Re: CTS community mail
- From: Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:58:04 +0200
Sessions at Marion island ya'll
I'll bring chips.
On 17 November 2014 13:56, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Lion’s Head was an active volcano a few million years ago. Not anymore.
>
> Marion Island is probably our closest active volcano.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel
> *Sent:* 17 November 2014 1:52 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject:* Re: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> Are there any volcanoes near by ?
>
>
>
> On 17 November 2014 13:48, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> That's all fine and good. I've already mentioned that I have no issues
> with him building up the college and prioritising that. But I'm still
> paying to use the venue. If I was there for free, I wouldn't say anything.
>
>
>
> You don't have to be a 'good communicator' to communicate. It's got
> nothing to do with being eloquent or being professional; it has everything
> to do with being open and honest. Things are happening there that is not
> being communicated. Jeeva CAN communicate the changes but CHOOSES not to. I
> refer to 'selective' communication yet again. If it suits him, he'll inform
> you about it. If you don't need to know, you won't hear from him. If you
> don't agree, I accept that, but I'm just going according to what I
> experienced this past Saturday, and I wasn't the only one.
>
>
>
> I'm not saying I'm ungrateful for what he's done and for allowing us to
> use his venue and facilities, and I agree that we are fortunate to have
> what we have, but I'm not the biggest fan of being left in the dark about
> everything that is happening there now.
>
>
>
> So look. We can continue to do what we do there and put up with having to
> 'keep quiet' when it suits Jeeva and wait for the next change to happen
> that might not even be communicated, as long as it's what everyone wants
> collectively. I just want people to be able to enjoy themselves and make
> the most of the day. If that's not happening, damn straight I'm going to
> look elsewhere.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You're overthinking this.
> Take it easy before you stroke out.
>
> Jeeva has been busy building up the college, his prioroties lie there.
> That makes us no2, Jeeves isn't the best at communicating or
> multitasking. At least, that's what I'm assuming/speculating.
>
> I've never seen myself as a paying customer and therefore never expect
> service delivery.
> For me it has always been more along the lines of, we get to use the
> venue, here's a little something for your trouble.
>
> I think we are really fortunate to have what we have already.
> I'm mostly thankful for just that.
>
> On 17 Nov 2014 13:11, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If Jeeva honestly feels that we've overstayed our welcome, it wouldn't
> offend me if he just said so *lol* Just be honest and say "Listen guys,
> unfortunately I won't be able to accommodate you anymore because I'm
> looking to take things in a different direction". I wouldn't have a problem
> with that because you were up front with me about what's happening. Leaving
> things open to interpretation, on the other hand, is a very dangerous thing.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Sean Carrington <
> theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm all for Kamimodo as well (not just cuz of it's proximity lol).
>
> Like Ashraf said it has that Gecco vibe to it that was really cool back in
> the days, and it's a more gaming friendly place IMO.
>
> Not to mention there's a bigger probability to attrack more gamers
> there... well i think.
>
>
> I wouldn't know about how Jeeva feels but should it really be the case
> that we've overstayed our welcome, it's only natural.
>
> We've been there for quite a long time so it wouldn't be a surprise.
>
> I'm down with Kamimodo if the rates are fair enough for everyon :)
> #MovingON
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:42 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I like this idea the most.
>
> Thank you nick.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:32:47 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> I dunno what to say about Jeeva.
> I know this.
>
> He wants us there. He won't want us to leave. He lacks communication.
>
> Here's what I have to say.
>
> I like Kamimodo, but Jeeva's is nearer.
> Jeeva is lighter on the pocket, but we have to deal with bs.
> Kamimodo is more expensive, but the exposure is awesome.
>
> In my opinion, the best way to deal with this diplomatically, would be to
> ask Jeeva if there will be any meetings and shit in the week, and then
> relocate for that weekend.
> If there's no-one at Jeevas, have a session there instead.
>
> That way, we can keep the communication on the level, and let both parties
> know how we operate.
> Whoever needs us the most, will make the most effort.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
Other related posts:
