RE: CTS community mail
- From: richard moorcroft <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 01:40:55 -0800
You get 1 rage art and that's it,, and when you use the rage art it is your
combo ender,, also not all characters can combo into it,, and also damage
is reduced the bigger your combo,, so at most it will take almost half your
health
On Dec 9, 2014 11:37 AM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rage is a art
>
> 2 is e naff
>
> ------------------------------
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:33:59 +0000
>
> 7 should be just right
>
> I love spamming more than 1 RA. You need to do it properly on not at all!
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:31:45 +0000
>
> 2 is enuff
>
> ------------------------------
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:29:00 +0000
>
> But why not use 5 RA?
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:25:14 +0000
>
> only need 2 RA's to kill
>
> RA
> combo
> fb!
> RA
> combo
> DEATH
>
> ------------------------------
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:21:54 +0000
>
> Why dont you just RA a 3rd and 4th time?
>
> Seems legit
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:19:15 +0000
>
> then its possible to kill with 1 combo
>
> CH RA
> floor break
> RA
> combo ender
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 00:58:34 -0800
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Yes its very possible
> On Dec 9, 2014 10:26 AM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> is it possible to combo from a RA?
>
> ------------------------------
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 08:22:23 +0000
>
> Rage arts damage scales in combos
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 07:59:30 +0000
>
> I imagine that there might actually be 100% combos.
>
> if you take them to the wall, then floor break and rage art = GG
>
> ------------------------------
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 07:54:35 +0000
>
> Bryan was a combo demon even back in T5 days. Lars' combo damage has been
> nerfed into the ground.
> Yes, Mishima's are OP, but if you've put in the time to play them
> properly, you deserve the damage output.
>
> *From*: lindsey kiviets [mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent*: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 09:51 AM South Africa Standard Time
> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: RE: CTS community mail
>
> bryan's combos have been reahauled. no more long B! combos that do no
> damage.
>
> I see from the tekken master cup, the mishima's are pretty OP. Those otg
> combos do mega lota damage.
>
> lars is too cool with arc blast. I don't think lei will be in T7 as, he
> has too many moves and it goes against the tekken revo model that harada is
> working towards.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:35:54 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Oh shoosh.
>
> On 9 December 2014 at 09:34, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Df+2 - more damage, same speed. Not -17.
> Why would deathfist be a problem?
> *From*: Stephen Scheidel [mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent*: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 09:22 AM South Africa Standard Time
>
> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: Re: CTS community mail
>
> I hope that isn't the case.
>
> On 9 December 2014 at 09:13, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> in essence everyone has a deathfist now when they on low health.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:07:45 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Why do games always have to change and if they don't then people bitch.
> If games change too much then people bitch.
>
> I really don't like the new characters in Tekken but thats about it.
> If you look at BR and now T7 they have changed the game a shitload.
> For me I just like the core tekken system and how it feels moving a
> character around the screen.
> If they get that right without screwing things up too much balance wise
> then I'll be happy.
> I would be happiest if they just took BR removed all the shit
> characters,rage,unfair crush and B! ~
> Buuut I'm a boring guy that is happy playing one game.
>
> I just hope this new crush and super thing doesn't ruin everything.
>
> On 8 December 2014 at 20:50, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Street Fighter has had a drastic change from 3 to 4.
> MK has seen a drastic change.
> KOF has had a drastic change.
> Even Killer Instinct.
>
> Tekken adds supers.
> ...and dat stage damage. Wish it would stay damaged.
> Too early to say anything else to be honest. I'd like it to be good.
> On 8 Dec 2014 20:28, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> That's it ,, I am going to murder you in TEKKEN next week,, BE PREPARED,,
> no offense man,, but just try and beat me in a FT5 or a FT3
> On Dec 8, 2014 8:25 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> wtf , i beat yo ass last time
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:24:24 -0800
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I will kill your ass in TEKKEN 7 if you don't train hard LB
> On Dec 8, 2014 8:14 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> t7 is gna be good
>
> #biblethump
> ------------------------------
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:10:30 +0000
>
> Damage drops in Tekken every iteration.
> *From*: Ryan Williams [mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent*: Monday, December 08, 2014 08:09 PM South Africa Standard Time
> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: Re: CTS community mail
>
> Damage from juggles don't seem to hurt all that much. Most of the beefy
> damage seems to come from counter hits.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am I imagining things or is the damage much lower in T7?
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:48 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
> did u watch the matches??????
>
> sap pls
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 19:47:45 +0200
>
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> LB, LB pls and tsek.
> On 8 Dec 2014 19:46, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> wtf , im not trolling , im really excited about this.
>
> it looks more hype. harada might be on to something
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 19:43:33 +0200
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You're still dabes troll LB *lol*
> On 8 Dec 2014 19:41, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/dec/08/finally-some-high-level-tekken-7-matches-exhibition-tournament-footage-20-years-tekken-fanfare-event/
>
> tekken looks hype , the decrease in the roster size got me excited.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:10:39 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Ja, Street Fighter is such an incredible art of fiction as it is, they
> better not stuff it up.
> On 8 Dec 2014 17:06, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I hope it's after 4 ,, they have to progress the story dude
> On Dec 8, 2014 4:53 PM, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If sfv is before 3s they better have oro in there before he started
> handicapping himself.
>
> On Monday, December 8, 2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hypest USFIV match @ NEC
>
> USF4, Pepeday vs Snake Eyez (NEC 15 Loser's Finals)
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDr_IVoKDk8>
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:35 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> speak to me again when its over nine thousand
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:32:49 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Tencent does a lot of things. They even own a share of Epic.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tencent
>
> They're one of the reasons Naspers' share price is currently over R1400.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:30 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> aren't they the people that made zangdaou ziwang?
>
> also , whens Dengenki gunko fighting climax?
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:26:26 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> 10TB free storage from TenCent:
>
> http://www.1mtb.com/how-to-get-10-tb-free-online-cloud-storage-from-tencent-weiyun/
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Sean Carrington <
> theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> @Nic, I got your sync cable back from Yann. Will bring it on Saturday
> (hopefully)
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Besides the new Lily/Alisa/Ling cat chick I'm actually really liking how
> T7 is looking with the shorter combos
>
> On 8 December 2014 at 13:29, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Just watched the SFV gameplay.
> ground bounce is not rad.
>
> On 8 December 2014 at 13:26, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If Bison dies then Rose also dies because they share the same soul. In
> fact, Rose was also believed to be dead in the SF universe but they brought
> her back for SFIV.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:56 PM, richard moorcroft <
> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Wow so Bison is immortal,, he can't die cause of his psycho power?? So he
> will always have a nice new body after the other 1 dies or gets crushed
> AGAIN
> On Dec 8, 2014 12:53 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> M.Bison was killed by Akuma in Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo. Prior to
> SFIII, he was considered to be dead. It was revealed in SFIV that his
> subordinates created a new body for him. Noone knows what happens to Bison
> after SFIV.
>
> As for SFV, we don't know where it takes place on the timeline, but you
> can see Ryu has some of his 3rd Strike moves (his cr.mk resembles Akuma's
> sweep). This implies that Ryu is maturing, so it definitely happens after
> SFIV, but we can't say for sure that it happens after SFIII.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:41 PM, richard moorcroft <
> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So no Bison?? Or do they always include D E A D characters??
> On Dec 8, 2014 11:42 AM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ugh meant 5
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:16:39 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> LB please.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:15 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> wtf I thought it was Friday!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:11:52 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Fight night saturday you nooblet.
>
> Sap, are we having a session at Kami as well, or are we going to jeeva's
> first then shooting through?
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Pepeday makes me like Fuerte for 5 minutes. His losers' finals set vs
> Snake Eyez was amazing.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:58 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
> erm no , I mean friday
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:56:51 -0800
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> You mean Saturday
> On Dec 8, 2014 9:52 AM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> morning peeps,
>
> What r the plan for this Friday?
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 07:01:45 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> [image: Smiling face with open mouth]
>
> On Monday, December 8, 2014, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Looks like an atooget free zone.
>
> On Monday, December 8, 2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 1 block from me:
> https://twitter.com/The_360_Lounge
>
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> KOFXIII at NEC is pretty hype right now
>
> http://www.twitch.tv/teamsp00ky
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
Other related posts:
