Yeah you're right about basic logic and stats. Application of Bayes theorem follows on from that. Randomness is a deceptively hard concept to understand. I've had countless arguments with people who think they know the difference between Random, Pseudo Random and Chaotic, On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Together with the Bayesian, I’d add a basic understanding of how arguing > works – I mean reasoning, not LB stuff. > > > > Some basic stats wouldn’t go remiss either. Most people don’t understand > basic probability. I suppose you’d need this before hitting the Bayesian > stuff anyway. > > > > My biggest logic/maths bugbear – random. I understand how random works, > but I ignore the concept far too often. It’s so much nicer to find > patterns, whether they’re there or not. > > > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama > *Sent:* 17 February 2015 4:45 PM > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > I read once that the most important things to understand at a fundamental > level are exponential growth and Bayesian reasoning. > > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There are things that they really should teach people in school that > they don’t. > > Everyone should learn basic contract law. This would stop a whole lot of > people from getting screwed over because they signed something that they > didn’t understand. This is especially important considering how our > national credit act works. > > The second thing they should teach people is how to budget, including how > interest works and the time value of money. Show people what they’re > actually paying. Help them to understand how saving will work and how to > manage on a limited budget. You can do this at a young age. It’s the > practical use of maths that they need to get into people’s heads. > > > > 90% of the maths that I learned has done nothing for me (personal life, > not work life). Once you actually do some vaguely advanced maths – I mean > matric level stuff like Riemenn sums – you can see how it can be used, > especially if you’re doing physics at the same time. For the rest, you > don’t really need it. When last did anyone here need to calculate the > volume of a sphere? > > > > I do understand that you need a proper maths base before you head to the > advanced stuff, and I’m sure people who know a lot more about teaching than > I do have thought about this, but I do wonder why school maths isn’t more > practical. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams > *Sent:* 17 February 2015 3:31 PM > > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > I think I'd be more fond of maths if I could have applied it practically > at a young age. > > > > Despite not being the greatest fan of it, if I can apply something > logically and have it make sense that way, it sticks. > > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Meh, maths is broad enough that you can find some of it that works for > you. The maths that we did for comp sci was discrete structures. It doesn’t > match anything that we did in school – more logic than calculus or algebra. > Google ‘strong induction’ for an idea of what it is. > > > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams > *Sent:* 17 February 2015 3:24 PM > > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > Well I'm enjoying it so far. I suppose that's the important thing. > Troubleshooting = problem solving = I have a knack. > > > > I hate maths though. > > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > You need a knack for problem solving. It can be a lot of fun. From time > to time I will review models and try to track down issues – could be lousy > macros, poor maths or just bad model governance. That’s more my style than > straight programming. > > Good luck with it all. I suppose just keep at it. > > > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams > *Sent:* 17 February 2015 3:16 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > I've always felt that I don't have a mind for programming, so I'm trying > to see if I'm wrong. > > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Did a couple of years of comp sci at varsity. Quit when I realised it was > nothing like gaming. > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ________________________________ > From: Ryan Williams<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 2015-02-17 14:54 > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > > In my experience, the first few lessons were simple enough to grasp. Shit > gets real after that. Currently learning functions. > > On 17 Feb 2015 14:51, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: > lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > f I stopped somewhere at the beginning , writing my name or something. > > kuk is hard. > > ________________________________ > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:49:54 +0200 > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Yar. Learning Javascript. > > On 17 Feb 2015 14:49, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: > lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > code academy? > > ________________________________ > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:48:18 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > End of the month. > > On 17 Feb 2015 14:47, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: > ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > So no Kamimodo this week? > :( > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > <mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > I'm learning how to code. > > On 17 Feb 2015 14:45, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: > lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > 1...2....3....4.... > > ________________________________ > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:43:44 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Tumbooroo weedo > > On 17 February 2015 at 13:07, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: > paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > :( > > ________________________________ > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:01:32 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > @paas > I see you cannot use the PSN+ Guilty Gear colours on the ps3 version. > Bummer. > > I-no's looks the best tho. > > On 17 Feb 2015 11:14, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: > gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > Egh i stuck running meters and meters of vinyl through a machine today. > Pretty boring but at least I'm near a pc most of the time. > > On 17 February 2015 at 11:10, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > [cid:ii_i692juxm0_14b96cde4c77c2f7] > > > On 17 February 2015 at 11:00, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > Are you really happy with a win.... > > YES > > > ________________________________ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:58:03 +0000 > > > Are you really happy with a win where it was the lag that gave it to you, > not your skill? > > Yawn. Having trouble staying awake here. > > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] > On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets > Sent: 17 February 2015 10:50 AM > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > winnings winning > > ________________________________ > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:42:48 +0200 > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > *lol* You mean like me winning all those matches last night? :P > On 17 Feb 2015 10:39, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: > lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > [cid:image001.png@01D04AA0.930D4E90] > > > > ________________________________ > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:33:07 +0200 > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > You call winning once with 16f delay bopping? The fark outta here. You'll > know what real bopping is on Saturday. > On 17 Feb 2015 10:30, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: > lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > wtf!!!!!!! > > sap didn't I bop you last nyt? > > ________________________________ > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:29:35 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > *lol* > On 17 Feb 2015 10:26, "euraima tobias" <euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: > euraima@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > Is it GB's? I knew something was up, letting him bop you like that in > melty... :-? > On 17 Feb 2015 10:21 AM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: > ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > I didn't know you were expecting LB. Congrats. > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:58 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > u violet my expectancy > > now im mad > > let the bopping commence > > ________________________________ > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:56:31 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > He's not unsure, he's in denial. > On 17 Feb 2015 09:55, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: > ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > im unsure whats happening. > LB's epitaph > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:50 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > they probably related to "the answer" somehow. > > also I would like closure on the topic of jeeva or kami this week? > > im unsure whats happening. > > ________________________________ > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:31:07 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > You have to assume that they can hack basically anything since they've > obtained source code to hardware firmware. These hacks go way back to > 2001. Noone knows what they're capable of now. And you still have to > consider the capabilities of Russia, China, Europe and Israel. > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > Can dey hek my iped? > > > On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: > ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > Interesting material for people who like reading about hacking and spy > programs: > > > https://securelist.com/files/2015/02/Equation_group_questions_and_answers.pdf > tl;dr: The NSA has an elite hacking group nicknamed "Equation" that, > among other things, has managed to create spyware that infects PC hard > drive firmware and can operate undetected. > > > > ________________________________ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > > > ********************************************************************** > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. > Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member > firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. >