RE: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:59:47 +0200

Seconded.

But on a serious note, @OGRS, it's not that l don't respect your thoughts
on the matter or that l'm immune to what is happening in SA. I feel you,
for sure. Ultimately l just don't want people to be upset or depressed
about this kind of stuff, especially here. Let's try to keep our spirits
up, shall we? :) Life is hard enough as it is.
On 9 Feb 2015 16:55, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Mails needs less politics and more GG
>
> :D
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:53:28 +0200
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I suppose we all have our coping mechanisms. But for me it's like sharing
> the road with a bunch of fuckups who don't know how to drive and put other
> lives at risk. Can l change it? No. I'd love to, but l can't.  It's out of
> my hands. I can talk about it, sure. It will still be there waiting for me
> tomorrow.
>
> I'd rather focus on improving my quality of life instead of upsetting
> myself about things that are beyond my control. Talking can be therapeutic
> but fuck, l'd rather just live my life instead of exhausting my mental and
> emotional energy on bullshit.
> On 9 Feb 2015 16:46, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Perhaps he is just venting and in doing so, calming himself down.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> *Sent:* 09 February 2015 4:44 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
> Well what do you propose? That's all l'm saying. You end up upsetting
> yourself over something you can't change. No one (outside of the downright
> naive or uninformed ) is oblivious to what's happening here. If everyone
> was like-minded enough for the government to give an actual fuck about
> what's going on, that would be a different story altogether, but we all
> know that's not the case.
>
> On 9 Feb 2015 16:40, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Yeah but ignoring does very little too.
>
>
>
> On 9 February 2015 at 16:37, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Why you guys feel the need to fuck up the mails with depro chat is beyond
> me.
> Talking about it sure as fuck doesn't make the problems go away. Nothing
> short of civil war or a miracle is going to change the current state of our
> country.
>
> On 9 Feb 2015 16:31, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Sadly that will never happen...the media is covering random stories way
> too much and try to distract people from actual issues.
>
>
>
> All these "celebrity" magazines, reality tv and many other things
> contribute to keep dumb people on a leash.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Nah people just need to wake up and get educated.
>
>
>
> On 9 February 2015 at 16:27, richard moorcroft <
> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If things keep going like this south Africa will be NO MORE,, just some
> pile of dirt on earth,, all these corrupted fuckers must be assassinated,,
> or locked away forever
>
> On Feb 9, 2015 4:19 PM, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Ag what can we expect when the president is a fucking piece of shit
> thief who will be replaced by another piece of shit thief.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpOHTThrJfU
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 9 February 2015 at 16:13, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Exactly.  I remember when R10m could get you on of the best spots on the
> Waterfront Marina.  It sells for close to R100m these days.
>
> I wanna be a benevolent slum lord.  The kind that doesn't fix the
> elevators because using the stairs is healthier and it saves on precious
> electricity.
>
> The hero that Cape Town needs, but doesn't want.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  And Cape Town is retardedly expensive compared to the rest of the
> country.
>
> For the price of a nice apartment in the City Bowl in Cape Town, you’ll
> get a big house, with garden and a pool and all that jazz, in a nice suburb
> in Jo’burg or Pretoria.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
> *Sent:* 09 February 2015 4:04 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> I'm surprised about the apartment prices in Cape Town. It's pretty cheap
> and the size is pretty ok for it's price compare to Thailand...Thailand you
> can pay a fortune (min. R10m) and get a hole...
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Depends...  the fact that people have the perception of the country
> helps with the property market in Cape Town along the coastal regions.  You
> could buy an apartment for R10m in Sea Point 3 or 4 years ago and sell it
> for R20m now.  That's what all the foreigners are doing.  I get offers from
> foreign buyers for my place a few times a month even though it's not on the
> market.  A friend of mine got an apartment roughly for what I paid for
> mine, but got offered triple the amount in monthly rent from a foreigner.
>
> Personally, I think it would be cool if the country goes to shit for like
> 6 months so that I can buy more property for dirt cheap.  And then rent it
> out at prices only the 0.1% can afford when it gets back on its feet.
>
> But that's just me being a selfish prick.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:45 PM, richard moorcroft <
> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think south Africa will be super shit poor in the next 2 years,, this
> country is super fucked in my opinion,. Well not yet but let's see in 2
> years from now
>
> On Feb 9, 2015 3:36 PM, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  The stupidity,selfishness and greed are sickening.
>
>
>
> On 9 February 2015 at 15:31, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Eskom CEO's just sit and rake in money.
>
>
>
> ON street level my buddy Jacques does electrical.
>
> By law there are certain things only council can do wrt connecting some
> stuff.
>
>
>
> One example is (happened last week on a site jaq was on) The council needs
> to come connect the earth for a new house.
>
> This is a simple job that one person could do in 30 mins.
>
> council rocked up with 4 guys in a van who had to borrow Jaqs tools .....
> and ask what to do and where to do it (no idea or care what their jobs are)
>
> Once their job was done they connected some phase thing for regular
> appliances
>
> then connected a multiplug to that and finally plugged in their portable
> fridge and sat and played cards for the rest of the day.
>
>
>
> SA Government is fucking rotten from the inside out all the way down to
> council level.
>
> Obv not everyone ever but ya'll know what i mean.
>
>
>
> On 9 February 2015 at 15:07, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  So according Koichi, elphelt is still fine after the first loketest.
>
> Says she became a little weaker but she still stronger than other
> characters.  Except for Millia.
> Claims other tough matchups for Elphelt is Ky and Sin.
> He mentions Sol and Zato becoming weaker against elphelt as well.
>
> Elphelt can still "win".
>
> Could be inaccurate cause they were google translated tweets.
>  ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 14:38:02 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> *lol*
>
> On 9 Feb 2015 14:16, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Priorities
>
> https://twitter.com/momochi212/status/564507805218922496
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Nice.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Trivia for today.
>
>
> Ever wondered why the sign for a dollar is an S with a line through it?
>
> Originated from a "piece of eight", or *peso de ocho*, which was the
> Spanish dollar.  The plural of Peso was Pesos, or Ps.  Eventually they
> thought it would be a cool idea to merge the P and the S (wtf).  And then
> that eventually became the dollar sign we know today.
>
>
> [image:
> http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--uOXopszK--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/owfeiyfhrnajtuklhxw1.png]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>

Other related posts: