Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Ashraf Barendse <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:50:28 +0200

Wow, Jackie Chan actually has legit footsies.

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> What did they end up changing to the set?  Didnt see anything in the
> patchnotes.
>
> The preview stuff they had for the set sounded like it was going to
> definitely buff the lightning set.
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 07:28:10 +0000
>
>
> they nerfed monks 7 set lighting monk build even more.
>
> shame, I always wanted it to be viable and in the press conference they
> said they wanted it too. WTF is going on?
>
> ------------------------------
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 05:19:15 +0000
>
>  Tried a rift with my barb – 36. Cleared it pretty easily. Failed 37 by
> about 4 seconds.
>
> I hate waiting while my Barb lies dead.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 16 January 2015 7:18 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> Morning peeps,
>
> seems like tempest rush is the new hotness. Theres a guy on youtube who
> managed to crit over 8 billion in the ptr
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 01:26:55 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> It appears we were playing Jackie Chan completely wrong...
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YISTVm9I6T0
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Looks like inputs aren't buffered during the input freeze in GGXrd.  I
> tried to punish Sol's Tyrant Rave with various supers but there just isn't
> enough time to input the super (6f).  You can throw him out of it though.
>
>
>   ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>

Other related posts: