Re: CTS community mail
- From: Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:35:54 +0200
Oh shoosh.
On 9 December 2014 at 09:34, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Df+2 - more damage, same speed. Not -17.
> Why would deathfist be a problem?
> *From*: Stephen Scheidel [mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent*: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 09:22 AM South Africa Standard Time
>
> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: Re: CTS community mail
>
> I hope that isn't the case.
>
> On 9 December 2014 at 09:13, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> in essence everyone has a deathfist now when they on low health.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:07:45 +0200
>>
>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Why do games always have to change and if they don't then people bitch.
>> If games change too much then people bitch.
>>
>> I really don't like the new characters in Tekken but thats about it.
>> If you look at BR and now T7 they have changed the game a shitload.
>> For me I just like the core tekken system and how it feels moving a
>> character around the screen.
>> If they get that right without screwing things up too much balance wise
>> then I'll be happy.
>> I would be happiest if they just took BR removed all the shit
>> characters,rage,unfair crush and B! ~
>> Buuut I'm a boring guy that is happy playing one game.
>>
>> I just hope this new crush and super thing doesn't ruin everything.
>>
>> On 8 December 2014 at 20:50, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Street Fighter has had a drastic change from 3 to 4.
>> MK has seen a drastic change.
>> KOF has had a drastic change.
>> Even Killer Instinct.
>>
>> Tekken adds supers.
>> ...and dat stage damage. Wish it would stay damaged.
>> Too early to say anything else to be honest. I'd like it to be good.
>> On 8 Dec 2014 20:28, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> That's it ,, I am going to murder you in TEKKEN next week,, BE PREPARED,,
>> no offense man,, but just try and beat me in a FT5 or a FT3
>> On Dec 8, 2014 8:25 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>> wtf , i beat yo ass last time
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:24:24 -0800
>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> I will kill your ass in TEKKEN 7 if you don't train hard LB
>> On Dec 8, 2014 8:14 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>> t7 is gna be good
>>
>> #biblethump
>> ------------------------------
>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:10:30 +0000
>>
>> Damage drops in Tekken every iteration.
>> *From*: Ryan Williams [mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx]
>> *Sent*: Monday, December 08, 2014 08:09 PM South Africa Standard Time
>> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> *Subject*: Re: CTS community mail
>>
>> Damage from juggles don't seem to hurt all that much. Most of the beefy
>> damage seems to come from counter hits.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Am I imagining things or is the damage much lower in T7?
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:48 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> did u watch the matches??????
>>
>> sap pls
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 19:47:45 +0200
>>
>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> LB, LB pls and tsek.
>> On 8 Dec 2014 19:46, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> wtf , im not trolling , im really excited about this.
>>
>> it looks more hype. harada might be on to something
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 19:43:33 +0200
>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> You're still dabes troll LB *lol*
>> On 8 Dec 2014 19:41, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>> http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/dec/08/finally-some-high-level-tekken-7-matches-exhibition-tournament-footage-20-years-tekken-fanfare-event/
>>
>> tekken looks hype , the decrease in the roster size got me excited.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:10:39 +0200
>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Ja, Street Fighter is such an incredible art of fiction as it is, they
>> better not stuff it up.
>> On 8 Dec 2014 17:06, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I hope it's after 4 ,, they have to progress the story dude
>> On Dec 8, 2014 4:53 PM, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> If sfv is before 3s they better have oro in there before he started
>> handicapping himself.
>>
>> On Monday, December 8, 2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hypest USFIV match @ NEC
>>
>> USF4, Pepeday vs Snake Eyez (NEC 15 Loser's Finals)
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDr_IVoKDk8>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:35 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> speak to me again when its over nine thousand
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:32:49 +0200
>>
>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Tencent does a lot of things. They even own a share of Epic.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tencent
>>
>> They're one of the reasons Naspers' share price is currently over R1400.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:30 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> aren't they the people that made zangdaou ziwang?
>>
>> also , whens Dengenki gunko fighting climax?
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:26:26 +0200
>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> 10TB free storage from TenCent:
>>
>> http://www.1mtb.com/how-to-get-10-tb-free-online-cloud-storage-from-tencent-weiyun/
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Sean Carrington <
>> theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> @Nic, I got your sync cable back from Yann. Will bring it on Saturday
>> (hopefully)
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Besides the new Lily/Alisa/Ling cat chick I'm actually really liking how
>> T7 is looking with the shorter combos
>>
>> On 8 December 2014 at 13:29, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Just watched the SFV gameplay.
>> ground bounce is not rad.
>>
>> On 8 December 2014 at 13:26, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> If Bison dies then Rose also dies because they share the same soul. In
>> fact, Rose was also believed to be dead in the SF universe but they brought
>> her back for SFIV.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:56 PM, richard moorcroft <
>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Wow so Bison is immortal,, he can't die cause of his psycho power?? So
>> he will always have a nice new body after the other 1 dies or gets crushed
>> AGAIN
>> On Dec 8, 2014 12:53 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> M.Bison was killed by Akuma in Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo. Prior to
>> SFIII, he was considered to be dead. It was revealed in SFIV that his
>> subordinates created a new body for him. Noone knows what happens to Bison
>> after SFIV.
>>
>> As for SFV, we don't know where it takes place on the timeline, but you
>> can see Ryu has some of his 3rd Strike moves (his cr.mk resembles
>> Akuma's sweep). This implies that Ryu is maturing, so it definitely
>> happens after SFIV, but we can't say for sure that it happens after SFIII.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:41 PM, richard moorcroft <
>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> So no Bison?? Or do they always include D E A D characters??
>> On Dec 8, 2014 11:42 AM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> ugh meant 5
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:16:39 +0200
>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>> From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> LB please.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:15 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> wtf I thought it was Friday!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:11:52 +0200
>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> Fight night saturday you nooblet.
>>
>> Sap, are we having a session at Kami as well, or are we going to jeeva's
>> first then shooting through?
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Pepeday makes me like Fuerte for 5 minutes. His losers' finals set vs
>> Snake Eyez was amazing.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:58 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> erm no , I mean friday
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:56:51 -0800
>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> You mean Saturday
>> On Dec 8, 2014 9:52 AM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> morning peeps,
>>
>> What r the plan for this Friday?
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 07:01:45 +0200
>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> [image: Smiling face with open mouth]
>>
>> On Monday, December 8, 2014, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Looks like an atooget free zone.
>>
>> On Monday, December 8, 2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> 1 block from me:
>> https://twitter.com/The_360_Lounge
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> KOFXIII at NEC is pretty hype right now
>>
>> http://www.twitch.tv/teamsp00ky
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
Other related posts:
