Di this is where our President lives. On 9 February 2015 at 16:28, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That's not a bad idea. > > Some government will never fully support education. They want to keep the > majority stupid so it's easier to win them over during elections. > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> We have too many conservatives masquerading as progressives in >> government. They're conservative about all the wrong things (like >> conserving their position in power), and progressive about equally wrong >> things (like giving people fish instead of teaching them to fish). >> >> In some American states they found that paying teenage girls to stay >> child-free during their high school years actually eased economic strain on >> the cities. There were fewer uneducated mothers who had to quit school to >> support their fatherless kids, plus all the negative stereotypes that go >> along with that. We need to do stuff like that here but it will never >> happen. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> Almost all of our problems are solvable by population control but for >>> some reason everyone in SA needs to have 9 kids or some shit. >>> Fuck it's so idiotic. >>> >>> On 9 February 2015 at 16:08, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> It’s always lousy to watch serious potential squandered. If that just >>>> meant not having the best net access in the world, or dealing with random >>>> corruption, it would be fine, but things in our country aren’t cheerful for >>>> a lot of people. >>>> >>>> Worldwide (mainly Africa) the number of people living below the >>>> breadline has been decreasing pretty much year on year since the last ‘80s. >>>> >>>> In South Africa, the figure is increasing. For a country that doesn’t >>>> have a war ongoing or major natural disasters, that’s pretty sad. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel >>>> *Sent:* 09 February 2015 4:04 PM >>>> >>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Ag it's just sad. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9 February 2015 at 16:01, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah, listen to the person who’s never here. I think Jag is the only >>>> one on this mailing group who spends more time out of the country than I >>>> do. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel >>>> *Sent:* 09 February 2015 3:59 PM >>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> >>>> >>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah Stu knows whats up. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9 February 2015 at 15:56, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Salie don't care bout da collective. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> He just wants to be king turd of shit island. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9 February 2015 at 15:51, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Depends... the fact that people have the perception of the country >>>> helps with the property market in Cape Town along the coastal regions. You >>>> could buy an apartment for R10m in Sea Point 3 or 4 years ago and sell it >>>> for R20m now. That's what all the foreigners are doing. I get offers from >>>> foreign buyers for my place a few times a month even though it's not on the >>>> market. A friend of mine got an apartment roughly for what I paid for >>>> mine, but got offered triple the amount in monthly rent from a foreigner. >>>> >>>> Personally, I think it would be cool if the country goes to shit for >>>> like 6 months so that I can buy more property for dirt cheap. And then >>>> rent it out at prices only the 0.1% can afford when it gets back on its >>>> feet. >>>> >>>> But that's just me being a selfish prick. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:45 PM, richard moorcroft < >>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> I think south Africa will be super shit poor in the next 2 years,, this >>>> country is super fucked in my opinion,. Well not yet but let's see in 2 >>>> years from now >>>> >>>> On Feb 9, 2015 3:36 PM, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> The stupidity,selfishness and greed are sickening. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9 February 2015 at 15:31, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Eskom CEO's just sit and rake in money. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ON street level my buddy Jacques does electrical. >>>> >>>> By law there are certain things only council can do wrt connecting some >>>> stuff. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> One example is (happened last week on a site jaq was on) The council >>>> needs to come connect the earth for a new house. >>>> >>>> This is a simple job that one person could do in 30 mins. >>>> >>>> council rocked up with 4 guys in a van who had to borrow Jaqs tools >>>> ..... and ask what to do and where to do it (no idea or care what their >>>> jobs are) >>>> >>>> Once their job was done they connected some phase thing for regular >>>> appliances >>>> >>>> then connected a multiplug to that and finally plugged in their >>>> portable fridge and sat and played cards for the rest of the day. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> SA Government is fucking rotten from the inside out all the way down to >>>> council level. >>>> >>>> Obv not everyone ever but ya'll know what i mean. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9 February 2015 at 15:07, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> So according Koichi, elphelt is still fine after the first loketest. >>>> >>>> Says she became a little weaker but she still stronger than other >>>> characters. Except for Millia. >>>> Claims other tough matchups for Elphelt is Ky and Sin. >>>> He mentions Sol and Zato becoming weaker against elphelt as well. >>>> >>>> Elphelt can still "win". >>>> >>>> Could be inaccurate cause they were google translated tweets. >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 14:38:02 +0200 >>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *lol* >>>> >>>> On 9 Feb 2015 14:16, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Priorities >>>> >>>> https://twitter.com/momochi212/status/564507805218922496 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Nice. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Trivia for today. >>>> >>>> >>>> Ever wondered why the sign for a dollar is an S with a line through it? >>>> >>>> Originated from a "piece of eight", or *peso de ocho*, which was the >>>> Spanish dollar. The plural of Peso was Pesos, or Ps. Eventually they >>>> thought it would be a cool idea to merge the P and the S (wtf). And then >>>> that eventually became the dollar sign we know today. >>>> >>>> >>>> [image: >>>> http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--uOXopszK--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/owfeiyfhrnajtuklhxw1.png] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>> >>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>> >>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>> >>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>> AntiVirus software. >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>> >>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>> >>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>> >>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>> AntiVirus software. >>>> >>> >>> >> >