Loving the new throw changes, needs more random ultra tho. On 18 Feb 2015 12:14, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Lol, I suck at breaking throws in Tekken, but that's a ridiculous change. > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> http://www.avoidingthepuddle.com/news/2015/2/17/tekken-7-all-13-and-24-throws-can-be-broken-with-either-1-or.html >> >> I hope this isn't true...otherwise, it's going to make the game suck. >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Lili's hair looks nice :) >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoAeIOXYRHw >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mw-EYlDoeA4 >>>> >>>> Oh shit! Dragunov Sweep = Full combo now :D >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:55 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> lol u not ryt >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:53:53 +0000 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why not? What are they going to do, sue some random FGC in CT? If >>>>> they do send a cease and desist letter, it will be good publicity. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets >>>>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 9:48 AM >>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> im really excited about Saturday. SAP has some evil plans for us. >>>>> >>>>> main thing im concerned about is getting dat publicity out. >>>>> >>>>> im imaging an overlay with kamimodo and cts logo. with facebook kuk >>>>> around. im guessing we not allowed to have Capcom characters in the logo? >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:10:56 +0000 >>>>> >>>>> If you’re not using set bracers, then there are better options – at >>>>> higher levels, Ancient Parthan defenders are amazing for Monk and Barb. >>>>> Hit >>>>> a group and have reduced damage by 50%. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >>>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets >>>>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 9:01 AM >>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ive seen players use that shrine bracer , so that when they do get a >>>>> shrine then elites spawn. which is cool because it reduces your time to go >>>>> search for elites. >>>>> >>>>> the only drawback is that the shrine bracers are ass. >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:50:23 +0000 >>>>> >>>>> I’m guessing you mean for solo runs? Party play is a different thing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Tier list is something like this: >>>>> >>>>> 1. DH >>>>> >>>>> 2. Monk >>>>> >>>>> 3. WD/Wiz >>>>> >>>>> 4. Cru >>>>> >>>>> 5. Barb >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The GR rankings are skewed by the old conduit farming (and outright >>>>> cheating) players. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >>>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets >>>>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 8:47 AM >>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I want to see if a similar build to the wizard's cm build pre ros >>>>> patch is possible. >>>>> >>>>> that was the most OP build in all D3 eva. >>>>> >>>>> where is the wizard in terms of tiers among the classes? im guessing >>>>> he is very poo poo tier. >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:44:07 +0000 >>>>> >>>>> Pull is better than stun. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It essentially does both >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:35:28 +0000 >>>>> >>>>> ya I saw that but I they haven't done stun as well. only dashing >>>>> strike and palm whole day. >>>>> >>>>> I thought mirane is outdated now? do people still use it? coz out of >>>>> all my gems that's probably the highest. >>>>> >>>>> anyways, I don't think I can get passed 30 grifts comfortably anymore. >>>>> >>>>> most of my gem levelling came from previous patch holy monk build. >>>>> haven't come close to grfit 35 yet. >>>>> >>>>> all of my dmg came from the FD I used when sunwuko gave us the 20% dmg >>>>> buff. now that they've changed that , I don't use 2h's anymore. 1h's ftw. >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:29:44 +0000 >>>>> >>>>> CDR Perma serenity pull/palm monk is probably one of the strongest >>>>> builds in the game. >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:51:36 +0000 >>>>> >>>>> im using taeguk with gogons swift. >>>>> >>>>> both are level 35. >>>>> >>>>> haven't tried a rift with new build yet. just been farming better >>>>> rrog's. >>>>> >>>>> rings are nothing special, I use it for the cdr. that's why I need a >>>>> better rrog. getting that balance just right with dmg and cdr is going to >>>>> be a mission. >>>>> >>>>> ultimately what im going for is to be in permanent lighting epiphany >>>>> and perma serenity. then use stun rune. therefore I can go into a fight , >>>>> and stun everyone around me then the team can just pick them off one at a >>>>> time. I haven't seen anyone attempt this build yet. >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:45:01 +0000 >>>>> >>>>> That’s the major problem with barbs as well. I can get to a rift boss >>>>> with 8 or 9 minutes remaining, but not kill him. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What level rift are you running? Also what rings and gems (checking >>>>> the character link takes too long with my dodgy vpn here). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >>>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets >>>>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 7:42 AM >>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> morning peeps, >>>>> >>>>> ugh I seem to be having a problem. >>>>> >>>>> im able to dispatch mobs quite easily due to fist of azteraq >>>>> (exploding palm deal 80% more dmg) >>>>> >>>>> problem now im getting is single target dps. it takes too long to kill >>>>> 1 thing on its own. kuk game >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:10:24 +0000 >>>>> >>>>> If you need tips on magical schoolgirls, Paas is your man. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >>>>> Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel >>>>> *Sent:* 17 February 2015 11:16 PM >>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You're gonna have to ask Di about the chibi stuff he's good with that. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I've always thought about a fg based on the paths of darkness books. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 17 February 2015 at 22:02, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> *lol* That's frightfully ambitious :P >>>>> My beat-em-up idea was actually inspired by a little known GBA game >>>>> featuring Tiny Toons characters. The game is forgettable but the concept >>>>> is >>>>> great. It's a standard beat-em-up at it's core, but with one fundamental >>>>> difference: Assist characters *lol* >>>>> You select a partner from a list of available characters. Each >>>>> character has a special ability that allows you to extend combos or deal >>>>> with multiple enemies. I want to expand on that in a creative way. >>>>> My games will feature ninjas, unsurprisingly :P Chibi female ninjas, >>>>> to be exact. >>>>> >>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 21:52, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I want to make a side scrolling beat em up in the graphic style of >>>>> Guilty Gear, the same graphic generating capability of No Man's Sky, the >>>>> character edit functionality of a chinese mmo and the ability to be able >>>>> to >>>>> edit every character's movelist with all the attacks of the last 10years >>>>> worth of fighting games. >>>>> Oh, and I want it to be cross platform, and have the custom created >>>>> characters to be dlc bosses in other peoples versions of the game. >>>>> Can it do that? >>>>> >>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 21:47, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> If you want to make games, jump straight into Game Maker Studio. >>>>> The standard edition is free. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.yoyogames.com/studio >>>>> >>>>> You'll be making games and learning to program at the same time, >>>>> without the hassle of learning the technical stuff. Plus there's loads of >>>>> tutorials. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vdfs08TyH-U >>>>> >>>>> And of course you can make much more complex stuff. >>>>> >>>>> http://sandbox.yoyogames.com/browse?sort=top-rated >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I've just taken it up as a hobby for now *lol* I've had this idea >>>>> for a game that I'd like to work on once I've improved my knowledge and >>>>> proficiency somewhat, but that's still far off. Right now I'm comfortable >>>>> just getting to grips with the basics. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The lessons haven't covered looping or arrays yet but I suppose that >>>>> bridge will be crossed eventually :P I've been learning about strings, >>>>> boolean, if/else statements, variables, functions, etc. It's been an >>>>> interesting journey thus far :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:50 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Awesome news on programming bro :] It's a pretty rewarding field if >>>>> you stick with it. It can be hard to wrap your head around some of the >>>>> initial concepts but like anything it tends to get easier with time. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Have you done any form of looping yet? Or arrays? They're probably >>>>> some of the trickier initial concepts if you're starting out. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> An example of a simple but effective exercise would be to try and >>>>> write a function that takes an input and checks whether it's a palindrome, >>>>> i.e whether it reads the same forward of backwards, i.e. bob or level. >>>>> Sometimes just writing down instructions (pseudocode) as you mentioned is >>>>> helpful in starting out with some form of answer. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm starting to learn how important that is *lol*. Giving good >>>>> instructions. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> One of the lessons was to create a "Rock, Paper, Scissors" game. It's >>>>> amazing just how much goes into something so simple (randomisation, >>>>> ensuring that all possible options and decisions are accounted for, etc.). >>>>> If there's even one thing that's out of place, everything else falls >>>>> apart. >>>>> I have a newfound respect for coders. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Programming is all about giving good instructions. If you can give >>>>> good instructions, you can be a good programmer. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The hard part is functional programming because we don't tend to >>>>> procedurally, not functionally. And asynchronous programming can be >>>>> tricky, even though in the real world it's a breeze to handle and >>>>> understand because we do everything asynchronously. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The cool thing about Javascript is that you can use it to learn >>>>> functional and procedural techniques. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Well I'm enjoying it so far. I suppose that's the important thing. >>>>> Troubleshooting = problem solving = I have a knack. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I hate maths though. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> You need a knack for problem solving. It can be a lot of fun. From >>>>> time to time I will review models and try to track down issues – could be >>>>> lousy macros, poor maths or just bad model governance. That’s more my >>>>> style >>>>> than straight programming. >>>>> >>>>> Good luck with it all. I suppose just keep at it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams >>>>> *Sent:* 17 February 2015 3:16 PM >>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I've always felt that I don't have a mind for programming, so I'm >>>>> trying to see if I'm wrong. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Did a couple of years of comp sci at varsity. Quit when I realised it >>>>> was nothing like gaming. >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my Windows Phone >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> From: Ryan Williams<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Sent: 2015-02-17 14:54 >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In my experience, the first few lessons were simple enough to grasp. >>>>> Shit gets real after that. Currently learning functions. >>>>> >>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:51, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> f I stopped somewhere at the beginning , writing my name or something. >>>>> >>>>> kuk is hard. >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:49:54 +0200 >>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yar. Learning Javascript. >>>>> >>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:49, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> code academy? >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:48:18 +0200 >>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> End of the month. >>>>> >>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:47, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx >>>>> <mailto:ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> So no Kamimodo this week? >>>>> :( >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >>>>> <mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm learning how to code. >>>>> >>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:45, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> 1...2....3....4.... >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:43:44 +0200 >>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> Tumbooroo weedo >>>>> >>>>> On 17 February 2015 at 13:07, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> <mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> :( >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:01:32 +0200 >>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> @paas >>>>> I see you cannot use the PSN+ Guilty Gear colours on the ps3 version. >>>>> Bummer. >>>>> >>>>> I-no's looks the best tho. >>>>> >>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 11:14, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >>>>> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> Egh i stuck running meters and meters of vinyl through a machine today. >>>>> Pretty boring but at least I'm near a pc most of the time. >>>>> >>>>> On 17 February 2015 at 11:10, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >>>>> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> [cid:ii_i692juxm0_14b96cde4c77c2f7] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 17 February 2015 at 11:00, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> Are you really happy with a win.... >>>>> >>>>> YES >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:58:03 +0000 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Are you really happy with a win where it was the lag that gave it to >>>>> you, not your skill? >>>>> >>>>> Yawn. Having trouble staying awake here. >>>>> >>>>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets >>>>> Sent: 17 February 2015 10:50 AM >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> >>>>> winnings winning >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:42:48 +0200 >>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> *lol* You mean like me winning all those matches last night? :P >>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:39, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [cid:image001.png@01D04AA0.930D4E90 <https://01D04AA0.930D4E90>] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:33:07 +0200 >>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> You call winning once with 16f delay bopping? The fark outta here. >>>>> You'll know what real bopping is on Saturday. >>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:30, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> wtf!!!!!!! >>>>> >>>>> sap didn't I bop you last nyt? >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:29:35 +0200 >>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> *lol* >>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:26, "euraima tobias" <euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>>> euraima@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> Is it GB's? I knew something was up, letting him bop you like that in >>>>> melty... :-? >>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:21 AM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> I didn't know you were expecting LB. Congrats. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:58 AM, lindsey kiviets < >>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> u violet my expectancy >>>>> >>>>> now im mad >>>>> >>>>> let the bopping commence >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:56:31 +0200 >>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> He's not unsure, he's in denial. >>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 09:55, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> > im unsure whats happening. >>>>> LB's epitaph >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:50 AM, lindsey kiviets < >>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> they probably related to "the answer" somehow. >>>>> >>>>> also I would like closure on the topic of jeeva or kami this week? >>>>> >>>>> im unsure whats happening. >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:31:07 +0200 >>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> You have to assume that they can hack basically anything since they've >>>>> obtained source code to hardware firmware. These hacks go way back to >>>>> 2001. Noone knows what they're capable of now. And you still have to >>>>> consider the capabilities of Russia, China, Europe and Israel. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Stephen Scheidel < >>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> Can dey hek my iped? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx >>>>> <mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> Interesting material for people who like reading about hacking and spy >>>>> programs: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://securelist.com/files/2015/02/Equation_group_questions_and_answers.pdf >>>>> tl;dr: The NSA has an elite hacking group nicknamed "Equation" that, >>>>> among other things, has managed to create spyware that infects PC hard >>>>> drive firmware and can operate undetected. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send >>>>> to >>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in >>>>> this >>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>>> >>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>>> >>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. >>>>> Information >>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>>> >>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>>> AntiVirus software. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ********************************************************************** >>>>> >>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send >>>>> to >>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in >>>>> this >>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>>> >>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>>> >>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. >>>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member >>>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>>> >>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>>> AntiVirus software. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send >>>>> to >>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in >>>>> this >>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>>> >>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>>> >>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. >>>>> Information >>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>>> >>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>>> AntiVirus software. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send >>>>> to >>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in >>>>> this >>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>>> >>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>>> >>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. >>>>> Information >>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>>> >>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>>> AntiVirus software. >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send >>>>> to >>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in >>>>> this >>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>>> >>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>>> >>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. >>>>> Information >>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>>> >>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>>> AntiVirus software. >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send >>>>> to >>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in >>>>> this >>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>>> >>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>>> >>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. >>>>> Information >>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>>> >>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>>> AntiVirus software. >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send >>>>> to >>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in >>>>> this >>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>>> >>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>>> >>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. >>>>> Information >>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>>> >>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>>> AntiVirus software. >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send >>>>> to >>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in >>>>> this >>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>>> >>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>>> >>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. >>>>> Information >>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>>> >>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>>> AntiVirus software. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >