know what real bopping is on Saturday.
> On 17 Feb 2015 10:30, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> wtf!!!!!!!
>
> sap didn't I bop you last nyt?
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:29:35 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *lol*
> On 17 Feb 2015 10:26, "euraima tobias" <euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> euraima@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Is it GB's? I knew something was up, letting him bop you like that in
> melty... :-?
> On 17 Feb 2015 10:21 AM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> I didn't know you were expecting LB.  Congrats.
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:58 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> u violet my expectancy
>
> now im mad
>
> let the bopping commence
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:56:31 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> He's not unsure, he's in denial.
> On 17 Feb 2015 09:55, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> > im unsure whats happening.
> LB's epitaph
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:50 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> they probably related to "the answer" somehow.
>
> also I would like closure on the topic of jeeva or kami this week?
>
> im unsure whats happening.
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:31:07 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> You have to assume that they can hack basically anything since they've
> obtained source code to hardware firmware.  These hacks go way back to
> 2001.  Noone knows what they're capable of now.  And you still have to
> consider the capabilities of Russia, China, Europe and Israel.
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Can dey hek my iped?
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Interesting material for people who like reading about hacking and spy
> programs:
>
>
> https://securelist.com/files/2015/02/Equation_group_questions_and_answers.pdf
> tl;dr:  The NSA has an elite hacking group nicknamed "Equation" that,
> among other things, has managed to create spyware that infects PC hard
> drive firmware and can operate undetected.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member
> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>   ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>        ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>   ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>   ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>   ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>

JPEG image

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2015