Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 19:09:39 +0200

He's not that great according to JDCR and Knee. I'm not sure what exactly.
But Law isn't high tier in TTT2 either. He does have a few good T!
combos...but seems okay :/

I think it has more to do with his pokes and normal moves. Still in
location test, so a lot can change in final build. During T6 location test,
eddy had Back Turn options...

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Oh I thought Di said he's not as great damage-wise as the rest of the
> cast. But, to be honest, I haven't seen all that much of him in action so
> I'll take your word for it.
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> From what I've seen Law is good in T7.
>>
>> On 12 February 2015 at 18:18, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Well he's not as strong as the rest of the cast right? Yeah, I'll play
>>> him.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We all play Law.
>>>> O_o
>>>>
>>>> On 12 February 2015 at 18:14, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> My new main, seeing as how Namco gives no fucks about Yoshi.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 555
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If Chloe has proper hard jf's like Setsuka then I won't mind being
>>>>>> rolled around by her.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12 February 2015 at 18:06, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 555...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> how you know that is beyond me...i don't even use it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>>>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 4 4 life
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which number is like lol in Thai ?
>>>>>>>> I can't remember.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12 February 2015 at 18:03, Stephen Scheidel <
>>>>>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yeah I figured it will work like Kaz's wd throw
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12 February 2015 at 17:59, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't think he'll be as easy as Lars. Lars's one is f+3...at
>>>>>>>>>> least Shaheen is d/f d/f...so it's similar to doing ff. Which means 
>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>> riskier than just doing f+3 like Lars. As for the throw is probably 
>>>>>>>>>> 1+2
>>>>>>>>>> break. Highly unlikely they'll give him multiple throw break 
>>>>>>>>>> options. It's
>>>>>>>>>> similar to Jaycee's f+3~1+2 throw mechanic. Nothing ground breaking 
>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>> broken.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As for the low like tackle stance...I wouldn't say he'll go as
>>>>>>>>>> low as Zafina's Tarantula stance. More likely similar to normal 
>>>>>>>>>> universal
>>>>>>>>>> tackle.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The one that worries me now is Claudio. His tools is damn good.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As for easy inputs...nothing beats Katarina!
>>>>>>>>>> 4,4,4,4,4,4,,4,4,4,4,4,4 ftw
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>>>>>>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> " He has something similiar to a Mist Step which is done by
>>>>>>>>>>> pressing d/f, d/f which will make Shaheen go go low like a tackle 
>>>>>>>>>>> stance
>>>>>>>>>>> and move towards the opponent. If you collide with the opponent, 
>>>>>>>>>>> Shaheen
>>>>>>>>>>> will transition to a throw attack."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So you can just mash on d/f and if the opponent is doing "the
>>>>>>>>>>> statue" they get thrown ?
>>>>>>>>>>> Prob wont be that bad because it will probs only be one throw
>>>>>>>>>>> that gets broken the same way every time.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> First they give this Lars shit eater easy flashy movement now
>>>>>>>>>>> they give another new turd auto throw out of wd.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> They do make it hard to like the game when they give us this
>>>>>>>>>>> shit.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12 February 2015 at 11:42, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>>>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Spidey is all good, but they don’t need him in Civil War. Are
>>>>>>>>>>>> any of the Avengers worried about their identity? That was the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> whole point
>>>>>>>>>>>> in Spidey being in that story. Maybe they’ll rewrite his story for 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> movie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 12 February 2015 11:23 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure if this was already mentioned, but Spidey is now
>>>>>>>>>>>> allowed to show up on Marvel movies. Mostly likely Captain 
>>>>>>>>>>>> America: Civil
>>>>>>>>>>>> War.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Too bad they're recasting Peter Parker again...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/paOrHSH.jpg
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Di Lhong <
>>>>>>>>>>>> geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  If he is indeed Hei's bastard son. Hei needs to keep his
>>>>>>>>>>>> pants on...he probably went on a sex rampage around the world when 
>>>>>>>>>>>> he wore
>>>>>>>>>>>> that man-thong in T4. lolz
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  If Shaheen goes into Devil mode he'd become a Jinn aka Genie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
>>>>>>>>>>>> legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Access to this
>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
>>>>>>>>>>>> communication in error, please address with the subject heading 
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Received
>>>>>>>>>>>> in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>> any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
>>>>>>>>>>>> disclosure,
>>>>>>>>>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
>>>>>>>>>>>> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or 
>>>>>>>>>>>> advice
>>>>>>>>>>>> contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions 
>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>> in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions and
>>>>>>>>>>>> other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not 
>>>>>>>>>>>> relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>> the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed 
>>>>>>>>>>>> by it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>>>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> amended, lost,
>>>>>>>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>>>>>> ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm 
>>>>>>>>>>>> providing
>>>>>>>>>>>> services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
>>>>>>>>>>>> International") is a
>>>>>>>>>>>> Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>>>>>>>>>>>> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
>>>>>>>>>>>> provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
>>>>>>>>>>>> International is
>>>>>>>>>>>> a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself 
>>>>>>>>>>>> as such.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local 
>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG member
>>>>>>>>>>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
>>>>>>>>>>>> swept by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2015