Yes, he really is. On 17 Feb 2015 10:58, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Are you really happy with a win where it was the lag that gave it to > you, not your skill? > > > > Yawn. Having trouble staying awake here. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets > *Sent:* 17 February 2015 10:50 AM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > winnings winning > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:42:48 +0200 > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > *lol* You mean like me winning all those matches last night? :P > > On 17 Feb 2015 10:39, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:33:07 +0200 > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > You call winning once with 16f delay bopping? The fark outta here. You'll > know what real bopping is on Saturday. > > On 17 Feb 2015 10:30, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > wtf!!!!!!! > > sap didn't I bop you last nyt? > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:29:35 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > *lol* > > On 17 Feb 2015 10:26, "euraima tobias" <euraima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Is it GB's? I knew something was up, letting him bop you like that in > melty... :-? > > On 17 Feb 2015 10:21 AM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I didn't know you were expecting LB. Congrats. > > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:58 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > u violet my expectancy > > now im mad > > let the bopping commence > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:56:31 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > He's not unsure, he's in denial. > > On 17 Feb 2015 09:55, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > im unsure whats happening. > > LB's epitaph > > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:50 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > they probably related to "the answer" somehow. > > also I would like closure on the topic of jeeva or kami this week? > > im unsure whats happening. > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:31:07 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > You have to assume that they can hack basically anything since they've > obtained source code to hardware firmware. These hacks go way back to > 2001. Noone knows what they're capable of now. And you still have to > consider the capabilities of Russia, China, Europe and Israel. > > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Can dey hek my iped? > > > > On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Interesting material for people who like reading about hacking and spy > programs: > > > https://securelist.com/files/2015/02/Equation_group_questions_and_answers.pdf > > tl;dr: The NSA has an elite hacking group nicknamed "Equation" that, > among other things, has managed to create spyware that infects PC hard > drive firmware and can operate undetected. > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. >