Yeah. T6BR he's pretty midlow...because his d+3,4 wasn't NC!!! lolz d+3,4 being NC helps him A LOT for his FLA mix up. And the damage isn't too bad either in TTT2 Tag mode. Vanilla T6 Hwoarang can kill you with 1 JFSR combo easily lolz. Vanilla T6 is the best...broken crap everywhere...other than Capos...Capos was shit tier...can't B! in combos...that only happened in BR. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Whoa, just been checking out the tier lists and you’re right. I hadn’t > realise that he was that high. I was still thinking of him in T6. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong > *Sent:* 16 January 2015 2:50 PM > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > His tier list in TTT7 is pretty high...A... > > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > He’s always a bottom tier hero – huge combo damage and nothing else. > > His mix-up/pressure game in TTT2 is actually pretty good. Massive > irritation to play against. > > Not a noob friendly character at all though. > > > > Namco has strange ideas about nerfing. Yoshi is a good example. > > Game is generally so well balanced that it doesn’t matter much. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama > *Sent:* 16 January 2015 2:40 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > Why would they nerf Hwoarang... > > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Here Richard. > > > > No Bound = better in terms on no ridiculous wall bound combo (eg. Lars, > Nina). But we got the new "Tailspin" which is fair. Will take some time to > get used to the fact Bound is gone but it'll be fine. > > > > Old Bound moves now spike opponent "facedown feet away" position...which > is a bit ridiculous at the wall...the oki option is too strong... > > > > Lars is nerfed pretty bad. Less noob friendly. Which is good. > > > > Hwoarang is nerfed badly too. Especially with the new mechanic Power Crush. > > > > Power Crush (Power Crush = SF red focus) seems unbalanced at the moment. > The risk and reward is favouring the person with the highest health. It was > introduced to help players stuck in pressure situation like Hwoarang's > kicks, Nina's df+1 ss1 nonsense. But from what i saw at location test. It > helped solve only a bit of pressure issue...while what i saw is people with > full health bar spamming Power Crush moves until it kills the low hp > opponent...some power crush moves are safe...They need to fix this some > how. Make it Crush but punishable at least. > > > > Rage Arts (SF Ultra) doesn't seem useful...more flashy and > gimmicky...it'll be REALLY hard to land it on high level play. > > > > Overall, still too soon to judge the whole game as a whole. Going back to > 1v1 is good. New characters doesn't seem too crazy. Only complaint would be > Lucky Chloe...she should have different color hair...cos she looks too > similar to Lili. Otherwise i'm looking forward to play > Katarina...(uf+4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4 lolz) > > > > It would be ideal for T7 to do the reverse Rage system like SoulCalibur 5 > where pokes do less damage if opponent's life is low or at "rage"...so they > need to do higher dmg moves which usually means it's somewhat less pressure > and more punishable (jabs or launch)...but Harada is too taken by SF > partnership...so he's stealing SF mechanics... > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. >