Re: CTS community mail
- From: Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:47:42 +0200
"R" "A"
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:43 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> you can only use 1 rage art per round?
>
> what is the notation??
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 01:40:55 -0800
>
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You get 1 rage art and that's it,, and when you use the rage art it is
> your combo ender,, also not all characters can combo into it,, and also
> damage is reduced the bigger your combo,, so at most it will take almost
> half your health
> On Dec 9, 2014 11:37 AM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Rage is a art
>
> 2 is e naff
>
> ------------------------------
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:33:59 +0000
>
> 7 should be just right
>
> I love spamming more than 1 RA. You need to do it properly on not at all!
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:31:45 +0000
>
> 2 is enuff
>
> ------------------------------
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:29:00 +0000
>
> But why not use 5 RA?
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:25:14 +0000
>
> only need 2 RA's to kill
>
> RA
> combo
> fb!
> RA
> combo
> DEATH
>
> ------------------------------
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:21:54 +0000
>
> Why dont you just RA a 3rd and 4th time?
>
> Seems legit
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:19:15 +0000
>
> then its possible to kill with 1 combo
>
> CH RA
> floor break
> RA
> combo ender
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 00:58:34 -0800
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Yes its very possible
> On Dec 9, 2014 10:26 AM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> is it possible to combo from a RA?
>
> ------------------------------
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 08:22:23 +0000
>
> Rage arts damage scales in combos
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 07:59:30 +0000
>
> I imagine that there might actually be 100% combos.
>
> if you take them to the wall, then floor break and rage art = GG
>
> ------------------------------
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 07:54:35 +0000
>
> Bryan was a combo demon even back in T5 days. Lars' combo damage has been
> nerfed into the ground.
> Yes, Mishima's are OP, but if you've put in the time to play them
> properly, you deserve the damage output.
>
> *From*: lindsey kiviets [mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent*: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 09:51 AM South Africa Standard Time
> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: RE: CTS community mail
>
> bryan's combos have been reahauled. no more long B! combos that do no
> damage.
>
> I see from the tekken master cup, the mishima's are pretty OP. Those otg
> combos do mega lota damage.
>
> lars is too cool with arc blast. I don't think lei will be in T7 as, he
> has too many moves and it goes against the tekken revo model that harada is
> working towards.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:35:54 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Oh shoosh.
>
> On 9 December 2014 at 09:34, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Df+2 - more damage, same speed. Not -17.
> Why would deathfist be a problem?
> *From*: Stephen Scheidel [mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent*: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 09:22 AM South Africa Standard Time
>
> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: Re: CTS community mail
>
> I hope that isn't the case.
>
> On 9 December 2014 at 09:13, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> in essence everyone has a deathfist now when they on low health.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:07:45 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Why do games always have to change and if they don't then people bitch.
> If games change too much then people bitch.
>
> I really don't like the new characters in Tekken but thats about it.
> If you look at BR and now T7 they have changed the game a shitload.
> For me I just like the core tekken system and how it feels moving a
> character around the screen.
> If they get that right without screwing things up too much balance wise
> then I'll be happy.
> I would be happiest if they just took BR removed all the shit
> characters,rage,unfair crush and B! ~
> Buuut I'm a boring guy that is happy playing one game.
>
> I just hope this new crush and super thing doesn't ruin everything.
>
> On 8 December 2014 at 20:50, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Street Fighter has had a drastic change from 3 to 4.
> MK has seen a drastic change.
> KOF has had a drastic change.
> Even Killer Instinct.
>
> Tekken adds supers.
> ...and dat stage damage. Wish it would stay damaged.
> Too early to say anything else to be honest. I'd like it to be good.
> On 8 Dec 2014 20:28, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> That's it ,, I am going to murder you in TEKKEN next week,, BE PREPARED,,
> no offense man,, but just try and beat me in a FT5 or a FT3
> On Dec 8, 2014 8:25 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> wtf , i beat yo ass last time
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:24:24 -0800
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I will kill your ass in TEKKEN 7 if you don't train hard LB
> On Dec 8, 2014 8:14 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> t7 is gna be good
>
> #biblethump
> ------------------------------
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:10:30 +0000
>
> Damage drops in Tekken every iteration.
> *From*: Ryan Williams [mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent*: Monday, December 08, 2014 08:09 PM South Africa Standard Time
> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: Re: CTS community mail
>
> Damage from juggles don't seem to hurt all that much. Most of the beefy
> damage seems to come from counter hits.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am I imagining things or is the damage much lower in T7?
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:48 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
> did u watch the matches??????
>
> sap pls
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 19:47:45 +0200
>
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> LB, LB pls and tsek.
> On 8 Dec 2014 19:46, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> wtf , im not trolling , im really excited about this.
>
> it looks more hype. harada might be on to something
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 19:43:33 +0200
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You're still dabes troll LB *lol*
> On 8 Dec 2014 19:41, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/dec/08/finally-some-high-level-tekken-7-matches-exhibition-tournament-footage-20-years-tekken-fanfare-event/
>
> tekken looks hype , the decrease in the roster size got me excited.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:10:39 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Ja, Street Fighter is such an incredible art of fiction as it is, they
> better not stuff it up.
> On 8 Dec 2014 17:06, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I hope it's after 4 ,, they have to progress the story dude
> On Dec 8, 2014 4:53 PM, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If sfv is before 3s they better have oro in there before he started
> handicapping himself.
>
> On Monday, December 8, 2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hypest USFIV match @ NEC
>
> USF4, Pepeday vs Snake Eyez (NEC 15 Loser's Finals)
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDr_IVoKDk8>
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:35 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> speak to me again when its over nine thousand
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:32:49 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Tencent does a lot of things. They even own a share of Epic.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tencent
>
> They're one of the reasons Naspers' share price is currently over R1400.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:30 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> aren't they the people that made zangdaou ziwang?
>
> also , whens Dengenki gunko fighting climax?
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:26:26 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> 10TB free storage from TenCent:
>
> http://www.1mtb.com/how-to-get-10-tb-free-online-cloud-storage-from-tencent-weiyun/
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Sean Carrington <
> theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> @Nic, I got your sync cable back from Yann. Will bring it on Saturday
> (hopefully)
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Besides the new Lily/Alisa/Ling cat chick I'm actually really liking how
> T7 is looking with the shorter combos
>
> On 8 December 2014 at 13:29, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Just watched the SFV gameplay.
> ground bounce is not rad.
>
> On 8 December 2014 at 13:26, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If Bison dies then Rose also dies because they share the same soul. In
> fact, Rose was also believed to be dead in the SF universe but they brought
> her back for SFIV.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:56 PM, richard moorcroft <
> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Wow so Bison is immortal,, he can't die cause of his psycho power?? So he
> will always have a nice new body after the other 1 dies or gets crushed
> AGAIN
> On Dec 8, 2014 12:53 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> M.Bison was killed by Akuma in Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo. Prior to
> SFIII, he was considered to be dead. It was revealed in SFIV that his
> subordinates created a new body for him. Noone knows what happens to Bison
> after SFIV.
>
> As for SFV, we don't know where it takes place on the timeline, but you
> can see Ryu has some of his 3rd Strike moves (his cr.mk resembles Akuma's
> sweep). This implies that Ryu is maturing, so it definitely happens after
> SFIV, but we can't say for sure that it happens after SFIII.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:41 PM, richard moorcroft <
> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So no Bison?? Or do they always include D E A D characters??
> On Dec 8, 2014 11:42 AM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ugh meant 5
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:16:39 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> LB please.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:15 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> wtf I thought it was Friday!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:11:52 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Fight night saturday you nooblet.
>
> Sap, are we having a session at Kami as well, or are we going to jeeva's
> first then shooting through?
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Pepeday makes me like Fuerte for 5 minutes. His losers' finals set vs
> Snake Eyez was amazing.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:58 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
> erm no , I mean friday
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:56:51 -0800
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> You mean Saturday
> On Dec 8, 2014 9:52 AM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> morning peeps,
>
> What r the plan for this Friday?
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 07:01:45 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> [image: Smiling face with open mouth]
>
> On Monday, December 8, 2014, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Looks like an atooget free zone.
>
> On Monday, December 8, 2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 1 block from me:
> https://twitter.com/The_360_Lounge
>
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> KOFXIII at NEC is pretty hype right now
>
> http://www.twitch.tv/teamsp00ky
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
Other related posts:
