Re: CTS community mail
- From: sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 12:55:38 +0200
Sure, it's a little different but as long as Ultra remains the tournament
standard I I don't see too many peeps investing huge amounts of time and
effort into it especially with SF5 on the horizon.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:18 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> morning peeps,
>
> How come you guys didn't play omega edition? its fun.
>
> @sap, I need to see born invincible.
>
> Keybox should be bant
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 09:08:24 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Keybox+paas=best
>
> On Sunday, January 4, 2015, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Hehe... sure.
> On 4 Jan 2015 21:23, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Minor details
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 20:34:50 +0200
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> That's because you never blocked it, lol.
> On 4 Jan 2015 19:46, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> That DP of his
>
> Quite annoying.
>
> Apparently its -22 on block... didnt feel that bad.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 17:38:48 +0200
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Lol. Whatever.
>
> After about 30 or so losses, I started to hold my own.
> ...and that's with day-1-Axl.
>
> Paas knows I'm coming for him. :D
> On 4 Jan 2015 16:52, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> she needs to be bant
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 15:53:01 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Paas *lol* Elphelt too stronk.
> On 4 Jan 2015 15:50, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So who is da bes at guilty giiya ? :P
>
> On Friday, January 2, 2015, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You would thrive with a rush-down character.
> On 2 Jan 2015 18:39, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On everyone's recommendation, I have started playing with Axl. Lord, he
> feels odd, and nothing like Billy.
> For some reason, when I play with him, I keep on pressing the wrong
> buttons for his specials. Perhaps because I used to use some other
> configuration on the first GG.
> I need to play some matches, so that someone can beat it into me.
> On 2 Jan 2015 09:03, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ah, no, I'll play. Just don't expect ant new combos and such until I hit
> the lab.
>
> ...and I'll play the winner of that first to 20.
> On 1 Jan 2015 23:54, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> @Nick,
> So no potemkin on Saturday???
>
> @ SAP
> FT20 at KOF '98 ultimate match final edition!!!
> On 1 Jan 2015 23:17, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Who must I blame for sharing Dragon's Crown with me?
>
> Can't...stop...playing...
> On 1 Jan 2015 20:42, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Yes,, oh yes Its EXTREMELY NICE,, you should try it sometime
> On Jan 1, 2015 8:07 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> lol no,
>
> i hear langebaan is nice.
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 19:08:20 +0200
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Langebaan,, wanna come pick me up??? Cause then I can have fun too at
> session
> On Jan 1, 2015 7:06 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> whered you go for the holidays?
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 16:38:37 +0200
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I can't make it coming back on Sunday only,, I didn't want to miss it
> believe me
> On Jan 1, 2015 12:24 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> il be there
>
> coming back to cpt on Saturday, gna be there to poon you guys, good way to
> start the year off.
>
> filthy, you better come to the sesh
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:55:19 +0200
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> It would be nice to have a Teleport ability,, so I can go where i want too
> On Jan 1, 2015 11:48 AM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Sorry to hear that Rich.
> On 1 Jan 2015 11:41, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I can't make the new years session its so sad
> On Jan 1, 2015 11:27 AM, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Cool
>
> Im there.
>
> Guilty
> Gear
> Eks
> Hard
> !
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:23:05 +0200
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> This Sat at Jeeva's :)
> On 1 Jan 2015 11:18, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Sooo
>
> When is the next session?
>
>
> Back from my little holiday and stuff... starting again on monday :(
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:04:26 +0200
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I hope you got game because I want a ft5 against you at the session...
> On 30 Dec 2014 18:29, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ya i dunno , it smells alot like taken.
>
> i dont like revenge movies.
>
> I watched the croods, good cartoon movie. The voice of the father sounded
> so familiar , turns out it was nicholas cage, lol
>
> I lost at jhb vs cpt 5v5 in bb, i need to hold dat L. cant really talk
> smack now in xrd thread. I just need to silently poon all.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:59:39 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Just finished watching John Wick. The movie is kinda mediocre but the
> action scenes are top notch.
> On 30 Dec 2014 13:39, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Finally made SMB my bitch. They even have this helpful message at the end
> telling you "Congrats! You have finished everying in NSMB!"
>
> On to Bayonetta 2 now. Man, what a game. I can see myself playing this
> for a while.
>
>
> Stupid lol of the day:
> Beyond Thug Life (Beyond Scared Straight)
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3QcfZhYBzo&feature=youtu.be>
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> *LOL*
>
> That Jean though...
>
> And Professor X looks (and sounds) like Dr. Evil *lol*
> On 29 Dec 2014 21:02, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Ex-Men: Jean Grey <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-iMVsi0IuY>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:59:16 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> If you want to get really technical (read: anal) you can say that you'd
> also have to prove that married and unmarried are mutually exclusive
> states.
>
> Consider polygamy: You can be married to 4 women, but then you divorce 1.
> To unmarry someone means to undo a marriage them. So technically in this
> case you are married and unmarried.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:30 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> lol, hadn't considered that possibility :P
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Correct, except if you use Constructive Logic. In that case you would be
> required to prove that Alice, Bob and Charlie are indeed a married or
> unmarried person, and you would not be able to use the Law of the Excluded
> Middle or Double Negation.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic
>
> Why is this important? Because Alice, Bob and Charlie may in fact be the
> name of animals (not people), which would either mean the answer is False
> or undecidable.
>
> But we are reasonable folk after all, so we can appeal to Occam's Razor to
> handle that.
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:25 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Yes, because irrespective of Alice's status the question being asked will
> be held true for either the first or second statement.
>
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> By the way, here's a riddle:
>
> Bob is looking at Alice. Alice is looking at Charlie. Bob is married.
> Charlie is not.
>
> Is a married person looking at an unmarried person?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
